School of Biological Sciences, University of Bristol, 24 Tyndall Avenue, Bristol, BS8 1TQ, UK.
Evolution, Genomes, Behaviour and Ecology (UMR 9191), IDEEV, Université Paris-Saclay, CNRS, IRD, 12 route 128, Gif-sur-Yvette, 91190, France.
Biol Rev Camb Philos Soc. 2023 Dec;98(6):2226-2242. doi: 10.1111/brv.13003. Epub 2023 Aug 1.
In evolutionary terms, life is about reproduction. Yet, in some species, individuals forgo their own reproduction to support the reproductive efforts of others. Social insect colonies for example, can contain up to a million workers that actively cooperate in tasks such as foraging, brood care and nest defence, but do not produce offspring. In such societies the division of labour is pronounced, and reproduction is restricted to just one or a few individuals, most notably the queen(s). This extreme eusocial organisation exists in only a few mammals, crustaceans and insects, but strikingly, it evolved independently up to nine times in the order Hymenoptera (including ants, bees and wasps). Transitions from a solitary lifestyle to an organised society can occur through natural selection when helpers obtain a fitness benefit from cooperating with kin, owing to the indirect transmission of genes through siblings. However, this process, called kin selection, is vulnerable to parasitism and opportunistic behaviours from unrelated individuals. An ability to distinguish kin from non-kin, and to respond accordingly, could therefore critically facilitate the evolution of eusociality and the maintenance of non-reproductive workers. The question of how the hymenopteran brain has adapted to support this function is therefore a fundamental issue in evolutionary neuroethology. Early neuroanatomical investigations proposed that social Hymenoptera have expanded integrative brain areas due to selection for increased cognitive capabilities in the context of processing social information. Later studies challenged this assumption and instead pointed to an intimate link between higher social organisation and the existence of developed sensory structures involved in recognition and communication. In particular, chemical signalling of social identity, known to be mediated through cuticular hydrocarbons (CHCs), may have evolved hand in hand with a specialised chemosensory system in Hymenoptera. Here, we compile the current knowledge on this recognition system, from emitted identity signals, to the molecular and neuronal basis of chemical detection, with particular emphasis on its evolutionary history. Finally, we ask whether the evolution of social behaviour in Hymenoptera could have driven the expansion of their complex olfactory system, or whether the early origin and conservation of an olfactory subsystem dedicated to social recognition could explain the abundance of eusocial species in this insect order. Answering this question will require further comparative studies to provide a comprehensive view on lineage-specific adaptations in the olfactory pathway of Hymenoptera.
从进化的角度来看,生命是关于繁殖的。然而,在某些物种中,个体为了支持其他个体的繁殖而放弃自己的繁殖。例如,社会性昆虫群体可以包含多达 100 万只积极合作完成觅食、育雏和巢穴防御等任务的工蜂,但它们自己不会繁殖后代。在这种社会中,劳动分工非常明显,繁殖仅限于一两个个体,最显著的是女王(们)。这种极端的真社会性组织只存在于少数哺乳动物、甲壳类动物和昆虫中,但令人惊讶的是,它在膜翅目(包括蚂蚁、蜜蜂和黄蜂)中独立进化了多达 9 次。当帮手从与亲属合作中获得适应性优势时,通过兄弟姐妹间接传递基因,从独居生活方式向有组织的社会的转变可以通过自然选择发生。然而,这个过程,称为亲缘选择,容易受到寄生虫和无关个体的机会主义行为的影响。因此,区分亲属和非亲属的能力,并相应地做出反应,可能会极大地促进真社会性的进化和非繁殖工蜂的维持。因此,膜翅目昆虫大脑如何适应支持这种功能是进化神经行为学中的一个基本问题。早期的神经解剖学研究提出,社会性膜翅目昆虫由于在处理社会信息的背景下对认知能力的选择而扩大了整合脑区。后来的研究对这一假设提出了质疑,而是指出了更高的社会组织与参与识别和交流的发达感觉结构之间的密切联系。特别是,社会身份的化学信号,已知是通过表皮碳氢化合物(CHCs)介导的,可能与膜翅目昆虫中专门的化学生感系统一起进化。在这里,我们从发出的身份信号到化学检测的分子和神经元基础,综合了关于这个识别系统的最新知识,特别强调了它的进化历史。最后,我们想问一下,膜翅目昆虫社会行为的进化是否推动了其复杂嗅觉系统的扩张,或者早期专门用于社会识别的嗅觉子系统的起源和保守性是否可以解释这种昆虫目中丰富的真社会性物种。回答这个问题需要进一步的比较研究,以提供膜翅目昆虫嗅觉途径的谱系特异性适应的全面视图。