Smela Beata, Toumi Mondher, Świerk Karolina, Francois Clement, Biernikiewicz Małgorzata, Clay Emilie, Boyer Laurent
Assignity, Cracow, Poland.
Public Health Department, Aix-Marseille University, Marseille, France.
J Mark Access Health Policy. 2023 Jul 28;11(1):2241234. doi: 10.1080/20016689.2023.2241234. eCollection 2023.
A rapid literature review (RLR) is an alternative to systematic literature review (SLR) that can speed up the analysis of newly published data. The objective was to identify and summarize available information regarding different approaches to defining RLR and the methodology applied to the conduct of such reviews. The Medline and EMBASE databases, as well as the grey literature, were searched using the set of keywords and their combination related to the targeted and rapid review, as well as design, approach, and methodology. Of the 3,898 records retrieved, 12 articles were included. Specific definition of RLRs has only been developed in 2021. In terms of methodology, the RLR should be completed within shorter timeframes using simplified procedures in comparison to SLRs, while maintaining a similar level of transparency and minimizing bias. Inherent components of the RLR process should be a clear research question, search protocol, simplified process of study selection, data extraction, and quality assurance. There is a lack of consensus on the formal definition of the RLR and the best approaches to perform it. The evidence-based supporting methods are evolving, and more work is needed to define the most robust approaches.
快速文献综述(RLR)是系统文献综述(SLR)的一种替代方法,它可以加快对新发表数据的分析。目的是识别和总结关于定义RLR的不同方法以及进行此类综述所应用的方法的现有信息。使用与目标和快速综述以及设计、方法和方法论相关的关键词及其组合,对Medline和EMBASE数据库以及灰色文献进行了检索。在检索到的3898条记录中,纳入了12篇文章。RLR的具体定义直到2021年才得以确定。在方法论方面,与SLR相比,RLR应在更短的时间内使用简化程序完成,同时保持类似的透明度水平并尽量减少偏差。RLR过程的固有组成部分应该是一个明确的研究问题、检索方案、简化的研究选择过程、数据提取和质量保证。关于RLR的正式定义和进行RLR的最佳方法缺乏共识。基于证据的支持方法正在不断发展,需要更多的工作来确定最可靠的方法。