Dagher Lilas, Nedunchezhian Saihariharan, El Hajjar Abdel Hadi, Zhang Yichi, Deffer Orlando, Russell Ashley, Pottle Christopher, Marrouche Nassir
Tulane Research Innovation and Arrhythmia Discoveries-TRIAD Center, Tulane University School of Medicine, New Orleans, Louisiana.
Cardiovasc Digit Health J. 2022 Feb;3(1):31-39. doi: 10.1016/j.cvdhj.2021.10.007. Epub 2021 Nov 18.
COVID-19 boosted healthcare digitalization and personalization in cardiology. However, understanding patient attitudes and engagement behaviors is essential to achieve successful acceptance and implementation of digital health technologies in personalized care.
This study aims to understand current and future trends in wearable device and telemedicine use in the cardiology clinic patient population, recognize patients' attitude towards digital health before and after COVID-19, and identify potential socioeconomic and racial/ethnic differences in adoption of digital health tools in a New Orleans patient population.
A cross-sectional survey was distributed to Tulane Cardiology Clinic patients between September 2020 and January 2021. Basic demographic information, medical comorbidities, device usage, and opinions on digital health tools were collected.
Survey responses from 299 participants (average age = 54 years, 50.8% female, 24.4% African American) showed that digital health use was more prevalent in younger, healthier, and more educated individuals. Wearable use was also higher among White patients compared to African American patients. Patients cited costs and technology knowledge as primary deterrents for using wearables, despite being more inclined to use wearables for disease monitoring (41%). While wearable use did not increase after COVID-19 (36.6% pre-COVID vs 35.4% post-COVID, = .77), telemedicine use rose significantly (10.8% pre-COVID vs 24.3% during COVID, < .0001). Patients mostly noted telemedicine's effectiveness in overcoming difficult healthcare access barriers. Additionally, most patients are in support of wearables and telemedicine either complementing or replacing routine tests and traditional clinical visits.
Demographic and socioeconomic disparities negatively impact wearable health device and telemedicine adoption within cardiovascular clinic patients. Although telemedicine use increased after COVID-19, this effect was not observed for wearables, reflecting significant economic and digital literacy challenges underlying wearable acceptance.
新冠疫情推动了心脏病学领域的医疗数字化和个性化。然而,了解患者的态度和参与行为对于在个性化医疗中成功接受和应用数字健康技术至关重要。
本研究旨在了解心脏病门诊患者群体中可穿戴设备和远程医疗使用的当前及未来趋势,认识新冠疫情前后患者对数字健康的态度,并确定新奥尔良患者群体在采用数字健康工具方面潜在的社会经济和种族/民族差异。
2020年9月至2021年1月期间,对杜兰心脏病学诊所的患者进行了一项横断面调查。收集了基本人口统计学信息、合并症、设备使用情况以及对数字健康工具的看法。
299名参与者(平均年龄 = 54岁,50.8%为女性,24.4%为非裔美国人)的调查回复显示,数字健康的使用在更年轻、更健康、受教育程度更高的个体中更为普遍。与非裔美国患者相比,白人患者的可穿戴设备使用率也更高。尽管患者更倾向于使用可穿戴设备进行疾病监测(41%),但他们认为成本和技术知识是使用可穿戴设备的主要障碍。虽然新冠疫情后可穿戴设备的使用并未增加(疫情前为36.6%,疫情后为35.4%,P = 0.77),但远程医疗的使用显著上升(疫情前为10.8%,疫情期间为24.3%,P < 0.0001)。患者大多指出远程医疗在克服医疗获取困难障碍方面的有效性。此外,大多数患者支持可穿戴设备和远程医疗补充或取代常规检查和传统临床就诊。
人口统计学和社会经济差异对心血管门诊患者采用可穿戴健康设备和远程医疗产生负面影响。尽管新冠疫情后远程医疗的使用有所增加,但可穿戴设备并未出现这种情况,这反映了可穿戴设备接受度背后存在重大的经济和数字素养挑战。