• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

难民和寻求庇护者自助加护:一项个体参与者数据荟萃分析。

Self-Help Plus for refugees and asylum seekers: an individual participant data meta-analysis.

机构信息

Department of Clinical, Neuro-, and Developmental Psychology and WHO Collaborating Centre for Research and Dissemination of Psychological Interventions, Vrije Universiteit Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands

Amsterdam Public Health Research Institute, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.

出版信息

BMJ Ment Health. 2023 Jul;26(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjment-2023-300672.

DOI:10.1136/bmjment-2023-300672
PMID:37524517
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10391800/
Abstract

QUESTION

Refugees and asylum seekers are at high risk of mental disorders due to various stressors before, during and after forceful displacement. The WHO Self-Help Plus (SH+) intervention was developed to manage psychological distress and a broad range of mental health symptoms in vulnerable populations. This study aimed to examine the effects and moderators of SH+ compared with Enhanced Care as Usual (ECAU) in reducing depressive symptoms among refugees and asylum seekers.

STUDY SELECTION AND ANALYSIS

Three randomised trials were identified with 1795 individual participant data (IPD). We performed an IPD meta-analysis to estimate the effects of SH+, primarily on depressive symptoms and second on post-traumatic stress, well-being, self-identified problems and functioning. Effects were also estimated at 5-6 months postrandomisation (midterm).

FINDINGS

There was no evidence of a difference between SH+ and ECAU+ in reducing depressive symptoms at postintervention. However, SH+ had significantly larger effects among participants who were not employed (β=1.60, 95% CI 0.20 to 3.00) and had lower mental well-being levels (β=0.02, 95% CI 0.001 to 0.05). At midterm, SH+ was significantly more effective than ECAU in improving depressive symptoms (β=-1.13, 95% CI -1.99 to -0.26), self-identified problems (β=-1.56, 95% CI -2.54 to -0.59) and well-being (β=6.22, 95% CI 1.60 to 10.90).

CONCLUSIONS

Although SH+ did not differ significantly from ECAU in reducing symptoms of depression at postintervention, it did present benefits for particularly vulnerable participants (ie, unemployed and with lower mental well-being levels), and benefits were also evident at midterm follow-up. These results are promising for the use of SH+ in the management of depressive symptoms and improvement of well-being and self-identified problems among refugees and asylum seekers.

摘要

问题

难民和寻求庇护者由于在被迫流离失所之前、期间和之后面临各种压力源,他们患有精神障碍的风险很高。世卫组织自助加(SH+)干预措施是为了管理弱势人群的心理困扰和广泛的心理健康症状而开发的。本研究旨在检验 SH+与增强常规护理(ECAU)相比在减少难民和寻求庇护者的抑郁症状方面的效果和调节因素。

研究选择和分析

确定了三项随机试验,共有 1795 名个体参与者数据(IPD)。我们进行了 IPD 荟萃分析,以估计 SH+的效果,主要是在抑郁症状上,其次是在创伤后应激、幸福感、自我认定的问题和功能上。还在随机分组后 5-6 个月(中期)估计了效果。

结果

在干预后,SH+与 ECAU+在减轻抑郁症状方面没有差异。然而,在未就业的参与者(β=1.60,95%CI 0.20 至 3.00)和心理健康水平较低的参与者中,SH+的效果明显更大(β=0.02,95%CI 0.001 至 0.05)。在中期,SH+在改善抑郁症状(β=-1.13,95%CI -1.99 至 -0.26)、自我认定的问题(β=-1.56,95%CI -2.54 至 -0.59)和幸福感(β=6.22,95%CI 1.60 至 10.90)方面明显优于 ECAU。

结论

尽管 SH+在干预后在减轻抑郁症状方面与 ECAU 没有显著差异,但它确实为特别脆弱的参与者(即失业和心理健康水平较低的参与者)提供了益处,而且在中期随访中也有明显的益处。这些结果为 SH+在管理难民和寻求庇护者的抑郁症状以及改善幸福感和自我认定的问题方面的应用提供了希望。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ccb3/10391800/b1c327185ccb/bmjment-2023-300672f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ccb3/10391800/b1c327185ccb/bmjment-2023-300672f01.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/ccb3/10391800/b1c327185ccb/bmjment-2023-300672f01.jpg

