摄入真菌蛋白、豌豆蛋白及其混合物可在抗阻训练个体中支持可比的运动后肌原纤维蛋白合成速率。

Ingestion of mycoprotein, pea protein, and their blend support comparable postexercise myofibrillar protein synthesis rates in resistance-trained individuals.

机构信息

Department of Public Health and Sport Sciences, Faculty of Health and Life Sciences, University of Exeter, Exeter, United Kingdom.

Department of Surgery, University of Texas Medical Branch, Galveston, Texas, United States.

出版信息

Am J Physiol Endocrinol Metab. 2023 Sep 1;325(3):E267-E279. doi: 10.1152/ajpendo.00166.2023. Epub 2023 Aug 2.

Abstract

Pea protein is an attractive nonanimal-derived protein source to support dietary protein requirements. However, although high in leucine, a low methionine content has been suggested to limit its anabolic potential. Mycoprotein has a complete amino acid profile which, at least in part, may explain its ability to robustly stimulate myofibrillar protein synthesis (MyoPS) rates. We hypothesized that an inferior postexercise MyoPS response would be seen following ingestion of pea protein compared with mycoprotein, which would be (partially) rescued by blending the two sources. Thirty-three healthy, young [age: 21 ± 1 yr, body mass index (BMI): 24 ± 1 kg·m] and resistance-trained participants received primed, continuous infusions of l-[-H]phenylalanine and completed a bout of whole body resistance exercise before ingesting 25 g of protein from mycoprotein (MYC, = 11), pea protein (PEA, = 11), or a blend (39% MYC, 61% PEA) of the two (BLEND, = 11). Blood and muscle samples were taken pre-, 2 h, and 4 h postexercise/protein ingestion to assess postabsorptive and postprandial postexercise myofibrillar protein fractional synthetic rates (FSRs). Protein ingestion increased plasma essential amino acid and leucine concentrations (time effect; < 0.0001), but more rapidly in BLEND and PEA compared with MYC (time × condition interaction; < 0.0001). From similar postabsorptive values (MYC, 0.026 ± 0.008%·h; PEA, 0.028 ± 0.007%·h; BLEND, 0.026 ± 0.006%·h), resistance exercise and protein ingestion increased myofibrillar FSRs (time effect; < 0.0001) over a 4-h postprandial period (MYC, 0.076 ± 0.004%·h; PEA, 0.087 ± 0.01%·h; BLEND, 0.085 ± 0.01%·h), with no differences between groups (all; > 0.05). These data show that all three nonanimal-derived protein sources have utility in supporting postexercise muscle reconditioning. This study provides evidence that pea protein (PEA), mycoprotein (MYC), and their blend (BLEND) can support postexercise myofibrillar protein synthesis rates following a bout of whole body resistance exercise. Furthermore, these data suggest that a methionine deficiency in pea may not limit its capacity to stimulate an acute increase in muscle protein synthesis (MPS).

摘要

豌豆蛋白是一种有吸引力的非动物源性蛋白质来源,可以满足饮食蛋白质的需求。然而,尽管亮氨酸含量高,但蛋氨酸含量低被认为会限制其合成代谢潜力。真菌蛋白具有完整的氨基酸谱,这至少在一定程度上可以解释其能够强烈刺激肌原纤维蛋白合成(MyoPS)的能力。我们假设,与真菌蛋白相比,豌豆蛋白在摄入后会产生较差的运动后 MyoPS 反应,而将两种来源混合使用可以部分挽救这种反应。33 名健康、年轻的[年龄:21±1 岁,体重指数(BMI):24±1kg·m]和抗阻训练的参与者接受了连续的 l-[-H]苯丙氨酸脉冲输注,并在摄入 25 克真菌蛋白(MYC,n=11)、豌豆蛋白(PEA,n=11)或两者混合(BLEND,n=11)后完成一次全身抗阻运动。在运动/蛋白质摄入后 2 小时和 4 小时采集血液和肌肉样本,以评估运动后吸收后和餐后的肌原纤维蛋白合成率(FSR)。蛋白质摄入增加了血浆必需氨基酸和亮氨酸浓度(时间效应;<0.0001),但 BLEND 和 PEA 中的增加速度快于 MYC(时间×条件相互作用;<0.0001)。从相似的吸收后值(MYC,0.026±0.008%·h;PEA,0.028±0.007%·h;BLEND,0.026±0.006%·h)开始,抗阻运动和蛋白质摄入在 4 小时的餐后期间增加了肌原纤维 FSR(时间效应;<0.0001)(MYC,0.076±0.004%·h;PEA,0.087±0.01%·h;BLEND,0.085±0.01%·h),各组之间无差异(均;>0.05)。这些数据表明,所有三种非动物源性蛋白质来源都可用于支持运动后的肌肉再训练。本研究提供的证据表明,豌豆蛋白(PEA)、真菌蛋白(MYC)及其混合物(BLEND)可在进行全身抗阻运动后支持运动后肌原纤维蛋白合成率。此外,这些数据表明,豌豆中的蛋氨酸缺乏可能不会限制其刺激肌肉蛋白质合成(MPS)急性增加的能力。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/cbee/10655824/df311fbb549c/e-00166-2023r01.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索