• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

相似文献

1
Applying an equity lens to hospital safety monitoring: a critical interpretive synthesis protocol.运用公平视角监测医院安全:一项关键的阐释性综合研究方案。
BMJ Open. 2023 Jul 31;13(7):e072706. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072706.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
4
How human factors affect escalation of care: a protocol for a qualitative evidence synthesis of studies.人为因素如何影响医疗照护升级:一项定性证据综合研究的方案。
BMJ Open. 2019 Apr 8;9(4):e025969. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2018-025969.
5
Health professionals' experience of teamwork education in acute hospital settings: a systematic review of qualitative literature.医疗专业人员在急症医院环境中团队合作教育的经验:对定性文献的系统综述
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2016 Apr;14(4):96-137. doi: 10.11124/JBISRIR-2016-1843.
6
Relationship between patient safety culture and patient experience in hospital settings: a scoping review protocol.医院环境中患者安全文化与患者体验之间的关系:范围综述方案。
BMJ Open. 2021 May 31;11(5):e049873. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2021-049873.
7
The Effectiveness of Integrated Care Pathways for Adults and Children in Health Care Settings: A Systematic Review.综合护理路径在医疗环境中对成人和儿童的有效性:一项系统评价。
JBI Libr Syst Rev. 2009;7(3):80-129. doi: 10.11124/01938924-200907030-00001.
8
Student and educator experiences of maternal-child simulation-based learning: a systematic review of qualitative evidence protocol.基于母婴模拟学习的学生和教育工作者体验:定性证据协议的系统评价
JBI Database System Rev Implement Rep. 2015 Jan;13(1):14-26. doi: 10.11124/jbisrir-2015-1694.
9
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
10
Telemedicine for the Medicare population: pediatric, obstetric, and clinician-indirect home interventions.面向医疗保险人群的远程医疗:儿科、产科及临床医生间接居家干预措施
Evid Rep Technol Assess (Summ). 2001 Aug(24 Suppl):1-32.

引用本文的文献

1
What are the ethical issues related to telerehabilitation? A critical interpretive synthesis protocol.与远程康复相关的伦理问题有哪些?一项批判性解释性综合方案。
BMJ Open. 2025 May 8;15(5):e099728. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2025-099728.

本文引用的文献

1
Contributors are representative, as long as they agree: How confirmation logic overrides effort to achieve synthesis in applied health research.只要参与者表示同意,他们就具有代表性:确认逻辑如何在应用健康研究中克服综合努力。
Health Expect. 2022 Oct;25(5):2405-2415. doi: 10.1111/hex.13555. Epub 2022 Aug 11.
2
Patient-physician language concordance and quality and safety outcomes among frail home care recipients admitted to hospital in Ontario, Canada.加拿大安大略省因体弱而接受家庭护理的住院患者中,医患语言一致性与质量和安全结局的关系。
CMAJ. 2022 Jul 11;194(26):E899-E908. doi: 10.1503/cmaj.212155.
3
Disparities in Adverse Event Reporting for Hospitalized Children.住院儿童不良事件报告中的差异。
J Patient Saf. 2022 Sep 1;18(6):e928-e933. doi: 10.1097/PTS.0000000000001049. Epub 2022 Jul 7.
4
Can a Focus on Equity, Diversity and Inclusion Transform Health Services Research?关注公平、多样性和包容性能否改变卫生服务研究?
Healthc Pap. 2022 Apr;20(3):53-60. doi: 10.12927/hcpap.2022.26843.
5
Clinicians' Perspectives on Racism and Black Women's Maternal Health.临床医生对种族主义与黑人女性孕产妇健康的看法
Womens Health Rep (New Rochelle). 2022 May 4;3(1):476-482. doi: 10.1089/whr.2021.0148. eCollection 2022.
6
Strategies to record and use ethnicity information in routine health data.在常规健康数据中记录和使用种族信息的策略。
Nat Med. 2022 Jul;28(7):1338-1342. doi: 10.1038/s41591-022-01842-y.
7
Do national policies for complaint handling in English hospitals support quality improvement? Lessons from a case study.英文医院投诉处理国家政策是否支持质量改进?一项案例研究的经验教训。
J R Soc Med. 2022 Oct;115(10):390-398. doi: 10.1177/01410768221098247. Epub 2022 May 31.
8
Measuring Health Equity in Emergency Care Using Routinely Collected Data: A Systematic Review.利用常规收集的数据衡量急诊医疗中的健康公平性:一项系统综述。
Health Equity. 2021 Dec 1;5(1):801-817. doi: 10.1089/heq.2021.0035. eCollection 2021.
9
An Equity Agenda for the Field of Health Care Quality Improvement.医疗质量改进领域的公平议程。
NAM Perspect. 2021 Sep 15;2021. doi: 10.31478/202109b. eCollection 2021.
10
Conceptualizing the digitalization of healthcare work: A metaphor-based Critical Interpretive Synthesis.概念化医疗工作的数字化:基于隐喻的批判解释性综合。
Soc Sci Med. 2022 Jan;292:114572. doi: 10.1016/j.socscimed.2021.114572. Epub 2021 Nov 18.

