Brual Janette, Chu Cherry, Fang Jiming, Fleury Cathleen, Stamenova Vess, Bhattacharyya Onil, Tadrous Mina
Women's College Hospital Institute for Health System Solutions and Virtual Care, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
ICES, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
PLOS Digit Health. 2023 Aug 2;2(8):e0000092. doi: 10.1371/journal.pdig.0000092. eCollection 2023 Aug.
The critical role of virtual care during the COVID-19 pandemic has raised concerns about the widening disparities to access by vulnerable populations including older immigrants. This paper aims to describe virtual care use in older immigrant populations residing in Ontario, Canada. In this population-based, repeated cross-sectional study, we used linked administrative data to describe virtual care and healthcare utilization among immigrants aged 65 years and older before and during the COVID-19 pandemic. Visits were identified weekly from January 2018 to March 2021 among various older adult immigrant populations. Among older immigrants, over 75% were high users of virtual care (had two or more virtual visits) during the pandemic. Rates of virtual care use was low (weekly average <2 visits per 1000) prior to the pandemic, but increased for both older adult immigrant and non-immigrant populations. At the start of the pandemic, virtual care use was lower among immigrants compared to non-immigrants (weekly average of 77 vs 86 visits per 1000). As the pandemic progressed, the rates between these groups became similar (80 vs 79 visits per 1000). Virtual care use was consistently lower among immigrants in the family class (75 visits per 1000) compared to the economic (82 visits per 1000) or refugee (89 visits per 1000) classes, and was lower among those who only spoke French (69 visits per 1000) or neither French nor English (73 visits per 1000) compared to those who were fluent in English (81 visits per 1000). This study found that use of virtual care was comparable between older immigrants and non-immigrants overall, though there may have been barriers to access for older immigrants early on in the pandemic. However, within older immigrant populations, immigration category and language ability were consistent differentiators in the rates of virtual care use throughout the pandemic.
虚拟医疗在新冠疫情期间的关键作用引发了人们对包括老年移民在内的弱势群体在获取医疗服务方面差距不断扩大的担忧。本文旨在描述居住在加拿大安大略省的老年移民群体对虚拟医疗的使用情况。在这项基于人群的重复横断面研究中,我们使用关联的行政数据来描述新冠疫情之前和期间65岁及以上移民的虚拟医疗和医疗服务利用情况。在2018年1月至2021年3月期间,每周对各类老年移民群体的就诊情况进行识别。在老年移民中,超过75%的人在疫情期间是虚拟医疗的高使用者(进行了两次或更多次虚拟就诊)。在疫情之前,虚拟医疗的使用率较低(每周平均每1000人就诊次数<2次),但老年移民和非移民群体的使用率都有所上升。在疫情开始时,移民的虚拟医疗使用率低于非移民(每周平均每1000人就诊77次对86次)。随着疫情的发展,这些群体之间的使用率变得相似(每1000人就诊80次对79次)。与经济类(每1000人就诊82次)或难民类(每1000人就诊89次)移民相比,家庭类移民的虚拟医疗使用率一直较低(每1000人就诊75次),与英语流利的移民(每1000人就诊81次)相比,只会说法语(每1000人就诊69次)或既不会说法语也不会说英语(每1000人就诊73次)的移民的使用率较低。这项研究发现,总体而言,老年移民和非移民在虚拟医疗使用方面具有可比性,尽管在疫情初期老年移民获取虚拟医疗服务可能存在障碍。然而,在老年移民群体中,移民类别和语言能力在整个疫情期间都是虚拟医疗使用率的持续差异因素。