相似文献

1
Self-Help Plus for refugees and asylum seekers: an individual participant data meta-analysis.难民和寻求庇护者自助加护:一项个体参与者数据荟萃分析。
BMJ Ment Health. 2023 Jul;26(1). doi: 10.1136/bmjment-2023-300672.
2
Psychological therapies for post-traumatic stress disorder and comorbid substance use disorder.创伤后应激障碍及共病物质使用障碍的心理治疗
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Apr 4;4(4):CD010204. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010204.pub2.
3
Prescription of Controlled Substances: Benefits and Risks管制药品的处方:益处与风险
4
Psychological, social and welfare interventions for psychological health and well-being of torture survivors.针对酷刑幸存者心理健康和福祉的心理、社会及福利干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Nov 11;2014(11):CD009317. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD009317.pub2.
5
Psychological therapies for women who experience intimate partner violence.针对遭受亲密伴侣暴力的女性的心理疗法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2020 Jul 1;7(7):CD013017. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD013017.pub2.
6
Psychological therapies for the treatment of mental disorders in low- and middle-income countries affected by humanitarian crises.针对受人道主义危机影响的低收入和中等收入国家精神障碍治疗的心理疗法。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2018 Jul 5;7(7):CD011849. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011849.pub2.
7
Psychological and pharmacological interventions for posttraumatic stress disorder and comorbid mental health problems following complex traumatic events: Systematic review and component network meta-analysis.复杂创伤性事件后创伤后应激障碍及共患精神健康问题的心理和药理学干预措施:系统评价和成分网络荟萃分析。
PLoS Med. 2020 Aug 19;17(8):e1003262. doi: 10.1371/journal.pmed.1003262. eCollection 2020 Aug.
8
The Black Book of Psychotropic Dosing and Monitoring.《精神药物剂量与监测黑皮书》
Psychopharmacol Bull. 2024 Jul 8;54(3):8-59.
9
Antidepressant treatment for postnatal depression.产后抑郁症的抗抑郁治疗。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2014 Sep 11;2014(9):CD002018. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD002018.pub2.
10
Psychological and social interventions for the promotion of mental health in people living in low- and middle-income countries affected by humanitarian crises.促进中低收入国家受人道主义危机影响人群心理健康的心理和社会干预措施。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 May 21;5(5):CD014300. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014300.pub2.

引用本文的文献

1
Effectiveness of adapted self-help plus (SH+) to reduce psychological distress among university students in Indonesia (APRESIASI): protocol of a randomized controlled trial.适应性自助增强疗法(SH+)减轻印度尼西亚大学生心理困扰的效果(APRESIASI):一项随机对照试验方案
BMC Psychol. 2025 Jul 8;13(1):752. doi: 10.1186/s40359-025-03026-y.
2
Effectiveness of barber-facilitated "Doing What Matters in Times of Stress" intervention among urban literate youths in Western Kenya: A cluster randomised trial.肯尼亚西部城市有文化青年中,理发师协助开展的“压力之下做重要之事”干预措施的效果:一项整群随机试验
PLOS Glob Public Health. 2025 Jun 18;5(6):e0004712. doi: 10.1371/journal.pgph.0004712. eCollection 2025.
3

