• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

保留交叉韧带与替代交叉韧带全膝关节置换术:一项荟萃分析。

Cruciate-Retaining Versus Cruciate-Substituting Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis.

作者信息

LeDuc Ryan C, Upadhyay Drashti, Brown Nicholas M

机构信息

Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Rehabilitation, Loyola University Medical Center, 2160 S First Ave. Maguire Bldg. Ste 1300, Maywood, IL 60153 USA.

Loyola University Chicago Stritch School of Medicine, Maywood, IL USA.

出版信息

Indian J Orthop. 2023 Jun 9;57(8):1188-1195. doi: 10.1007/s43465-023-00914-6. eCollection 2023 Aug.

DOI:10.1007/s43465-023-00914-6
PMID:37525728
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10386998/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Primary total knee arthroplasty (TKA) can be performed using cruciate-retaining (CR), cruciate-substituting (CS), or posterior-stabilized (PS) total knee arthroplasty designs. While there have been many studies comparing the outcomes of CR versus PS TKA, the current literature is lacking in systematic reviews and meta-analyses that compare outcomes of CR knees versus CS TKAs.

METHODS

This study is a systematic review and meta-analysis of the literature comparing CR and CS knees with regard to survivorship, functional, and patient-reported outcomes, range of motion (ROM), biomechanics, and revision rate. PubMed, Cochrane, and Embase were used for the literature search, and the Modified Coleman Methodology Score was used to assess the quality of the studies.

RESULTS

Seven studies met the inclusion criteria. This systematic review and meta-analysis suggests that there are no significant differences in survivorship, ROM, or clinical knee scores between the CR and CS knees. Postoperative complications did not vary greatly between the CR and CS groups. Among the seven studies, three CR designs needed revision for either patellar crepitus, joint stiffness, or aseptic loosening of the tibial component. One CS design needed arthrotomy due to patellar clunk syndrome.

CONCLUSION

CR and CS knees are both reasonable options for primary TKA.

摘要

背景

初次全膝关节置换术(TKA)可采用保留交叉韧带(CR)、替代交叉韧带(CS)或后稳定型(PS)全膝关节置换设计。虽然已有许多研究比较了CR与PS TKA的疗效,但目前的文献中缺乏比较CR膝关节与CS TKA疗效的系统评价和荟萃分析。

方法

本研究是一项对文献的系统评价和荟萃分析,比较了CR和CS膝关节在生存率、功能、患者报告结局、活动范围(ROM)、生物力学和翻修率方面的差异。使用PubMed、Cochrane和Embase进行文献检索,并使用改良的科尔曼方法评分来评估研究质量。

结果

七项研究符合纳入标准。这项系统评价和荟萃分析表明,CR和CS膝关节在生存率、ROM或临床膝关节评分方面没有显著差异。CR组和CS组术后并发症差异不大。在这七项研究中,三种CR设计因髌股关节摩擦音、关节僵硬或胫骨部件无菌性松动需要翻修。一种CS设计因髌股关节撞击综合征需要进行关节切开术。

