• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

预测剖宫产手术术后镇痛不足及不良反应的高危因素:一项前瞻性研究。

Predicting high-risk factors for postoperative inadequate analgesia and adverse reactions in cesarean delivery surgery: a prospective study.

作者信息

Zhang Kaiwen, Jiao Bo, Sun Jiaoli, Zhang Xianwei, Zhang Guanglei, Li Ningbo, Liu Baowen, Zhou Zhiqiang

机构信息

Department of Anesthesiology and Pain Medicine, Hubei Key Laboratory of Geriatric Anesthesia and Perioperative Brain Health, and Wuhan Clinical Research Center for Geriatric Anesthesia, Tongji Hospital, Tongji Medical College, Huazhong University of Science and Technology, Wuhan, People's Republic of China.

出版信息

Int J Surg. 2025 Jun 1;111(6):3859-3875. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000002354. Epub 2025 Apr 3.

DOI:10.1097/JS9.0000000000002354
PMID:40505037
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC12165530/
Abstract

BACKGROUND

Early identification of high-risk factors for inadequate analgesia and adverse reactions in obstetric patients is critical for improving outcomes. This study developed a machine learning model to predict these factors and optimize anesthesia management in obstetric surgery.

MATERIAL AND METHODS

This prospective study included 763 obstetric patients who underwent elective cesarean delivery between December 2023 and May 2024. A machine-learning model for postoperative analgesia and adverse reactions (MLPIAAR) was constructed using 42 variables categorized into preoperative (18), intraoperative (12), and postoperative (12) factors. Ten algorithms were applied for model development. Model performance was optimized through 10-fold cross-validation and GridSearchCV. Evaluation metrics included receiver operating characteristic, area under the curve, accuracy, and precision. Model interpretability was enhanced using SHapley Additive exPlanations (SHAP). Regression analysis explored PCA compression frequency, consumption, and satisfaction of PCA factors. Validation was performed using predicted values and scatter plots.

RESULTS

Our study found 24.25% of patients experienced inadequate postoperative analgesia within 24 h. Postoperative nausea also occurred in 23.20% of patients. Simultaneously using dexamethasone and flurbiprofen axetil reduced both risks. However, pregnancy-induced hypertension and intraoperative shivering increased nausea risk. Postoperative vomiting occurred in 11.80% of patients, primarily associated with intravenous PCA type. Hydromorphone PCA showed a higher vomiting incidence than nalbuphine PCA. Intraoperative nausea and vomiting increased postoperative vomiting risk. Patients receiving diclofenac sodium and those with longer surgeries exhibited higher PCA compression frequencies and consumption. Higher preoperative Edinburgh Postnatal Depression Scale scores correlated with increased PCA consumption.

CONCLUSIONS

The MLPIAAR model predicted high-risk factors for inadequate analgesia, nausea, and vomiting in obstetric patients. Dexamethasone and flurbiprofen axetil reduced these risks, while hydromorphone PCA increased vomiting risk compared to nalbuphine PCA. Machine learning and SHAP are valuable for optimizing anesthesia and analgesia management in obstetrics.

摘要

背景

早期识别产科患者镇痛不足和不良反应的高危因素对于改善预后至关重要。本研究开发了一种机器学习模型来预测这些因素并优化产科手术中的麻醉管理。

材料与方法

这项前瞻性研究纳入了2023年12月至2024年5月期间接受择期剖宫产的763例产科患者。使用42个变量构建了术后镇痛和不良反应的机器学习模型(MLPIAAR),这些变量分为术前(18个)、术中(12个)和术后(12个)因素。应用十种算法进行模型开发。通过十折交叉验证和GridSearchCV优化模型性能。评估指标包括受试者工作特征曲线、曲线下面积、准确性和精确性。使用SHapley加法解释(SHAP)增强模型可解释性。回归分析探讨了PCA因素的压缩频率、消耗量和满意度。使用预测值和散点图进行验证。

结果

我们的研究发现24.25%的患者在24小时内术后镇痛不足。23.20%的患者还出现了术后恶心。同时使用地塞米松和氟比洛芬酯可降低这两种风险。然而,妊娠期高血压和术中寒战会增加恶心风险。11.80%的患者出现术后呕吐,主要与静脉PCA类型有关。氢吗啡酮PCA的呕吐发生率高于纳布啡PCA。术中恶心和呕吐会增加术后呕吐风险。接受双氯芬酸钠的患者和手术时间较长的患者PCA压缩频率和消耗量较高。术前爱丁堡产后抑郁量表得分较高与PCA消耗量增加相关。

