Cui Wenlai, Li Dong, Jiang Yueshuai, Gao Yang
School of Dance and Martial Arts, Capital University of Physical Education and Sports, Beijing, China.
Department of International Cultural Exchange, Chodang University, Muan County, Republic of Korea.
Front Physiol. 2023 Jul 17;14:1181327. doi: 10.3389/fphys.2023.1181327. eCollection 2023.
To analyze the effects of different exercise dose on lumbar spine and femoral neck bone mineral density (BMD) in individuals with osteoporosis (OP). A systematic search was conducted in four electronic databases, namely, PubMed, Embase, Web of Science, and Cochrane, with the topic of the impact of exercise on BMD in individuals with OP. Randomized controlled trials comparing exercise intervention with no intervention were identified, and changes in lumbar spine and femoral neck BMD were reported and evaluated using standardized mean difference (SMD) and 95% confidence interval (95% CI). The intervention measures in the studies were evaluated and categorized as high adherence with the exercise testing and prescription recommendations for individuals with OP developed by the American College of Sports Medicine (ACSM) or low/uncertainty adherence with ACSM recommendations. A random effects model was used to conduct meta-analyses and compare the results between subgroups. A total of 32 studies involving 2005 participants were included in the analyses, with 14 studies categorized as high adherence with ACSM recommendations and 18 studies categorized as low or uncertain adherence. In the analyses of lumbar spine BMD, 27 studies with 1,539 participants were included. The combined SMD for the high adherence group was 0.31, while the combined SMD for the low or uncertain adherence group was 0.04. In the analyses of femoral neck BMD, 23 studies with 1,606 participants were included. The combined SMD for the high adherence group was 0.45, while the combined SMD for the low or uncertain adherence group was 0.28. Within resistance exercise, the subgroup with high ACSM adherence had a greater impact on lumbar spine BMD compared to the subgroup with low or uncertain ACSM adherence (SMD: 0.08 > -0.04). Similarly, for femoral neck BMD, resistance exercise with high ACSM adherence had a higher SMD compared to exercise with low or uncertain ACSM adherence (SMD: 0.49 > 0.13). The results suggest that exercise interventions with high adherence to ACSM recommendations are more effective in improving lumbar spine and femoral neck BMD in individuals with OP compared to interventions with low or uncertain adherence to ACSM recommendations. : PROSPERO, identifier CRD42023427009.
分析不同运动剂量对骨质疏松症(OP)患者腰椎和股骨颈骨密度(BMD)的影响。在四个电子数据库,即PubMed、Embase、Web of Science和Cochrane中进行了系统检索,检索主题为运动对OP患者BMD的影响。识别出比较运动干预与无干预的随机对照试验,并使用标准化均数差(SMD)和95%置信区间(95%CI)报告和评估腰椎和股骨颈BMD的变化。对研究中的干预措施进行评估,并根据美国运动医学学院(ACSM)为OP患者制定的运动测试和处方建议,将其分类为高依从性或低/不确定依从性。使用随机效应模型进行荟萃分析,并比较亚组间的结果。分析共纳入32项研究,涉及2005名参与者,其中14项研究被分类为高依从性ACSM建议,18项研究被分类为低依从性或不确定依从性。在腰椎BMD分析中,纳入了27项研究,共1539名参与者。高依从性组的合并SMD为0.31,而低依从性或不确定依从性组的合并SMD为0.04。在股骨颈BMD分析中,纳入了23项研究,共1606名参与者。高依从性组的合并SMD为0.45,而低依从性或不确定依从性组的合并SMD为0.28。在抗阻运动中,与低依从性或不确定依从性ACSM的亚组相比,高依从性ACSM的亚组对腰椎BMD的影响更大(SMD:0.08 > -0.04)。同样,对于股骨颈BMD,高依从性ACSM的抗阻运动比低依从性或不确定依从性的运动具有更高的SMD(SMD:0.49 > 0.13)。结果表明,与低依从性或不确定依从性ACSM建议的干预措施相比,高依从性ACSM建议的运动干预在改善OP患者的腰椎和股骨颈BMD方面更有效。:PROSPERO,标识符CRD42023427009。