• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

伊朗人群健康指数的识别与优先排序:一项定性研究

Identification and prioritization of population health indices in Iranian population, a qualitative study.

作者信息

Roohravan Benis Mahshid, Rampisheh Zahra, Motamed-Gorji Nogol, Solhi Mahnaz, Tayefi Batool

机构信息

Preventive Medicine and Public Health Research Center, Psychosocial Health Research Institute, Department of Community and Family Medicine, School of Medicine, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

Colorectal Research Center, Rasool Akram Hospital, Iran University of Medical Sciences, Tehran, Iran.

出版信息

BMC Public Health. 2025 May 20;25(1):1856. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22985-w.

DOI:10.1186/s12889-025-22985-w
PMID:40394529
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12090397/
Abstract

INTRODUCTION

A population health index is a combination of two or more health indicators, used to evaluate different dimensions of health in a population. While various population health indices have been developed globally, there remains a gap in systematically identifying and prioritizing such indices tailored to the Iranian context. This study aims to identify and prioritize population health indices relevant to the Iranian context using expert consensus through the Delphi method.

METHODOLOGY

A multi-methodology with two steps was employed in this study. Firstly, a comprehensive list of existing composite health indicators was identified by reviewing the literature. In the second stage, the review results were used as input for a web-based Delphi survey involving 22 experts across two rounds. After two rounds, a list of indices that gained at least 70% of consensus and a mean score of 2.5 out of 5 was prepared.

RESULTS

In the initial phase of the study, a refined set of 21 indices emerged. Participation rates for the first and second rounds were 72% and 68%, respectively. A total of 21 indices were assessed, and after refining them based on expert feedback, the following five indices were determined to have the highest priority after two rounds: Disability-Adjusted Life Year (4.23 ± 0.32), UHC Service Coverage index (3.96 ± 0.25), Sustainable Development Goals index (3.78 ± 0.31), Human Development Index (3.58 ± 0.36), Quality-Adjusted Life Year (3.58 ± 0.37). The Inter-rater reliability test found significant absolute agreement among experts in the second round (ICC: 0.970, 95% CI: 0.931-0.989).

CONCLUSION

This study's contribution lies in offering a compilation of composite health indicators, which can guide forthcoming research on the health measurement of the Iranian population. Furthermore, the study underscores the value of involving expert professionals and soliciting diverse perspectives in selecting health indices.

摘要

引言

人群健康指数是两个或更多健康指标的组合,用于评估人群健康的不同维度。虽然全球已开发出各种人群健康指数,但在系统识别和优先排序适合伊朗国情的此类指数方面仍存在差距。本研究旨在通过德尔菲法,利用专家共识来识别与伊朗国情相关的人群健康指数并确定其优先顺序。

方法

本研究采用了分两步的多方法。首先,通过文献回顾确定了现有综合健康指标的详尽清单。在第二阶段,将回顾结果用作两轮基于网络的德尔菲调查的输入,该调查涉及22名专家。两轮之后,编制了一份获得至少70%共识且平均得分为5分制中2.5分的指数清单。

结果

在研究的初始阶段,出现了一组经过提炼的21个指数。第一轮和第二轮的参与率分别为72%和68%。总共评估了21个指数,并根据专家反馈对其进行提炼,两轮之后确定以下五个指数具有最高优先级:伤残调整生命年(4.23±0.32)、全民健康覆盖服务覆盖指数(3.96±0.25)、可持续发展目标指数(3.78±0.31)、人类发展指数(3.58±0.36)、质量调整生命年(3.58±0.37)。评分者间信度检验发现第二轮专家之间存在显著的绝对一致性(组内相关系数:0.970,95%置信区间:0.931 - 0.989)。

