• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

一份针对老龄化的卫生系统响应性高优先级指标的简短清单:一项电子德尔菲共识研究。

A short list of high-priority indicators of health system responsiveness for aging: an eDelphi consensus study.

作者信息

Gonzalez-Bautista Emmanuel, Morsch Patricia, Gonzalez Cynthia, Vega Enrique

机构信息

Gerontopole Toulouse University Hospital Toulouse France Gerontopole, Toulouse University Hospital, Toulouse, France.

Health Systems and Services Pan American Health Organization Washington, D.C. United States of America Health Systems and Services, Pan American Health Organization, Washington, D.C., United States of America.

出版信息

Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2023 Aug 2;47:e103. doi: 10.26633/RPSP.2023.103. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.26633/RPSP.2023.103
PMID:37534053
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10392236/
Abstract

The objective of this article was to provide a consensus-based short list of effective indicators to measure health system responsiveness to the needs of older adults which would be relevant to informing public policy. An e-Delphi study was done with no direct interaction between respondents. Virtual surveys were sent to 141 participants with experience in analysis and monitoring of health indicators, management of health systems, and health care of older adults. A baseline list of 24 previously published indicators was used. The criteria for selection as high priority indicators were: usefulness as a tracer of health system responsiveness and usefulness to inform policy. Consensus was defined as: ≥70% agreement among the participants that the indicator was very high or high priority; plus being benchmarked by ≥50% of respondents as having a higher relative weight than other indicators; plus being in the top 10 in the ranking list. The first round of the process included 38 participants with varied professional backgrounds. Consensus was reached for seven indicators after two rounds. Five indicators were related to distal outcomes (mortality, disability, or healthy life expectancy), one to monitoring functional assessments, and one to poverty levels. Health systems professionals should consider these comprehensive priority indicators in their efforts to provide a better health system for older people.

摘要

本文的目的是提供一份基于共识的有效指标简短清单,以衡量卫生系统对老年人需求的响应能力,这将有助于为公共政策提供参考。开展了一项电子德尔菲研究,参与者之间没有直接互动。向141名在卫生指标分析与监测、卫生系统管理以及老年人医疗保健方面有经验的参与者发送了虚拟调查问卷。使用了一份包含24个先前已发表指标的基线清单。选为高度优先指标的标准是:作为卫生系统响应能力的追踪指标有用,以及对政策制定有参考价值。共识的定义为:≥70%的参与者认为该指标为非常高或高优先级;加上≥50%的受访者将其作为比其他指标具有更高相对权重的基准;加上在排名列表中位列前十。该过程的第一轮有38名专业背景各异的参与者。两轮之后就七个指标达成了共识。五个指标与远端结果(死亡率、残疾率或健康预期寿命)相关,一个与功能评估监测相关,一个与贫困水平相关。卫生系统专业人员在努力为老年人提供更好的卫生系统时应考虑这些综合优先指标。

相似文献

1
A short list of high-priority indicators of health system responsiveness for aging: an eDelphi consensus study.一份针对老龄化的卫生系统响应性高优先级指标的简短清单:一项电子德尔菲共识研究。
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2023 Aug 2;47:e103. doi: 10.26633/RPSP.2023.103. eCollection 2023.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Prioritising models of healthcare service delivery for a more sustainable health system: a Delphi study of Australian health policy, clinical practice and management, academic and consumer stakeholders.优先考虑医疗服务提供模式,以建立更具可持续性的卫生系统:对澳大利亚卫生政策、临床实践和管理、学术和消费者利益相关者的德尔菲研究。
Aust Health Rev. 2021 Aug;45(4):425-432. doi: 10.1071/AH20160.
4
Identification and Prioritization of Quality Indicators for Conservative Kidney Management.保守性肾脏管理质量指标的识别和优先级排序。
Am J Kidney Dis. 2019 Feb;73(2):174-183. doi: 10.1053/j.ajkd.2018.08.014. Epub 2018 Oct 25.
5
Assessing health system responsiveness to the needs of older people.评估卫生系统对老年人需求的响应能力。
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2021 Sep 30;45:e127. doi: 10.26633/RPSP.2021.127. eCollection 2021.
6
Consented indicators for the evaluation of integrated strategies of community health promotion targeting children and adolescents: results of an eDelphi.同意指标用于评估以儿童和青少年为目标的社区健康促进综合策略:一项电子德尔菲研究的结果。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Jan 22;24(1):252. doi: 10.1186/s12889-023-17370-4.
7
Clinical indicators to identify neuropathic pain in low back related leg pain: a modified Delphi study.识别腰腿痛相关性神经病理性疼痛的临床指标:一项改良德尔菲研究
BMC Musculoskelet Disord. 2020 Sep 8;21(1):601. doi: 10.1186/s12891-020-03600-y.
8
Identification of quality indicators of public health nursing practice: "modified Delphi" approach.公共卫生护理实践质量指标的确定:“修正德尔菲法”。
Public Health Nurs. 2022 Jan;39(1):214-228. doi: 10.1111/phn.13000. Epub 2021 Oct 25.
9
Establishing consensus on key public health indicators for the monitoring and evaluating childhood obesity interventions: a Delphi panel study.就监测和评估儿童肥胖干预措施的关键公共卫生指标达成共识:一项德尔菲专家小组研究。
BMC Public Health. 2020 Nov 17;20(1):1733. doi: 10.1186/s12889-020-09814-y.
10
European e-Delphi process to define expert consensus on electrochemotherapy treatment indications, procedural aspects, and quality indicators in melanoma.欧洲电子德尔菲流程,旨在确定电化学疗法治疗黑色素瘤的适应证、程序方面和质量指标的专家共识。
Br J Surg. 2023 Jun 12;110(7):818-830. doi: 10.1093/bjs/znad105.

