Suppr超能文献

双相 I 型抑郁症辅助性抗抑郁维持治疗的持续时间。

Duration of Adjunctive Antidepressant Maintenance in Bipolar I Depression.

机构信息

From the Vancouver Hospital Department of Psychiatry (L.N.Y., G.S., R.W.L.) and the School of Population and Public Health (Y.O., H.W.), University of British Columbia, Vancouver, the Department of Psychiatry, University of Ottawa, Ottawa (G.S.), the Department of Psychiatry, Sunnybrook Health Sciences Centre (A.S.), and the Centre for Addiction and Mental Health (A.R., N.R.), University of Toronto, Toronto, St. Joseph's Healthcare, the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioural Neurosciences, McMaster University, Hamilton, ON (B.N.F.), Douglas Hospital, McGill University (A.D., S.B.), and Hôpital Sacré-Coeur, Université de Montréal (A.D.), Montreal, and the Department of Psychiatry, Queen's University, Providence Care, Kingston, ON (R.M.) - all in Canada; the National Institute of Mental Health and Neuro Sciences (S.S.A., M.K., K.R., N.S.M., N.K., Y.C.J.R.) and St. John's Hospital Research Institute (M.V.A.), Bangalore, ASHA Hospital, Hyderabad (M.S.R.), and Kasturba Medical College of Manipal, Manipal Academy of Higher Education, Manipal (R.P.B.) - all in India; the Department of Psychiatry and Behavioral Sciences, Johns Hopkins University School of Medicine, Baltimore (D.J.B.); and Seoul National University Bundang Hospital, Seongnam (K.H.), and Seoul National University Hospital (SNUH), Seoul (Y.M.A.) - both in South Korea.

出版信息

N Engl J Med. 2023 Aug 3;389(5):430-440. doi: 10.1056/NEJMoa2300184.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Antidepressants are used to treat acute depression in patients with bipolar I disorder, but their effect as maintenance treatment after the remission of depression has not been well studied.

METHODS

We conducted a multisite, double-blind, randomized, placebo-controlled trial of maintenance of treatment with adjunctive escitalopram or bupropion XL as compared with discontinuation of antidepressant therapy in patients with bipolar I disorder who had recently had remission of a depressive episode. Patients were randomly assigned in a 1:1 ratio to continue treatment with antidepressants for 52 weeks after remission or to switch to placebo at 8 weeks. The primary outcome, assessed in a time-to-event analysis, was any mood episode, as defined by scores on scales measuring symptoms of hypomania or mania, depression, suicidality, and mood-episode severity; additional treatment or hospitalization for mood symptoms; or attempted or completed suicide. Key secondary outcomes included the time to an episode of mania or hypomania or depression.

RESULTS

Of 209 patients with bipolar I disorder who participated in an open-label treatment phase, 150 who had remission of depression were enrolled in the double-blind phase in addition to 27 patients who were enrolled directly. A total of 90 patients were assigned to continue treatment with the prescribed antidepressant for 52 weeks (52-week group) and 87 were assigned to switch to placebo at 8 weeks (8-week group). The trial was stopped before full recruitment was reached owing to slow recruitment and funding limitations. At 52 weeks, 28 of the patients in the 52-week group (31%) and 40 in the 8-week group (46%) had a primary-outcome event. The hazard ratio for time to any mood episode in the 52-week group relative to the 8-week group was 0.68 (95% confidence interval [CI], 0.43 to 1.10; P = 0.12 by log-rank test). A total of 11 patients in the 52-week group (12%) as compared with 5 patients in the 8-week group (6%) had mania or hypomania (hazard ratio, 2.28; 95% CI, 0.86 to 6.08), and 15 patients (17%) as compared with 35 patients (40%) had recurrence of depression (hazard ratio, 0.43; 95% CI, 0.25 to 0.75). The incidence of adverse events was similar in the two groups.

CONCLUSIONS

In a trial involving patients with bipolar I disorder and a recently remitted depressive episode, adjunctive treatment with escitalopram or bupropion XL that continued for 52 weeks did not show a significant benefit as compared with treatment for 8 weeks in preventing relapse of any mood episode. The trial was stopped early owing to slow recruitment and funding limitations. (Funded by the Canadian Institutes of Health Research; ClinicalTrials.gov number, NCT00958633.).

摘要

背景

抗抑郁药用于治疗双相 I 型障碍患者的急性抑郁症,但它们作为抑郁缓解后的维持治疗的效果尚未得到很好的研究。

方法

我们进行了一项多中心、双盲、随机、安慰剂对照试验,比较了在最近缓解抑郁发作的双相 I 型障碍患者中,继续辅助使用依西酞普兰或安非他酮 XL 维持治疗与停止抗抑郁治疗的效果。患者按 1:1 的比例随机分配,在缓解后继续接受抗抑郁治疗 52 周或在 8 周时转换为安慰剂。主要结局是通过测量轻躁狂或躁狂、抑郁、自杀意念和情绪发作严重程度的量表评估的任何情绪发作;因情绪症状而额外接受治疗或住院;或企图或完成自杀。次要关键结局包括躁狂或轻躁狂或抑郁发作的时间。

结果

在参加开放性治疗阶段的 209 例双相 I 型障碍患者中,有 150 例缓解抑郁的患者除了 27 例直接入组的患者外,还参加了双盲阶段。共有 90 例患者被分配继续服用规定的抗抑郁药 52 周(52 周组),87 例患者在 8 周时转换为安慰剂(8 周组)。由于招募速度慢和资金限制,试验在完成全部招募之前提前停止。在 52 周时,52 周组的 28 例(31%)患者和 8 周组的 40 例(46%)患者出现了主要结局事件。52 周组与 8 周组相比,任何情绪发作时间的风险比为 0.68(95%置信区间[CI],0.43 至 1.10;对数秩检验 P=0.12)。52 周组有 11 例(12%)患者出现躁狂或轻躁狂,而 8 周组有 5 例(6%)患者出现躁狂或轻躁狂(风险比,2.28;95%CI,0.86 至 6.08),15 例(17%)患者出现抑郁复发,而 8 周组有 35 例(40%)患者出现抑郁复发(风险比,0.43;95%CI,0.25 至 0.75)。两组的不良事件发生率相似。

结论

在一项涉及双相 I 型障碍和最近缓解的抑郁发作患者的试验中,与 8 周的治疗相比,依西酞普兰或安非他酮 XL 的辅助治疗持续 52 周并没有显示出在预防任何情绪发作复发方面的显著益处。由于招募速度慢和资金限制,试验提前结束。(由加拿大卫生研究院资助;临床试验.gov 编号,NCT00958633。)

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验