结论

本研究的贡献在于提供了一份综合健康指标汇编,可指导未来关于伊朗人群健康测量的研究。此外,该研究强调了在选择健康指数时让专家专业人员参与并征求不同意见的价值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5102/12090397/7191ac107155/12889_2025_22985_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5102/12090397/7191ac107155/12889_2025_22985_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/5102/12090397/7191ac107155/12889_2025_22985_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Identification and prioritization of population health indices in Iranian population, a qualitative study.伊朗人群健康指数的识别与优先排序:一项定性研究
BMC Public Health. 2025 May 20;25(1):1856. doi: 10.1186/s12889-025-22985-w.
2
Folic acid supplementation and malaria susceptibility and severity among people taking antifolate antimalarial drugs in endemic areas.在流行地区,服用抗叶酸抗疟药物的人群中,叶酸补充剂与疟疾易感性和严重程度的关系。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Feb 1;2(2022):CD014217. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD014217.
3
Indicators for evaluating European population health: a Delphi selection process.评估欧洲人口健康的指标:德尔菲选择过程。
BMC Public Health. 2018 Apr 27;18(1):557. doi: 10.1186/s12889-018-5463-0.
4
Key indicators for appraising adolescent sexual and reproductive health in South Asia: international expert consensus exercise using the Delphi technique.评估南亚青少年性与生殖健康的关键指标:使用德尔菲技术的国际专家共识实践
Glob Health Action. 2020 Dec 31;13(1):1830555. doi: 10.1080/16549716.2020.1830555.
5
360-degree Delphi: addressing sociotechnical challenges of healthcare IT.360 度德尔菲法:应对医疗信息技术的社会技术挑战。
BMC Med Inform Decis Mak. 2020 Jun 5;20(1):101. doi: 10.1186/s12911-020-1071-x.
6
Identification and prioritization of food insecurity and vulnerability indices in iran.伊朗粮食不安全与脆弱性指数的识别与优先级确定
Iran J Public Health. 2015 Feb;44(2):244-53.
7
Policy options to address the effectiveness of health service management graduates in solving Iranian health system challenges: a mixed scoping review and policy Delphi approach.应对卫生服务管理专业毕业生解决伊朗卫生系统挑战有效性的政策选择:混合式范围综述与政策德尔菲法
EClinicalMedicine. 2024 Oct 5;77:102875. doi: 10.1016/j.eclinm.2024.102875. eCollection 2024 Nov.
8
Identifying research priorities for public health research to address health inequalities: use of Delphi-like survey methods.确定公共卫生研究的优先事项以解决健康不平等问题:使用类似德尔菲法的调查方法。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2017 Oct 9;15(1):87. doi: 10.1186/s12961-017-0252-2.
9
Construction of nursing-sensitive quality indicators for acute poisoning in emergency departments: An e-Delphi study.构建急诊科急性中毒护理敏感质量指标:一项电子德尔菲研究。
J Adv Nurs. 2024 Nov;80(11):4736-4749. doi: 10.1111/jan.16266. Epub 2024 Jun 14.
10
Indicators of outcome quality in peripheral arterial disease revascularisations - a Delphi expert consensus.外周动脉疾病血运重建结局质量指标——德尔菲专家共识
Vasa. 2018 Oct;47(6):491-497. doi: 10.1024/0301-1526/a000720. Epub 2018 Jun 1.

本文引用的文献

1
Direct and indirect effects of economic sanctions on health: a systematic narrative literature review.经济制裁对健康的直接和间接影响:系统叙事文献综述。
BMC Public Health. 2024 Aug 17;24(1):2242. doi: 10.1186/s12889-024-19750-w.
2
A Delphi consensus to identify the key screening tests/questions for a digital neurological examination for epidemiological research.一项德尔菲共识,旨在确定用于流行病学研究的数字神经学检查的关键筛查测试/问题。
J Neurol. 2024 May;271(5):2694-2703. doi: 10.1007/s00415-024-12254-y. Epub 2024 Feb 20.
3
A short list of high-priority indicators of health system responsiveness for aging: an eDelphi consensus study.
一份针对老龄化的卫生系统响应性高优先级指标的简短清单:一项电子德尔菲共识研究。
Rev Panam Salud Publica. 2023 Aug 2;47:e103. doi: 10.26633/RPSP.2023.103. eCollection 2023.
4
Effect of healthy lifestyle index and lifestyle patterns on the risk of mortality: A community-based cohort study.健康生活方式指数和生活方式模式对死亡风险的影响:一项基于社区的队列研究。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2022 Aug 30;9:920760. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2022.920760. eCollection 2022.
5
Challenges and opportunities for Iranian global health diplomacy: lessons learned from action for prevention and control of noncommunicable diseases.伊朗全球卫生外交的挑战与机遇:从预防和控制非传染性疾病行动中汲取的经验教训。
Health Res Policy Syst. 2021 Dec 24;19(1):152. doi: 10.1186/s12961-021-00800-3.
6
Health indices for the evaluation and monitoring of health in children and adolescents in prevention and health promotion: a scoping review.健康指标在儿童和青少年预防和健康促进中的健康评估和监测中的应用:范围综述。
BMC Public Health. 2021 Dec 20;21(1):2309. doi: 10.1186/s12889-021-12335-x.
7
Coming to consensus: the Delphi technique.达成共识:德尔菲技术。
Eur J Cardiovasc Nurs. 2021 Oct 27;20(7):692-695. doi: 10.1093/eurjcn/zvab059.
8
Focus on disability-free life expectancy: implications for health-related quality of life.关注无残疾预期寿命:对健康相关生活质量的影响。
Qual Life Res. 2021 Aug;30(8):2187-2195. doi: 10.1007/s11136-021-02809-1. Epub 2021 Mar 17.
9
Delphi consensus recommendations on how to provide cardiovascular rehabilitation in the COVID-19 era.德尔福共识建议:如何在 COVID-19 时代提供心血管康复服务。
Eur J Prev Cardiol. 2021 May 14;28(5):541-557. doi: 10.1093/eurjpc/zwaa080.
10
The value proposition of the Global Health Security Index.全球卫生安全指数的价值主张。
BMJ Glob Health. 2020 Oct;5(10). doi: 10.1136/bmjgh-2020-003648.