Suppr超能文献

头孢尼西、头孢唑林和青霉素对从血液中分离出的草绿色链球菌的体外比较评价。

Comparative in vitro evaluation of cefonicid, cefazolin, and penicillin against viridans group streptococci isolated from blood.

作者信息

Weinstein M P

出版信息

Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1986 Jul;30(1):187-8. doi: 10.1128/AAC.30.1.187.

Abstract

The in vitro activity of cefonicid against 60 strains of viridans group streptococci isolated from blood of patients with bacteremia and infective endocarditis was compared with those of cefazolin and penicillin. Cefonicid was less active than cefazolin, and both cephalosporins were less active than penicillin. The MIC50 and MIC90 for the strains tested were 0.06 and 1 microgram/ml for penicillin, 0.125 and 8 micrograms/ml for cefazolin, and 4 and 32 micrograms/ml for cefonicid.

摘要

将头孢尼西对从菌血症和感染性心内膜炎患者血液中分离出的60株草绿色链球菌的体外活性,与头孢唑林和青霉素的体外活性进行了比较。头孢尼西的活性低于头孢唑林,且两种头孢菌素的活性均低于青霉素。所测试菌株的青霉素MIC50和MIC90分别为0.06和1微克/毫升,头孢唑林为0.125和8微克/毫升,头孢尼西为4和32微克/毫升。

相似文献

2
Comparative in vitro bactericidal activity of cefonicid, ceftizoxime, and penicillin against group B streptococci.
Antimicrob Agents Chemother. 1982 Feb;21(2):344-6. doi: 10.1128/AAC.21.2.344.
3
In vitro experience with cefonicid.
Rev Infect Dis. 1984 Nov-Dec;6 Suppl 4:S783-90. doi: 10.1093/clinids/6.supplement_4.s783.
6
Comparison of cefonicid and cefazolin for treatment of soft-tissue infections.
Rev Infect Dis. 1984 Nov-Dec;6 Suppl 4:S853-6. doi: 10.1093/clinids/6.supplement_4.s853.
9
Antimicrobial susceptibility of viridans group streptococci.草绿色链球菌的抗菌药敏性。
Diagn Microbiol Infect Dis. 1997 Dec;29(4):277-80. doi: 10.1016/s0732-8893(97)00140-5.

本文引用的文献

1
Speciation of the "viridans" streptococci.“草绿色”链球菌的分类
Am J Clin Pathol. 1982 Jul;78(1):78-80. doi: 10.1093/ajcp/78.1.78.
6
In vitro experience with cefonicid.
Rev Infect Dis. 1984 Nov-Dec;6 Suppl 4:S783-90. doi: 10.1093/clinids/6.supplement_4.s783.

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验