运用公平视角监测医院安全:一项关键的阐释性综合研究方案。

Applying an equity lens to hospital safety monitoring: a critical interpretive synthesis protocol.

机构信息

Centre for Quality Improvement and Patient Safety, University of Toronto Temerty Faculty of Medicine, Toronto, Ontario, Canada

Department of Medicine, University of Toronto Temerty Faculty of Medicine, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.

出版信息

BMJ Open. 2023 Jul 31;13(7):e072706. doi: 10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072706.

DOI:10.1136/bmjopen-2023-072706
PMID:37524554
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10391806/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

Hospital safety monitoring systems are foundational to how adverse events are identified and addressed. They are well positioned to bring equity-related safety issues to the forefront for action. However, there is uncertainty about how they have been, and can be, used to achieve this goal. We will undertake a critical interpretive synthesis (CIS) to examine how equity is integrated into hospital safety monitoring systems.

METHODS AND ANALYSIS

This review will follow CIS principles. Our initial compass question is: How is equity integrated into safety monitoring systems? We will begin with a structured search strategy of hospital safety monitoring systems in CINAHL, EMBASE, MEDLINE and PsycINFO for up to May 2023 to identify papers on safety monitoring systems generally and those linked to equity (eg, racism, social determinants of health). We will also review reference lists of selected papers, contact experts and draw on team expertise. For subsequent literature searching stages, we will use team expertise and expert contacts to purposively search the social science, humanities and health services research literature to support the development of a theoretical understanding of our topic. Following data extraction, we will use interpretive processes to develop themes and a critique of the literature. The above processes of question formulation, article search and selection, data extraction, and critique and synthesis will be iterative and interactive with the goal to develop a theoretical understanding of equity in hospital monitoring systems that will have practice-based implications.

ETHICS AND DISSEMINATION

This review does not require ethical approval because we are reviewing published literature. We aim to publish findings in a peer-reviewed journal and present at conferences.

摘要

简介

医院安全监测系统是识别和处理不良事件的基础。它们非常适合将与公平相关的安全问题提上日程,采取行动。然而,对于它们如何以及可以用来实现这一目标,还存在不确定性。我们将进行批判性解释性综合(CIS)研究,以考察公平是如何融入医院安全监测系统的。

方法和分析

本综述将遵循 CIS 原则。我们的初始指南针问题是:公平是如何融入安全监测系统的?我们将从 CINAHL、EMBASE、MEDLINE 和 PsycINFO 中进行针对医院安全监测系统的结构化搜索策略,以查找一般安全监测系统以及与公平(例如种族主义、健康的社会决定因素)相关的论文,时间截至 2023 年 5 月。我们还将审查选定论文的参考文献列表,与专家联系,并利用团队专业知识。在随后的文献搜索阶段,我们将利用团队专业知识和专家联系,有针对性地搜索社会科学、人文学科和卫生服务研究文献,以支持对我们主题的理论理解的发展。在提取数据后,我们将使用解释性过程来开发主题,并对文献进行批判。问题制定、文章搜索和选择、数据提取以及批判和综合的上述过程将是迭代和互动的,目的是对医院监测系统中的公平形成理论理解,从而具有实践意义。

伦理和传播

本综述不需要伦理批准,因为我们正在审查已发表的文献。我们的目标是在同行评议的期刊上发表研究结果,并在会议上展示。