Suppr超能文献

非阿片类镇痛药和区域技术在腹腔镜妇科手术围手术期疼痛管理中的疗效:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。

Efficacy of nonopioid analgesics and regional techniques for perioperative pain management in laparoscopic gynecological surgery: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.

机构信息

The First Clinical Medical College, Lanzhou University.

Department of Anesthesiology, The First Hospital of Lanzhou University, Lanzhou, Gansu Province, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Int J Surg. 2023 Nov 1;109(11):3527-3540. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000630.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

The optimal approach for perioperative pain management in laparoscopic gynecological surgery is unclear due to a lack of comprehensive analysis, which limits the development of evidence-based enhanced recovery after surgery protocols. This study aimed to conduct a systematic review and network meta-analysis to support clinical decision-making for optimal analgesia.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

This study conducted a systematic literature search in PubMed, Embase, CENTRAL, Web of Science, and CINAHL from inception to 3 December 2021, and updated on 19 August 2022. Randomized controlled trials comparing the perioperative use of nonopioid analgesics and regional techniques in adults undergoing elective laparoscopic gynecological surgery under general anesthesia were included in the analysis, either alone or in combination. The co-analgesic interventions during the perioperative period for the intervention and control groups of each eligible study were also considered. We assessed the risk of bias using the Risk of Bias 2 tool and evaluated the certainty of evidence using the Confidence in Network Meta-Analysis (CINeMA) approach. A Bayesian network meta-analysis was used to estimate the efficacy of the analgesic strategies. The primary outcomes were pain score at rest and cumulative oral morphine milligram equivalents at 24 h postoperatively.

RESULTS

Overall, 108 studies with 9582 participants and 35 different interventions were included. Compared with inert treatments, combinations of two or more interventions showed better efficacy and longer duration in reducing postoperative pain and opioid consumption within 24 h than monotherapies, and showed stepwise enhanced effects with increasing analgesic modes. In combination therapies, regional techniques that included peripheral nerve blocks and intraperitoneal local anesthetics, in combination with nonopioid systemic analgesics, or combining local anesthetics with adjuvant drugs, were found to be more effective. Monotherapies were found to be mostly ineffective. The most effective peripheral nerve blocks were found to be ultrasound-guided transversus abdominis plane block with adjuvant and ultrasound-guided quadratus lumborum block.

CONCLUSIONS

These results provide robust evidence for the routine use of regional techniques in combination with nonopioid analgesics in perioperative pain management. However, further better quality and larger trials are needed, considering the low confidence levels for certain interventions.

摘要

背景

由于缺乏全面分析,腹腔镜妇科手术围手术期疼痛管理的最佳方法仍不明确,这限制了基于循证的术后加速康复协议的发展。本研究旨在进行系统评价和网络荟萃分析,以支持最佳镇痛的临床决策。

材料和方法

本研究对 PubMed、Embase、CENTRAL、Web of Science 和 CINAHL 从建库至 2021 年 12 月 3 日进行了系统文献检索,并于 2022 年 8 月 19 日进行了更新。纳入了在全身麻醉下接受择期腹腔镜妇科手术的成年人中,比较围手术期单独或联合使用非阿片类镇痛药和区域技术的随机对照试验。还考虑了每个合格研究的干预组和对照组的围手术期共镇痛干预。我们使用风险偏倚 2 工具评估风险偏倚,并使用置信网络荟萃分析(CINeMA)方法评估证据确定性。使用贝叶斯网络荟萃分析估计镇痛策略的疗效。主要结局是术后 24 小时内静息时的疼痛评分和累积口服吗啡毫克当量。

结果

总体而言,纳入了 108 项研究,共 9582 名参与者和 35 种不同的干预措施。与惰性治疗相比,两种或更多种干预措施的联合在 24 小时内减轻术后疼痛和阿片类药物消耗方面具有更好的疗效和更长的持续时间,并且随着镇痛模式的增加,效果呈逐步增强。在联合治疗中,包括外周神经阻滞和腹腔内局部麻醉的区域技术,与非阿片类全身镇痛药联合使用,或联合使用局部麻醉剂和辅助药物,被发现更有效。单一疗法被发现大多无效。最有效的外周神经阻滞被发现是超声引导腹横肌平面阻滞加辅助和超声引导腰方肌阻滞。

结论

这些结果为围手术期疼痛管理中常规使用区域技术联合非阿片类镇痛药提供了有力证据。然而,考虑到某些干预措施的置信水平较低,还需要进一步开展高质量和更大规模的试验。

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验