结论

CR和CS膝关节都是初次TKA的合理选择。

相似文献

1
Cruciate-Retaining Versus Cruciate-Substituting Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis.保留交叉韧带与替代交叉韧带全膝关节置换术:一项荟萃分析。
Indian J Orthop. 2023 Jun 9;57(8):1188-1195. doi: 10.1007/s43465-023-00914-6. eCollection 2023 Aug.
2
Prior Patellectomy: A Systematic Review and Meta-Analysis Comparing Cruciate-Retaining and Posterior-Stabilized Total Knee Arthroplasty Survivorship and Reported Outcomes.全膝关节置换术前间室切除:比较保留交叉韧带和后稳定型全膝关节置换术的生存率和报告结果的系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Arthroplasty. 2024 Oct;39(10):2627-2632. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2024.05.002. Epub 2024 May 9.
3
Comparison of clinical outcomes among total knee arthroplasties using posterior-stabilized, cruciate-retaining, bi-cruciate substituting, bi-cruciate retaining designs: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.比较后稳定型、前交叉韧带保留型、双髁置换型和双交叉韧带保留型全膝关节置换术的临床疗效:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Chin Med J (Engl). 2023 Aug 5;136(15):1817-1831. doi: 10.1097/CM9.0000000000002183.
4
Cruciate retaining total knee arthroplasty has a better 10 year survival than posterior stabilized total knee arthroplasty: a systematic review and meta-analysis.保留交叉韧带的全膝关节置换术比后稳定型全膝关节置换术具有更好的10年生存率:一项系统评价和荟萃分析。
J Exp Orthop. 2023 Feb 17;10(1):19. doi: 10.1186/s40634-023-00583-2.
5
Comparison of Cruciate-Sacrificing vs Posterior-Stabilized Total Knee Replacement Using a Contemporary Total Knee System.采用当代全膝关节系统的前交叉韧带牺牲型与后稳定型全膝关节置换的比较。
J Arthroplasty. 2022 Jan;37(1):45-48. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2021.08.029. Epub 2021 Sep 2.
6
Mid-term survivorship of cruciate-retaining versus posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty using modular mini-keel tibial implants.使用模块化微型龙骨胫骨植入物的保留交叉韧带型与后稳定型全膝关节置换术的中期生存率
J Orthop Surg Res. 2018 Feb 13;13(1):35. doi: 10.1186/s13018-018-0738-9.
7
Decreased Survival of Medial Pivot Designs Compared with Cruciate-retaining Designs in TKA Without Patellar Resurfacing.非髌骨表面置换的 TKA 中,与保留交叉韧带设计相比,内侧旋转平台设计的生存率降低。
Clin Orthop Relat Res. 2020 Jun;478(6):1207-1218. doi: 10.1097/CORR.0000000000001120.
8
Anteroposterior translation and range of motion after total knee arthroplasty using posterior cruciate ligament-retaining versus posterior cruciate ligament-substituting prostheses.使用保留后交叉韧带与替代后交叉韧带假体的全膝关节置换术后前后平移及活动范围
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017 Nov;25(11):3536-3542. doi: 10.1007/s00167-016-4257-0. Epub 2016 Aug 2.
9
No difference in patellar kinematics between fixed-bearing cruciate-retaining and cruciate-substituting total knee arthroplasty: a cadaveric investigation.固定平台保留交叉韧带和替代交叉韧带全膝关节置换术之间髌股运动学无差异:一项尸体研究
Int Orthop. 2016 Apr;40(4):731-5. doi: 10.1007/s00264-015-3041-y. Epub 2015 Nov 13.
10
Cruciate-Retaining Total Knee Arthroplasty: Current Concepts Review.保留交叉韧带的全膝关节置换术:当前概念综述
Cureus. 2023 Aug 20;15(8):e43813. doi: 10.7759/cureus.43813. eCollection 2023 Aug.

引用本文的文献

1
Perioperative and Follow-Up Analyses of Primary Posterior Stabilized and Cruciate Retaining Knee Arthroplasty.初次后稳定型和保留交叉韧带型膝关节置换术的围手术期及随访分析
J Clin Med. 2025 May 27;14(11):3752. doi: 10.3390/jcm14113752.
2
Effect of posterior-stabilized and cruciate-retaining implants on three-dimensional kinematic characteristics after total knee arthroplasty.后稳定型和保留交叉韧带型假体对全膝关节置换术后三维运动学特征的影响。
Jt Dis Relat Surg. 2025 Jan 2;36(1):3-14. doi: 10.52312/jdrs.2024.1836. Epub 2024 Nov 5.
3
The performance of cruciate-retaining implants for primary total knee arthroplasty in valgus deformed knees: A systematic review.外翻畸形膝关节初次全膝关节置换中保留交叉韧带假体的性能:一项系统评价
J Orthop. 2024 Oct 9;61:97-102. doi: 10.1016/j.jor.2024.10.002. eCollection 2025 Mar.
4
Comparison of early outcomes of primary total knee arthroplasties performed using subvastus and medial parapatellar approaches and evaluation of quadriceps muscle elastography.股四头肌肌腱弹性成像在经前正中入路与髌旁内侧入路初次全膝关节置换术早期疗效比较。
Arch Orthop Trauma Surg. 2024 Nov;144(11):4839-4847. doi: 10.1007/s00402-024-05570-5. Epub 2024 Sep 23.

