• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

具有相关观测值的 c 最优实验设计的组合优化算法评估

Evaluation of combinatorial optimisation algorithms for c-optimal experimental designs with correlated observations.

作者信息

Watson Samuel I, Pan Yi

机构信息

Insitute of Applied Health Research, University of Birmingham, Birmingham, UK.

出版信息

Stat Comput. 2023;33(5):112. doi: 10.1007/s11222-023-10280-w. Epub 2023 Jul 29.

DOI:10.1007/s11222-023-10280-w
PMID:37525745
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10386961/
Abstract

UNLABELLED

We show how combinatorial optimisation algorithms can be applied to the problem of identifying c-optimal experimental designs when there may be correlation between and within experimental units and evaluate the performance of relevant algorithms. We assume the data generating process is a generalised linear mixed model and show that the c-optimal design criterion is a monotone supermodular function amenable to a set of simple minimisation algorithms. We evaluate the performance of three relevant algorithms: the local search, the greedy search, and the reverse greedy search. We show that the local and reverse greedy searches provide comparable performance with the worst design outputs having variance greater than the best design, across a range of covariance structures. We show that these algorithms perform as well or better than multiplicative methods that generate weights to place on experimental units. We extend these algorithms to identifying modle-robust c-optimal designs.

SUPPLEMENTARY INFORMATION

The online version contains supplementary material available at 10.1007/s11222-023-10280-w.

摘要

未标注

我们展示了组合优化算法如何应用于在实验单元之间和内部可能存在相关性的情况下识别c最优实验设计的问题,并评估相关算法的性能。我们假设数据生成过程是一个广义线性混合模型,并表明c最优设计准则是一个单调超模函数,适用于一组简单的最小化算法。我们评估了三种相关算法的性能:局部搜索、贪婪搜索和反向贪婪搜索。我们表明,在一系列协方差结构中,局部搜索和反向贪婪搜索提供了可比的性能,最差设计输出的方差大于最佳设计。我们表明,这些算法的性能与为实验单元生成权重的乘法方法一样好或更好。我们将这些算法扩展到识别模型稳健的c最优设计。

补充信息

在线版本包含可在10.1007/s11222-023-10280-w获取的补充材料。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3119/10386961/0d320bc7d98b/11222_2023_10280_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3119/10386961/18be6278c2ed/11222_2023_10280_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3119/10386961/479e8dfd4729/11222_2023_10280_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3119/10386961/816238b7b621/11222_2023_10280_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3119/10386961/ef2c8d81c73c/11222_2023_10280_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3119/10386961/5ac03c8f2613/11222_2023_10280_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3119/10386961/0d320bc7d98b/11222_2023_10280_Fig6_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3119/10386961/18be6278c2ed/11222_2023_10280_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3119/10386961/479e8dfd4729/11222_2023_10280_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3119/10386961/816238b7b621/11222_2023_10280_Fig3_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3119/10386961/ef2c8d81c73c/11222_2023_10280_Fig4_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3119/10386961/5ac03c8f2613/11222_2023_10280_Fig5_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/3119/10386961/0d320bc7d98b/11222_2023_10280_Fig6_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Evaluation of combinatorial optimisation algorithms for c-optimal experimental designs with correlated observations.具有相关观测值的 c 最优实验设计的组合优化算法评估
Stat Comput. 2023;33(5):112. doi: 10.1007/s11222-023-10280-w. Epub 2023 Jul 29.
2
Optimal study designs for cluster randomised trials: An overview of methods and results.最优的群组随机对照试验设计:方法和结果概述。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2023 Nov;32(11):2135-2157. doi: 10.1177/09622802231202379. Epub 2023 Oct 6.
3
Simple Hyper-Heuristics Control the Neighbourhood Size of Randomised Local Search Optimally for LeadingOnes.简单超启发式算法可最优地控制 LeadingOnes 的随机局部搜索的邻域大小。
Evol Comput. 2020 Fall;28(3):437-461. doi: 10.1162/evco_a_00258. Epub 2019 May 23.
4
GGA-MLP: A Greedy Genetic Algorithm to Optimize Weights and Biases in Multilayer Perceptron.GGA-MLP:一种在多层感知器中优化权重和偏差的贪婪遗传算法。
Contrast Media Mol Imaging. 2022 Feb 24;2022:4036035. doi: 10.1155/2022/4036035. eCollection 2022.
5
Datasets on statistical analysis and performance evaluation of backtracking search optimisation algorithm compared with its counterpart algorithms.与回溯搜索优化算法的对应算法相比,关于回溯搜索优化算法的统计分析和性能评估的数据集。
Data Brief. 2019 Dec 23;28:105046. doi: 10.1016/j.dib.2019.105046. eCollection 2020 Feb.
6
Sparse and optimal acquisition design for diffusion MRI and beyond.稀疏和最优采集设计在扩散 MRI 及其他领域的应用。
Med Phys. 2012 May;39(5):2499-511. doi: 10.1118/1.3700166.
7
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
8
Finding optimal design in nonlinear mixed effect models using multiplicative algorithms.利用乘法算法在非线性混合效应模型中寻找最优设计。
Comput Methods Programs Biomed. 2021 Aug;207:106126. doi: 10.1016/j.cmpb.2021.106126. Epub 2021 May 4.
9
10
MicroarrayDesigner: an online search tool and repository for near-optimal microarray experimental designs.微阵列设计器:一个用于近最优微阵列实验设计的在线搜索工具和存储库。
BMC Bioinformatics. 2009 Sep 22;10:304. doi: 10.1186/1471-2105-10-304.

