Lunen Jonas Christian, Rugulies Reiner, Sørensen Jeppe K, Andersen Lars L, Clausen Thomas
Department of Psychosocial Work Environment, National Research Centre for the Working Environment, Copenhagen, Denmark.
Department of Occupational Health and Social Medicine, Holbæk Hospital, Holbæk, Denmark.
Eur J Public Health. 2023 Oct 10;33(5):821-827. doi: 10.1093/eurpub/ckad118.
BACKGROUND: Most studies on the psychosocial working environment have focused on evaluating the isolated effect of individual psychosocial work factors or looked at effects through a lens of theories such as job strain or effort-reward imbalance. However, to fathom the intricate nature of workers' experience of occupational strain, there is a need to investigate the combined and cumulative effects of multiple exposures to psychosocial work factors on workers' health. METHODS: In this prospective cohort study, we created an additive index (range 0-4) on number of baseline exposures to quantitative demands, emotional demands, role conflicts, and workplace bullying. Via logistic regression and Cox regression, we estimated the association between the additive index of psychosocial work factors and depressive disorder and long-term sickness absence (LTSA). We assessed the onset of depressive disorder using the Major Depression Inventory at 6-month follow-up and the onset of LTSA using a national register during 12-month follow-up. RESULTS: For onset of depressive disorder, high exposure to any one [odds ratio (OR) 2.98], two (OR 3.14), three (OR 6.44) and all four (OR 9.62) adverse psychosocial work factors predicted a statistically significant increased risk. For onset of LTSA, high exposure to any one [hazard ratio (HR) 1.13], two (HR 1.67), three (HR 2.31) and all four (HR 4.04) psychosocial work factors predicted an increased risk. The two latter associations were statistically significant. Trend tests indicated an exposure-response relationship for both outcomes. CONCLUSIONS: Workers reporting exposure to multiple adverse psychosocial work factors had a higher risk of developing depressive disorder and LTSA.
背景:大多数关于社会心理工作环境的研究都集中在评估个体社会心理工作因素的单独影响,或者通过工作压力或努力-回报失衡等理论视角来考察影响。然而,为了深入了解工人职业压力体验的复杂本质,有必要研究多次接触社会心理工作因素对工人健康的综合和累积影响。 方法:在这项前瞻性队列研究中,我们根据基线时接触定量需求、情感需求、角色冲突和职场霸凌的次数创建了一个累加指数(范围为0至4)。通过逻辑回归和Cox回归,我们估计了社会心理工作因素累加指数与抑郁症及长期病假(LTSA)之间的关联。我们在6个月随访时使用《重度抑郁量表》评估抑郁症的发病情况,并在12个月随访期间使用国家登记册评估LTSA的发病情况。 结果:对于抑郁症的发病,高暴露于任何一种(优势比[OR]2.98)、两种(OR 3.14)、三种(OR 6.44)和所有四种(OR 9.62)不良社会心理工作因素均预测风险有统计学显著增加。对于LTSA的发病,高暴露于任何一种(风险比[HR]1.13)、两种(HR 1.67)、三种(HR 2.31)和所有四种(HR 4.04)社会心理工作因素均预测风险增加。后两种关联具有统计学显著性。趋势检验表明两种结局均存在暴露-反应关系。 结论:报告接触多种不良社会心理工作因素的工人患抑郁症和LTSA的风险更高。
Eur J Public Health. 2023-10-10
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2016-5-1
Saf Health Work. 2024-12
J Affect Disord. 2022-12-15
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2022-11-1
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2021-10-1
Scand J Work Environ Health. 2019-6-27