本文引用的文献

1
Posterior-stabilized versus cruciate-retained implants for total knee arthroplasty: a meta-analysis of clinical trials.全膝关节置换术中后稳定型与保留交叉韧带型假体的比较:一项临床试验的荟萃分析
Eur J Orthop Surg Traumatol. 2019 May;29(4):937-946. doi: 10.1007/s00590-019-02370-1. Epub 2019 Jan 16.
2
Posterior cruciate-retaining versus posterior-stabilized total knee arthroplasty for osteoarthritis with severe varus deformity.后交叉韧带保留型与后稳定型全膝关节置换术治疗重度膝内翻畸形骨关节炎
Acta Orthop Traumatol Turc. 2017 Mar;51(2):95-99. doi: 10.1016/j.aott.2016.12.008. Epub 2017 Jan 17.
3
Posterior Cruciate Ligament Retention or Substitution During Total Knee Arthroplasty Does Not Affect Long-Term Bone Mineral Density or Quality.全膝关节置换术中后交叉韧带保留或置换对长期骨密度或质量无影响。
J Arthroplasty. 2017 Apr;32(4):1148-1152. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2016.10.010. Epub 2016 Oct 26.
4
Anteroposterior translation and range of motion after total knee arthroplasty using posterior cruciate ligament-retaining versus posterior cruciate ligament-substituting prostheses.使用保留后交叉韧带与替代后交叉韧带假体的全膝关节置换术后前后平移及活动范围
Knee Surg Sports Traumatol Arthrosc. 2017 Nov;25(11):3536-3542. doi: 10.1007/s00167-016-4257-0. Epub 2016 Aug 2.
5
Posterior Cruciate Ligament Retention versus Posterior Stabilization for Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Meta-Analysis.全膝关节置换术中后交叉韧带保留与后稳定型假体的比较:一项荟萃分析
PLoS One. 2016 Jan 29;11(1):e0147865. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0147865. eCollection 2016.
6
Ten-year results comparing posterior cruciate-retaining versus posterior cruciate-substituting total knee arthroplasty.后交叉韧带保留型与后交叉韧带替代型全膝关节置换术十年结果对比
J Arthroplasty. 2015 Feb;30(2):210-5. doi: 10.1016/j.arth.2014.09.009. Epub 2014 Sep 28.
7
Survival analysis of total knee arthroplasty at a minimum 10 years' follow-up: a multicenter French nationwide study including 846 cases.10 年以上随访的全膝关节置换术的生存分析:一项包括 846 例病例的法国多中心全国性研究。
Orthop Traumatol Surg Res. 2013 Jun;99(4):385-90. doi: 10.1016/j.otsr.2013.03.014. Epub 2013 May 2.
8
Comparing navigation-based in vivo knee kinematics pre- and postoperatively between a cruciate-retaining and a cruciate-substituting implant.比较保留和替代前交叉韧带的膝关节假体术后和术前的导航下膝关节运动学。
Int Orthop. 2013 Mar;37(3):407-14. doi: 10.1007/s00264-013-1798-4. Epub 2013 Jan 30.
9
Effect of PCL on flexion-extension gaps and femoral component decision in TKA.聚己内酯对全膝关节置换术中屈伸间隙及股骨假体选择的影响。
Orthopedics. 2009 Oct;32(10 Suppl):22-5. doi: 10.3928/01477447-20090915-54.
10
Functional outcome and range of motion of high-flexion posterior cruciate-retaining and high-flexion posterior cruciate-substituting total knee prostheses. A prospective, randomized study.高屈曲后交叉韧带保留型和高屈曲后交叉韧带替代型全膝关节假体的功能结果与活动范围:一项前瞻性随机研究。
J Bone Joint Surg Am. 2009 Apr;91(4):753-60. doi: 10.2106/JBJS.H.00805.