Kalaivani Muralidasan, Prasad S Datta, Indumathi M, Sruthipriya M, Janani Balachandran, Pavankumar O
Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, Sree Balaji Dental College and Hospital, Chennai, India.
Department of Conservative Dentistry and Endodontics, CKS Theja Institute of Dental Sciences and Research, Tirupati, India.
Eur Oral Res. 2023 May 4;57(2):90-95. doi: 10.26650/eor.20231083203.
This study was to compare and evaluate the effect of home bleaching on the microhardness and flexural strength of microhybrid and nanohybrid composite resins.
The study samples were prepared using a custom-made silicon rubber mold. For microhardness evaluation, 40 disc-shaped specimens (4mm2mm) were prepared and divided into 4 groups: GROUP A (n=10): microhybrid (GC Solaire X, GC Corporation) control group, GROUP B (n=10) nanohybrid (Tetric N Ceram, Ivoclar Vivadent) control group, GROUP C (n=10): microhybrid bleaching group, GROUP D (n=10) nanohybrid bleaching group. For flexural strength evaluation, 40 bar shaped specimens (25mm2mm*2mm) were prepared. They were divided into 4 groups, GROUP 1 (n=10): microhybrid control group, GROUP 2 (n=10) nanohybrid control group, GROUP 3 (n=10): microhybrid bleaching group, GROUP 4(n=10) nanohybrid bleaching group. All the control groups were placed in artificial saliva and bleaching groups were exposed to home bleaching agent for 14 days according to manufacturer's instructions. The microhardness and flexural strength were evaluated for the respective specimens after 14 days and the data were statistically analyzed.
Home bleaching regimen decreased microhardness of both microhybrid and nanohybrid composites whereas there was no significant effect on the flexural strength. Nanohybrid composites showed greater microhardness values before and after bleaching.
Bleaching agents, irrespective of their concentration can decrease the microhardness of the composite resin samples, which raises a concern about replacement of these restorations due to the effects on physical and mechanical properties.
本研究旨在比较和评估家庭漂白对微混合和纳米混合复合树脂的显微硬度和弯曲强度的影响。
使用定制的硅橡胶模具制备研究样本。为进行显微硬度评估,制备了40个圆盘形试件(4mm×2mm),并分为4组:A组(n = 10):微混合(GC Solaire X,GC公司)对照组,B组(n = 10)纳米混合(Tetric N Ceram,义获嘉伟瓦登特公司)对照组,C组(n = 10):微混合漂白组,D组(n = 10)纳米混合漂白组。为进行弯曲强度评估,制备了40个条形试件(25mm×2mm×2mm)。它们被分为4组,第1组(n = 10):微混合对照组,第2组(n = 10)纳米混合对照组,第3组(n = 10):微混合漂白组,第4组(n = 10)纳米混合漂白组。所有对照组置于人工唾液中,漂白组根据制造商说明暴露于家庭漂白剂中14天。14天后对相应试件评估显微硬度和弯曲强度,并对数据进行统计学分析。
家庭漂白方案降低了微混合和纳米混合复合材料的显微硬度,而对弯曲强度无显著影响。纳米混合复合材料在漂白前后显示出更高的显微硬度值。
漂白剂,无论其浓度如何,都会降低复合树脂样本的显微硬度,这因对物理和机械性能的影响而引发了对这些修复体替换的担忧。