引用本文的文献

1
Optimal Allocation of Observations in Stepped-Wedge and Other Cluster Studies With Correlated Cluster-Period Effects.阶梯楔形及其他具有相关群组-时期效应的群组研究中观察值的最优分配
Stat Med. 2025 Jun;44(13-14):e70100. doi: 10.1002/sim.70100.
2
Optimal study designs for cluster randomised trials: An overview of methods and results.最优的群组随机对照试验设计:方法和结果概述。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2023 Nov;32(11):2135-2157. doi: 10.1177/09622802231202379. Epub 2023 Oct 6.

本文引用的文献

1
The hunt for efficient, incomplete designs for stepped wedge trials with continuous recruitment and continuous outcome measures.寻找具有连续招募和连续结果测量的阶梯楔形试验的高效、不完整设计。
BMC Med Res Methodol. 2020 Nov 17;20(1):279. doi: 10.1186/s12874-020-01155-z.
2
Mixed-effects models for the design and analysis of stepped wedge cluster randomized trials: An overview.混合效应模型在阶梯式楔形群随机临床试验设计和分析中的应用概述。
Stat Methods Med Res. 2021 Feb;30(2):612-639. doi: 10.1177/0962280220932962. Epub 2020 Jul 6.
3
A tutorial on sample size calculation for multiple-period cluster randomized parallel, cross-over and stepped-wedge trials using the Shiny CRT Calculator.
使用 Shiny CRT Calculator 进行多周期群组随机平行、交叉和阶跃楔形试验的样本量计算教程。
Int J Epidemiol. 2020 Jun 1;49(3):979-995. doi: 10.1093/ije/dyz237.
4
Using Greedy Random Adaptive Procedure to Solve the User Selection Problem in Mobile Crowdsourcing.使用贪婪随机自适应过程解决移动众包中的用户选择问题。
Sensors (Basel). 2019 Jul 18;19(14):3158. doi: 10.3390/s19143158.
5
Information content of cluster-period cells in stepped wedge trials.阶梯楔形试验中聚类周期细胞的信息含量
Biometrics. 2019 Mar;75(1):144-152. doi: 10.1111/biom.12959. Epub 2018 Aug 23.
6
Statistical efficiency and optimal design for stepped cluster studies under linear mixed effects models.线性混合效应模型下阶梯整群研究的统计效率与最优设计
Stat Med. 2016 Jun 15;35(13):2149-66. doi: 10.1002/sim.6850. Epub 2016 Jan 7.
7
Stepped-wedge cluster randomised controlled trials: a generic framework including parallel and multiple-level designs.阶梯楔形整群随机对照试验:一个包括平行和多级设计的通用框架。
Stat Med. 2015 Jan 30;34(2):181-96. doi: 10.1002/sim.6325. Epub 2014 Oct 24.
8
Efficient algorithms for optimal designs with correlated observations in pharmacokinetics and dose-finding studies.
Biometrics. 2012 Mar;68(1):138-45. doi: 10.1111/j.1541-0420.2011.01657.x. Epub 2011 Aug 12.
9
A geometric characterization of optimal designs for regression models with correlated observations.具有相关观测值的回归模型最优设计的几何特征。
J R Stat Soc Series B Stat Methodol. 2011 Mar 1;73(2):239-252. doi: 10.1111/j.1467-9868.2010.00757.x.
10
Design and analysis of stepped wedge cluster randomized trials.阶梯楔形整群随机试验的设计与分析
Contemp Clin Trials. 2007 Feb;28(2):182-91. doi: 10.1016/j.cct.2006.05.007. Epub 2006 Jul 7.