Faculty of Health Sciences and Sports, Macao Polytechnic University, R. de Luís Gonzaga Gomes, Macao 999078, China.
Nutrients. 2024 Aug 17;16(16):2748. doi: 10.3390/nu16162748.
Plant-based protein supplements are increasingly popular, yet their efficacy in enhancing athletic performance compared to animal protein, insect protein, or other protein types remains under investigation. This study aimed to assess the effectiveness of plant-based protein on athletic abilities such as muscle strength, endurance performance, and muscle protein synthesis (MPS) rate and compare it to no- or low-protein ingestion and non-plant protein sources. Randomized controlled trials (RCTs) evaluating the beneficial and harmful effects of plant-based protein ingestion on athletic ability in healthy individuals were considered. A systematic search of six databases yielded 2152 studies, which were screened using the Covidence systematic review tool. Thirty-one studies were included for meta-analysis after independent selection, data extraction, and risk of bias assessment by two reviewers. The meta-analysis employed a Bayesian approach using the Markov chain Monte Carlo (MCMC) method through a random-effects model. The results demonstrated that plant-based protein supplements provided greater benefits for athletic performance in healthy individuals compared to the no- or low-protein ingestion group [μ(SMD): 0.281, 95% CI: 0.159 to 0.412; heterogeneity τ: 0.18, 95% CI: 0.017 to 0.362]. However, when compared to other types of protein, plant-based protein ingestion was less effective in enhancing athletic ability [μ(SMD): -0.119, 95% CI: -0.209 to -0.028; heterogeneity τ: 0.076, 95% CI: 0.003 to 0.192]. A subgroup analysis indicated significant improvements in muscle strength and endurance performance in both young and older individuals consuming plant-based protein compared to those with no- or low-protein ingestion. Nonetheless, other protein types showed greater benefits in muscle strength compared to plant-based protein [μ(SMD): -0.133, 95% CI: -0.235 to -0.034; heterogeneity τ: 0.086, 95% CI: 0.004 to 0.214]. In conclusion, while plant-based protein ingestion demonstrates superior efficacy compared to low- or no-protein ingestion, it is not as effective as other protein types such as whey, beef, or milk protein in enhancing athletic performance in healthy individuals. Registration: Registered at the International Prospective Register of Systematic Reviews (PROSPERO) (identification code CRD42024555804).
植物性蛋白质补充剂越来越受欢迎,但与动物蛋白、昆虫蛋白或其他类型的蛋白质相比,它们在提高运动表现方面的效果仍在研究中。本研究旨在评估植物性蛋白质对肌肉力量、耐力表现和肌肉蛋白质合成(MPS)率等运动能力的有效性,并将其与无或低蛋白质摄入和非植物性蛋白质来源进行比较。研究人员考虑了评估健康个体中植物性蛋白质摄入对运动能力的有益和有害影响的随机对照试验(RCT)。通过 Covidence 系统评价工具对六个数据库进行了系统搜索,共获得 2152 项研究,然后由两名评审员独立选择、提取数据和评估偏倚风险。Meta 分析采用贝叶斯方法,通过随机效应模型使用 Markov 链蒙特卡罗(MCMC)方法。结果表明,与无或低蛋白质摄入组相比,植物性蛋白质补充剂对健康个体的运动表现有更大的益处[SMD 平均值(μ):0.281,95%置信区间(CI):0.159 至 0.412;异质性 τ:0.18,95%CI:0.017 至 0.362]。然而,与其他类型的蛋白质相比,植物性蛋白质摄入对增强运动能力的效果较差[SMD 平均值(μ):-0.119,95%CI:-0.209 至 -0.028;异质性 τ:0.076,95%CI:0.003 至 0.192]。亚组分析表明,与无或低蛋白质摄入相比,年轻和老年个体摄入植物性蛋白质均可显著提高肌肉力量和耐力表现。尽管如此,与植物性蛋白质相比,其他蛋白质类型在肌肉力量方面显示出更大的益处[SMD 平均值(μ):-0.133,95%CI:-0.235 至 -0.034;异质性 τ:0.086,95%CI:0.004 至 0.214]。总之,虽然植物性蛋白质摄入与低蛋白或无蛋白摄入相比显示出更好的效果,但与乳清、牛肉或牛奶等其他蛋白质类型相比,它在提高健康个体的运动表现方面效果较差。注册:在国际前瞻性系统评价注册库(PROSPERO)(注册号 CRD42024555804)注册。