本文引用的文献

1
Effectiveness of a WHO self-help psychological intervention for preventing mental disorders among Syrian refugees in Turkey: a randomized controlled trial.世界卫生组织自助心理干预对预防土耳其境内叙利亚难民精神障碍的有效性:一项随机对照试验。
World Psychiatry. 2022 Feb;21(1):88-95. doi: 10.1002/wps.20939.
2
Effectiveness of Self-Help Plus in Preventing Mental Disorders in Refugees and Asylum Seekers in Western Europe: A Multinational Randomized Controlled Trial.自助加预防在西欧难民和寻求庇护者中预防精神障碍的效果:一项多国随机对照试验。
Psychother Psychosom. 2021;90(6):403-414. doi: 10.1159/000517504. Epub 2021 Jul 20.
3
World Health Organization Evidence-Based Self-Help Plus Intervention for Stress Management via Chatbot: Protocol for Adaptation to a Tech-Enabled Model.
世界卫生组织通过聊天机器人进行压力管理的循证自助强化干预:适应技术支持模式的方案
JMIR Res Protoc. 2025 Jun 26;14:e69644. doi: 10.2196/69644.
4
Implementing scalable face-to-face and digital interventions among forcibly displaced persons from Ukraine in Europe: protocol of The U-RISE Project.在欧洲的乌克兰 forcibly displaced persons 中实施可扩展的面对面和数字干预措施:U-RISE 项目方案 。 需注意的是,“forcibly displaced persons”直译为“被强迫流离失所者”,结合语境这里应该是指乌克兰难民这类群体 。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2025 Dec;16(1):2468117. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2025.2468117. Epub 2025 Feb 27.
5
War exposure, daily stressors, and mental health 15 years on: implications of an ecological framework for addressing the mental health of conflict-affected populations.战争暴露、日常压力源与15年后的心理健康:生态框架对解决受冲突影响人群心理健康问题的启示。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2024 Dec 11;33:e78. doi: 10.1017/S2045796024000830.
6
A Chatbot-Based Version of the World Health Organization-Validated Self-Help Plus Intervention for Stress Management: Co-Design and Usability Testing.基于聊天机器人的世界卫生组织验证的压力管理自助加干预版本:共同设计和可用性测试。
JMIR Hum Factors. 2024 Oct 18;11:e64614. doi: 10.2196/64614.
7
Effect of trauma on asylum seekers and refugees receiving a WHO psychological intervention: a mediation model.创伤对接受世卫组织心理干预的寻求庇护者和难民的影响:一个中介模型。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2024;15(1):2355828. doi: 10.1080/20008066.2024.2355828. Epub 2024 Jun 3.
8
Effectiveness of a scalable, remotely delivered stepped-care intervention to reduce symptoms of psychological distress among Polish migrant workers in the Netherlands: study protocol for the RESPOND randomised controlled trial.一项可扩展的、远程提供的阶梯式护理干预措施,以减轻荷兰波兰移民工人心理困扰症状的有效性:RESPOND 随机对照试验研究方案。
BMC Psychiatry. 2023 Nov 2;23(1):801. doi: 10.1186/s12888-023-05288-5.
Self-help plus for refugees and asylum seekers; study protocol for a series of individual participant data meta-analyses.
自助加给难民和寻求庇护者;一系列个体参与者数据荟萃分析的研究方案。
Eur J Psychotraumatol. 2021 Jul 5;12(1):1930690. doi: 10.1080/20008198.2021.1930690. eCollection 2021.
4
Diverse and Complex Challenges to Migrant and Refugee Mental Health: Reflections of the M8 Alliance Expert Group on Migrant Health.移民和难民心理健康的多样性和复杂性挑战:M8 联盟移民健康专家组的反思。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2020 May 18;17(10):3530. doi: 10.3390/ijerph17103530.
5
Psychological interventions for posttraumatic stress disorder and depression in refugees: A meta-analysis of randomized controlled trials.创伤后应激障碍和难民中抑郁的心理干预:随机对照试验的荟萃分析。
Clin Psychol Psychother. 2020 Jul;27(4):489-503. doi: 10.1002/cpp.2446. Epub 2020 Mar 25.
6
Guided self-help to reduce psychological distress in South Sudanese female refugees in Uganda: a cluster randomised trial.在乌干达的南苏丹女性难民中实施基于指导的自助以减轻心理困扰:一项集群随机试验。
Lancet Glob Health. 2020 Feb;8(2):e254-e263. doi: 10.1016/S2214-109X(19)30504-2.
7
New WHO prevalence estimates of mental disorders in conflict settings: a systematic review and meta-analysis.世界卫生组织关于冲突环境中心理障碍患病率的最新估计:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Lancet. 2019 Jul 20;394(10194):240-248. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(19)30934-1. Epub 2019 Jun 12.
8
Effectiveness and cost-effectiveness of Self-Help Plus (SH+) for preventing mental disorders in refugees and asylum seekers in Europe and Turkey: study protocols for two randomised controlled trials.自助加(SH+)预防欧洲和土耳其难民和寻求庇护者精神障碍的有效性和成本效益:两项随机对照试验的研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 May 14;9(5):e030259. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2019-030259.
9
Mental health care utilisation and access among refugees and asylum seekers in Europe: A systematic review.欧洲难民和寻求庇护者的心理健康保健利用和获取情况:系统评价。
Health Policy. 2019 Sep;123(9):851-863. doi: 10.1016/j.healthpol.2019.02.007. Epub 2019 Feb 22.
10
Efficacy and acceptability of psychosocial interventions in asylum seekers and refugees: systematic review and meta-analysis.寻求庇护者和难民中的心理社会干预措施的疗效和可接受性:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Epidemiol Psychiatr Sci. 2019 Aug;28(4):376-388. doi: 10.1017/S2045796019000027. Epub 2019 Feb 11.