Suppr超能文献

使用通道化霍特林观察者和美国放射学会(ACR)认证模体评估光子计数探测器CT的低对比度可探测性

Evaluation of Low-contrast Detectability of Photon-Counting-Detector CT Using Channelized Hotelling Observer and an ACR Accreditation Phantom.

作者信息

Fan Mingdong, Zhou Zhongxing, Bruesewitz Michael, McCollough Cynthia, Yu Lifeng

机构信息

Department of Radiology, Mayo Clinic, Rochester, MN, 55901, USA.

出版信息

Proc SPIE Int Soc Opt Eng. 2023 Feb;12463. doi: 10.1117/12.2655619. Epub 2023 Apr 7.

Abstract

The purpose of this work is to evaluate the low-contrast detectability on a clinical whole-body photon-counting-detector (PCD)-CT scanner and compare it with an energy-integrating-detector (EID) CT scanner, using an efficient Channelized Hotelling observer (CHO)-based method previously developed and optimized on the American College of Radiology (ACR) CT accreditation phantom for routine quality control (QC) purpose. The low-contrast module of an ACR CT phantom was scanned on both the PCD-CT and EID-CT scanners, each with 10 different positionings. For PCD-CT, data were acquired at 120 kV with two major scan modes, standard resolution (SR) (collimation: 144×0.4 mm) and ultra-high-resolution (UHR) (120×0.2 mm). Images were reconstructed with two major modes: virtual monochromatic energy at 70 keV and low-energy threshold (T3D), each with filtered-backprojection (Br44) and iterative reconstruction (Br44-3) kernels. For each positioning, 3 repeated scans were acquired for each scan mode at a fixed radiation dose setting (CTDIvol = 12 mGy). For EID-CT, scans (10 positionings × 3 repeated scans) were performed at a matched CTDIvol, and images were reconstructed using the same kernels with FBP and IR. A recently developed CHO-based method dedicated for QC of low-contrast performance on the ACR phantom was applied to calculate the low-contrast detectability (d') for each scan and reconstruction condition. Results showed that there was no significant difference in low-contrast detectability (d') between the UHR mode and SR mode (p = 0.360-0.942), and the T3D reconstruction resulted in 7.7%-14.6% higher d' than 70keV (p < 0.0016). Similar detectability levels were observed on PCD-CT and EID-CT. The PCD-CT: UHR-T3D had 6.2% higher d' than EID-CT with IR (p = 0.047) and 4.1% lower d' without IR (p = 0.122).

摘要

这项工作的目的是使用一种基于通道化霍特林观察者(CHO)的高效方法,评估临床全身光子计数探测器(PCD)CT扫描仪的低对比度可探测性,并将其与能量积分探测器(EID)CT扫描仪进行比较。该方法先前已针对美国放射学会(ACR)CT认证体模进行了开发和优化,用于常规质量控制(QC)目的。在PCD-CT和EID-CT扫描仪上对ACR CT体模的低对比度模块进行扫描,每种扫描仪均有10种不同的定位。对于PCD-CT,在120 kV下以两种主要扫描模式采集数据,即标准分辨率(SR)(准直:144×0.4 mm)和超高分辨率(UHR)(120×0.2 mm)。图像采用两种主要模式重建:70 keV的虚拟单色能量和低能量阈值(T3D),每种模式均使用滤波反投影(Br44)和迭代重建(Br44-3)内核。对于每种定位,在固定辐射剂量设置(CTDIvol = 12 mGy)下,每种扫描模式采集3次重复扫描。对于EID-CT,在匹配的CTDIvol下进行扫描(10种定位×3次重复扫描),并使用相同的内核通过FBP和IR重建图像。应用一种最近开发的基于CHO的方法来计算ACR体模上低对比度性能的质量控制,以计算每种扫描和重建条件下的低对比度可探测性(d')。结果表明,UHR模式和SR模式之间的低对比度可探测性(d')无显著差异(p = 0.360 - 0.942),并且T3D重建产生的d'比70keV高7.7% - 14.6%(p < 0.0016)。在PCD-CT和EID-CT上观察到相似的可探测性水平。PCD-CT的UHR-T3D的d'比具有IR的EID-CT高6.2%(p = 0.047),比没有IR的EID-CT低4.1%(p = 0.122)。

相似文献

本文引用的文献

6
Comparison of Low Dose Performance of Photon-Counting and Energy Integrating CT.光子计数与能量积分 CT 低剂量性能比较。
Acad Radiol. 2021 Dec;28(12):1754-1760. doi: 10.1016/j.acra.2020.07.033. Epub 2020 Aug 24.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验