• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

大五人格因素、认知能力、健康和社会人口学指标作为自我效能感的独立预测因素:一项纵向研究。

The Big-Five personality factors, cognitive ability, health, and social-demographic indicators as independent predictors of self-efficacy: A longitudinal study.

机构信息

BI: Norwegian Business School, Oslo, Norway.

Department of Psychology, University College London, London, UK.

出版信息

Scand J Psychol. 2024 Feb;65(1):53-60. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12953. Epub 2023 Jul 31.

DOI:10.1111/sjop.12953
PMID:37525487
Abstract

This study set out to examine to what extent a set of psychological, health and socio-demographic factors are associated with self-efficacy (SE) in a large sample of over 12,000 participants over a two-year period. We were interested in the correlates of self-efficacy (criterion variable) with gender, age, education and occupation, the Big-Five personality factors and cognitive ability, as well as mental and physical health (predictor variables). Regression analyses showed that four of the Big-Five personality factors (extraversion, neuroticism, conscientiousness, and openness), cognitive ability, mental and physical health, gender, education and occupation were all significant and independent predictors of self-efficacy, accounting for 23% of the variance of the outcome variable. Personality variables, particularly Neuroticism and Conscientiousness, were the most powerful predictors of SE two years later. The implications for encouraging SE in individuals are discussed.

摘要

本研究旨在探讨在超过 12000 名参与者的两年期间,一组心理、健康和社会人口因素在多大程度上与自我效能感(SE)相关。我们对自我效能感(因变量)与性别、年龄、教育程度和职业、大五人格因素和认知能力以及心理健康和身体健康(预测变量)的相关性感兴趣。回归分析表明,大五人格因素中的四个因素(外向性、神经质、尽责性和开放性)、认知能力、心理健康和身体健康、性别、教育程度和职业都是自我效能感的重要且独立的预测因素,占因变量方差的 23%。人格变量,特别是神经质和尽责性,是两年后 SE 的最有力预测因素。讨论了鼓励个体自我效能感的意义。

相似文献

1
The Big-Five personality factors, cognitive ability, health, and social-demographic indicators as independent predictors of self-efficacy: A longitudinal study.大五人格因素、认知能力、健康和社会人口学指标作为自我效能感的独立预测因素:一项纵向研究。
Scand J Psychol. 2024 Feb;65(1):53-60. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12953. Epub 2023 Jul 31.
2
Do Personality Traits Mediate the Relationship Between Childhood Abuse and Migraine? An Exploration of the Relationships in Young Adults Using the Add Health Dataset.人格特质是否在儿童期虐待与偏头痛之间起中介作用?利用“健康增进纵向研究”数据对青年期两者关系的探讨。
Headache. 2018 Feb;58(2):243-259. doi: 10.1111/head.13206. Epub 2017 Oct 13.
3
The mediating role of self-efficacy in the relationship between Big five personality and depressive symptoms among Chinese unemployed population: a cross-sectional study.自我效能感在中国失业人群大五人格与抑郁症状关系中的中介作用:一项横断面研究
BMC Psychiatry. 2014 Mar 3;14:61. doi: 10.1186/1471-244X-14-61.
4
Social-Demographic Indicators, Cognitive Ability, Personality Traits, and Region as Independent Predictors of Income: Findings from the UK Household Longitudinal Study (UKHLS).社会人口统计学指标、认知能力、人格特质及地区作为收入的独立预测因素:来自英国家庭纵向研究(UKHLS)的发现
J Intell. 2018 Mar 26;6(2):19. doi: 10.3390/jintelligence6020019.
5
Social anxiety and the Big Five personality traits: the interactive relationship of trust and openness.社交焦虑与大五人格特质:信任与开放性的交互关系。
Cogn Behav Ther. 2015;44(3):212-22. doi: 10.1080/16506073.2015.1008032. Epub 2015 Feb 23.
6
The Relationship Between Personality and Neurocognition Among the American Elderly: An Epidemiologic Study.美国老年人的人格与神经认知之间的关系:一项流行病学研究。
Clin Pract Epidemiol Ment Health. 2017 Nov 28;13:233-245. doi: 10.2174/1745017901713010233. eCollection 2017.
7
The interplay between personality and cognitive ability across 12 years in middle and late adulthood: Evidence for reciprocal associations.成年中后期12年间人格与认知能力的相互作用:相互关联的证据。
Psychol Aging. 2017 May;32(3):259-277. doi: 10.1037/pag0000166. Epub 2017 Feb 23.
8
Physical, cognitive, and social activities as mediators between personality and cognition: evidence from four prospective samples.身体活动、认知活动和社会活动在人格与认知之间的中介作用:来自四个前瞻性样本的证据。
Aging Ment Health. 2024 Sep;28(9):1294-1303. doi: 10.1080/13607863.2024.2320135. Epub 2024 Feb 27.
9
Domain and facet personality predictors of all-cause mortality among Medicare patients aged 65 to 100.65至100岁医疗保险患者全因死亡率的领域和层面人格预测因素
Psychosom Med. 2005 Sep-Oct;67(5):724-33. doi: 10.1097/01.psy.0000181272.58103.18.
10
Personality and smoking: individual-participant meta-analysis of nine cohort studies.人格与吸烟:九项队列研究的个体参与者荟萃分析
Addiction. 2015 Nov;110(11):1844-52. doi: 10.1111/add.13079. Epub 2015 Aug 22.

引用本文的文献

1
Adolescence and online vulnerability: The role of fear of missing out (FoMO): A cross-sectional study during the third wave of the COVID-19 pandemic.青春期与网络易损性:错失恐惧(FoMO)的作用:一项在新冠疫情第三波期间开展的横断面研究。
PLoS One. 2025 Sep 15;20(9):e0332147. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0332147. eCollection 2025.
2
Gender, Self-Efficacy, and Academic Performance: Evidence in Business Education Program.性别、自我效能感与学业成绩:商业教育项目中的证据
Behav Sci (Basel). 2025 Apr 22;15(5):563. doi: 10.3390/bs15050563.
3
Associations Between Personality Traits, Self-Efficacy and Complementary Feeding Behavior Among Infant Caregivers in Western Rural China.
中国西部农村地区婴幼儿照料者的人格特质、自我效能感与辅食喂养行为之间的关联
Matern Child Nutr. 2025 Jul;21(3):e70021. doi: 10.1111/mcn.70021. Epub 2025 Mar 13.
4
Decomposing differences in the chronic disease condition between rural and urban older adults in China: a cross-sectional analysis.中国农村和城市老年人群慢性病状况差异的分解:一项横断面分析。
Front Public Health. 2024 Jan 5;11:1298657. doi: 10.3389/fpubh.2023.1298657. eCollection 2023.