Comparison of flowmeter (transit time flow measurement) values for graft flow in three different surgical methods for isolated coronary artery bypass surgery.

BACKGROUND

Graft patency is the most important factor in coronary artery bypass surgery. This study aimed to compare the relationship between three different surgical methods and transit time flow measurement (TTFM), which is used to detect technical problems in anastomoses performed during coronary artery bypass graft operations and to correct them if necessary.

METHODS

A total of 110 patients undergoing isolated coronary artery bypass surgery were analysed. Of these patients, 48 were operated on by inducing cardiopulmonary arrest (group 1), 33 were operated on without inducing cardiac arrest (group 2) during cardiopulmonary bypass surgery, and 29 underwent surgery on the off-pump beating heart (group 3). TTFMs were performed on all the patients' grafts. Additional surgical intervention requirements, the need for intra-operative and postoperative inotropic support, and all postoperative follow-up data were compared.

RESULTS

In total, 110 patients were measured for 301 grafts. Due to insufficient measurements performed on these patients, additional surgical intervention was performed on five grafts in group 1, five grafts in group 2, and seven grafts in group 3. These interventions enabled a normal flow rate to be achieved. The number of grafts that required revision was highest in group 3. There was no difference between the groups in terms of demographic data, EuroSCORE II, preoperative ejection fraction, postoperative complications and mortality rate.

CONCLUSION

TTFM is important for detecting technical problems in grafts. We believe that all surgical methods can be applied more safely by controlling graft flow.