引用本文的文献

1
Using Large Language Models to Enhance Exercise Recommendations and Physical Activity in Clinical and Healthy Populations: Scoping Review.利用大语言模型增强临床和健康人群的运动建议及身体活动:范围综述
JMIR Med Inform. 2025 May 27;13:e59309. doi: 10.2196/59309.
2
Identification and prioritization of population health indices in Iranian population, a qualitative study.伊朗人群健康指数的识别与优先排序:一项定性研究
BMC Public Health. 2025 May 20;25(1):1856. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22985-w.

本文引用的文献

1
Creating an anti-ageist healthcare system to improve care for our current and future selves.创建一个反年龄歧视的医疗保健系统,以改善对当下及未来自身的护理。
Nat Aging. 2021 Feb;1(2):150-152. doi: 10.1038/s43587-020-00004-4.
2
Implementation of the WHO integrated care for older people (ICOPE) programme in clinical practice: a prospective study.WHO 老年人综合关怀(ICOPE)方案在临床实践中的实施:一项前瞻性研究。
Lancet Healthy Longev. 2022 Jun;3(6):e394-e404. doi: 10.1016/S2666-7568(22)00097-6. Epub 2022 Jun 9.
3
Assessing health system responsiveness to the needs of older people.评估卫生系统对老年人需求的响应能力。
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2021 Sep 30;45:e127. doi: 10.26633/RPSP.2021.127. eCollection 2021.
4
Delphi methodology in healthcare research: How to decide its appropriateness.医疗保健研究中的德尔菲法:如何确定其适用性。
World J Methodol. 2021 Jul 20;11(4):116-129. doi: 10.5662/wjm.v11.i4.116.
5
Health system responsiveness: a systematic evidence mapping review of the global literature.卫生系统响应性:全球文献系统证据制图综述。
Int J Equity Health. 2021 May 1;20(1):112. doi: 10.1186/s12939-021-01447-w.
6
Decision-making and health system strengthening: bringing time frames into perspective.决策与卫生系统强化:审视时间框架
Health Policy Plan. 2020 Nov 20;35(9):1254-1261. doi: 10.1093/heapol/czaa086.
7
Mortality due to low-quality health systems in the universal health coverage era: a systematic analysis of amenable deaths in 137 countries.全民健康覆盖时代低质量卫生系统导致的死亡:137 个国家可避免死亡的系统分析。
Lancet. 2018 Nov 17;392(10160):2203-2212. doi: 10.1016/S0140-6736(18)31668-4. Epub 2018 Sep 5.
8
What is health systems responsiveness? Review of existing knowledge and proposed conceptual framework.什么是卫生系统反应性?现有知识综述与概念框架建议
BMJ Glob Health. 2017 Oct 31;2(4):e000486. doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2017-000486. eCollection 2017.
9
Using and reporting the Delphi method for selecting healthcare quality indicators: a systematic review.运用和报告德尔菲法选择医疗质量指标:系统评价。
PLoS One. 2011;6(6):e20476. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0020476. Epub 2011 Jun 9.
10
Effective exercise for the prevention of falls: a systematic review and meta-analysis.预防跌倒的有效运动:系统评价与荟萃分析
J Am Geriatr Soc. 2008 Dec;56(12):2234-43. doi: 10.1111/j.1532-5415.2008.02014.x.