Manning Michael W, Whittle John, Fuller Matthew, Cooper Sara H, Manning Erin L, Chapman Joe, Moul Judd W, Miller Timothy E
Department of Anaesthesiology, Duke University, Durham, NC, 27710, USA.
Centre for Perioperative Medicine, Division of Surgery & Interventional Science, UCL, London, UK.
Perioper Med (Lond). 2023 Aug 1;12(1):43. doi: 10.1186/s13741-023-00331-1.
Opioid use has come under increasing scrutiny, driven in part by the opioid crisis and growing concerns that up to 6% of opioid-naïve patients may become chronic opioid users. This has resulted in a revaluation of perioperative practice. For this reason, we implemented a multidisciplinary pathway to reduce perioperative opioid usage through education and standardization of practice.
A single-centre retrospective evaluation was performed after 1 year, comparing the outcomes to those of the 2 years prior to pathway implementation. Comparisons were made between pre- vs. post pathway change by 2:1 propensity matching between cohorts. Univariate linear regression models were created using demographic variables with those that were p < 0.15 included in the final model and using post-operative opioid use (in oral morphine equivalents, OME) as the primary outcome.
We found that intraoperative opioid use was significantly decreased 38.2 mg (28.3) vs. 18.0 mg (40.4) oral morphine equivalents (OME), p < .001, as was post-operative opioid use for the duration of the hospitalization, 46.3 mg (49.5) vs. 35.49 mg (43.7) OME, p = 0.002. In subgroup analysis of those that received some intraoperative opioids (n = 152) and those that received no opioids (n = 34), we found that both groups required fewer opioids in the post-operative period 47.0 mg (47.7) vs. 32.4 mg (40.6) OME, p = 0.001, + intraoperative opioids, 62.4 mg (62.9) vs. 35.8 mg (27.7) OME, p = 0.13, - intraoperative opioids. Time to discharge from the PACU was reduced in both groups 215 min (199) vs. 167 min (122), p < 0.003, + intraoperative opioids and 253 min (270) vs. 167 min (105), p = 0.028, - intraoperative opioids. The duration of time until meeting discharge criteria from PACU was 221 min (205) vs. 170 min (120), p = 0.001. Hospital length of stay (LOS) was significantly reduced 1.4 days (1.3) vs. 1.2 days (0.8), p = 0.005. Both sub-groups demonstrated reduced hospital LOS 1.5 days (1.4) vs. 1.2 days (0.8), p = 0.0047, + intraoperative opioids and 1.7 days (1.6) vs. 1.3 days (0.9), p = 0.0583, - intraoperative opioids. Average pain scores during PACU admission and post-PACU until discharge were not statistically different between cohorts.
These findings underscore the effectiveness of a multidisciplinary approach to reduce opioids. Furthermore, it demonstrates improved patient outcomes as measured by both shorter PACU and almost 50% reduction in perioperative opioid use whilst maintaining similar analgesia as indicated by patient-reported pain scores.
阿片类药物的使用受到了越来越多的审视,部分原因是阿片类药物危机以及人们越来越担心高达6%的未使用过阿片类药物的患者可能会成为慢性阿片类药物使用者。这导致了对围手术期实践的重新评估。因此,我们实施了一条多学科途径,通过教育和实践标准化来减少围手术期阿片类药物的使用。
在1年后进行了单中心回顾性评估,将结果与途径实施前的2年结果进行比较。通过队列之间2:1的倾向匹配对途径改变前后进行比较。使用人口统计学变量创建单变量线性回归模型,最终模型纳入p < 0.15的变量,并将术后阿片类药物使用量(以口服吗啡当量,OME计)作为主要结果。
我们发现术中阿片类药物使用量显著减少,口服吗啡当量从38.2 mg(28.3)降至18.0 mg(40.4),p < 0.001,住院期间的术后阿片类药物使用量也显著减少,从46.3 mg(49.5)降至35.49 mg(43.7)OME,p = 0.002。在接受了一些术中阿片类药物的亚组分析中(n = 152)和未接受阿片类药物的亚组分析中(n = 34),我们发现两组在术后所需的阿片类药物都更少,口服吗啡当量分别为47.0 mg(47.7)和32.4 mg(40.6),p = 0.001,+术中使用阿片类药物;62.4 mg(62.9)和35.8 mg(27.7)OME,p = 0.13,-术中使用阿片类药物。两组从麻醉后恢复室(PACU)出院的时间都缩短了,分别为215分钟(199)和167分钟(122),p < 0.003,+术中使用阿片类药物;253分钟(270)和167分钟(105),p = 0.028,-术中使用阿片类药物。达到PACU出院标准的时间为221分钟(205)和170分钟(120),p = 0.001。住院时间(LOS)显著缩短,从1.4天(1.3)降至1.2天(0.8),p = 0.005。两个亚组的住院时间都缩短了,分别为1.5天(1.4)和1.2天(0.8),p = 0.0047,+术中使用阿片类药物;1.7天((1.6)和1.3天(0.9),p = 0.058),-术中使用阿片类药物。队列之间在PACU入院期间和PACU后直至出院的平均疼痛评分没有统计学差异。
这些发现强调了多学科方法减少阿片类药物使用的有效性。此外,这表明通过缩短PACU时间和围手术期阿片类药物使用量减少近50%来衡量,患者的预后得到了改善,同时患者报告的疼痛评分表明镇痛效果相似。