Department of Applied Physiology and Kinesiology, Laboratory for Rehabilitation Neuroscience, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Department of Neurology, Fixel Institute for Neurological Diseases, University of Florida, Gainesville, FL, USA.
Curr Neuropharmacol. 2024;22(10):1583-1605. doi: 10.2174/1570159X21666230801140648.
Parkinsonian disorders are a heterogeneous group of incurable neurodegenerative diseases that significantly reduce quality of life and constitute a substantial economic burden. Nuclear imaging (NI) and magnetic resonance imaging (MRI) have played and continue to play a key role in research aimed at understanding and monitoring these disorders. MRI is cheaper, more accessible, nonirradiating, and better at measuring biological structures and hemodynamics than NI. NI, on the other hand, can track molecular processes, which may be crucial for the development of efficient diseasemodifying therapies. Given the strengths and weaknesses of NI and MRI, how can they best be applied to Parkinsonism research going forward? This review aims to examine the effectiveness of NI and MRI in three areas of Parkinsonism research (differential diagnosis, prodromal disease identification, and disease monitoring) to highlight where they can be most impactful. Based on the available literature, MRI can assist with differential diagnosis, prodromal disease identification, and disease monitoring as well as NI. However, more work is needed, to confirm the value of MRI for monitoring prodromal disease and predicting phenoconversion. Although NI can complement or be a substitute for MRI in all the areas covered in this review, we believe that its most meaningful impact will emerge once reliable Parkinsonian proteinopathy tracers become available. Future work in tracer development and high-field imaging will continue to influence the landscape for NI and MRI.
帕金森病是一组不可治愈的神经退行性疾病,其严重降低了生活质量,并构成了巨大的经济负担。核医学成像(NI)和磁共振成像(MRI)在旨在理解和监测这些疾病的研究中发挥了并将继续发挥关键作用。MRI 比 NI 更便宜、更普及、无辐射,并且更擅长测量生物结构和血液动力学。另一方面,NI 可以追踪分子过程,这对于开发有效的疾病修饰疗法可能至关重要。鉴于 NI 和 MRI 的优缺点,它们如何才能最好地应用于帕金森病研究的未来?本综述旨在检查 NI 和 MRI 在帕金森病研究的三个领域(鉴别诊断、前驱期疾病识别和疾病监测)中的有效性,以突出它们最具影响力的地方。基于现有文献,MRI 可辅助鉴别诊断、前驱期疾病识别和疾病监测,以及 NI。然而,需要更多的工作来证实 MRI 在前驱期疾病监测和预测表型转化方面的价值。尽管 NI 可以在本综述涵盖的所有领域中补充或替代 MRI,但我们相信,一旦出现可靠的帕金森蛋白病示踪剂,其意义将更加深远。示踪剂开发和高场成像方面的未来工作将继续影响 NI 和 MRI 的发展。