结论

MLPIAAR模型预测了产科患者镇痛不足、恶心和呕吐的高危因素。地塞米松和氟比洛芬酯降低了这些风险,而与纳布啡PCA相比,氢吗啡酮PCA增加了呕吐风险。机器学习和SHAP对于优化产科麻醉和镇痛管理具有重要价值。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f380/12165530/c4fa7ea3ef98/js9-111-3859-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f380/12165530/5c217a5d775c/js9-111-3859-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f380/12165530/57144b86dbe1/js9-111-3859-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f380/12165530/76a93e4bf8e2/js9-111-3859-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f380/12165530/82529be5b023/js9-111-3859-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f380/12165530/e96ebe7feadd/js9-111-3859-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f380/12165530/8c35f04809ca/js9-111-3859-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f380/12165530/c4fa7ea3ef98/js9-111-3859-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f380/12165530/5c217a5d775c/js9-111-3859-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f380/12165530/57144b86dbe1/js9-111-3859-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f380/12165530/76a93e4bf8e2/js9-111-3859-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f380/12165530/82529be5b023/js9-111-3859-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f380/12165530/e96ebe7feadd/js9-111-3859-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f380/12165530/8c35f04809ca/js9-111-3859-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/f380/12165530/c4fa7ea3ef98/js9-111-3859-g007.jpg

相似文献

1
Predicting high-risk factors for postoperative inadequate analgesia and adverse reactions in cesarean delivery surgery: a prospective study.预测剖宫产手术术后镇痛不足及不良反应的高危因素:一项前瞻性研究。
Int J Surg. 2025 Jun 1;111(6):3859-3875. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000002354. Epub 2025 Apr 3.
2
Dexmedetomidine Added to Sufentanil Patient-Controlled Intravenous Analgesia Relieves the Postoperative Pain after Cesarean Delivery: A Prospective Randomized Controlled Multicenter Study.右美托咪定复合舒芬太尼用于剖宫产术后患者自控静脉镇痛的效果:一项前瞻性随机对照多中心研究。
Sci Rep. 2018 Jul 2;8(1):9952. doi: 10.1038/s41598-018-27619-3.
3
Development and assessment of novel machine learning models to predict the probability of postoperative nausea and vomiting for patient-controlled analgesia.开发和评估新型机器学习模型以预测患者自控镇痛术后恶心呕吐的概率。
Sci Rep. 2023 Apr 20;13(1):6439. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-33807-7.
4
Prospective investigation of intravenous patient-controlled analgesia with hydromorphone or sufentanil: impact on mood, opioid adverse effects, and recovery.氢吗啡酮或舒芬太尼静脉自控镇痛的前瞻性研究:对情绪、阿片类药物不良反应及恢复的影响
BMC Anesthesiol. 2018 Apr 10;18(1):37. doi: 10.1186/s12871-018-0500-1.
5
Machine learning for prediction of postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients with intravenous patient-controlled analgesia.机器学习预测静脉自控镇痛患者术后恶心呕吐。
PLoS One. 2022 Dec 22;17(12):e0277957. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0277957. eCollection 2022.
6
Effect of patient-controlled analgesia on development of postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients undergoing microvascular decompression: a prospective randomized controlled trial.患者自控镇痛对微血管减压术后恶心呕吐发展的影响:一项前瞻性随机对照试验。
J Neurosurg. 2024 Feb 9;141(1):260-267. doi: 10.3171/2023.12.JNS231817. Print 2024 Jul 1.
7
Factors Associated With Postoperative Pain Trajectory, Nausea, and Vomiting After Total Knee Arthroplasty: A Retrospective Study.全膝关节置换术后疼痛轨迹、恶心和呕吐的相关因素:一项回顾性研究
Clin J Pain. 2025 Mar 1;41(3):e1270. doi: 10.1097/AJP.0000000000001270.
8
Comparison of postoperative pain between patients who underwent primary and repeated cesarean section: a prospective cohort study.初次剖宫产与再次剖宫产术后疼痛的比较:前瞻性队列研究。
BMC Anesthesiol. 2019 Oct 22;19(1):189. doi: 10.1186/s12871-019-0865-9.
9
Risk assessment of postoperative nausea and vomiting in the intravenous patient-controlled analgesia environment: predictive values of the Apfel's simplified risk score for identification of high-risk patients.静脉患者自控镇痛环境下术后恶心呕吐的风险评估:阿普菲尔简化风险评分对识别高危患者的预测价值。
Yonsei Med J. 2013 Sep;54(5):1273-81. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2013.54.5.1273.
10
Incidence and risk factors of postoperative nausea and vomiting in patients with fentanyl-based intravenous patient-controlled analgesia and single antiemetic prophylaxis.使用基于芬太尼的静脉自控镇痛和单一止吐预防措施的患者术后恶心呕吐的发生率及危险因素
Yonsei Med J. 2014 Sep;55(5):1430-5. doi: 10.3349/ymj.2014.55.5.1430.

本文引用的文献

1
Analgesia efficacy of erector spinae plane block in laparoscopic abdominal surgeries: a systemic review and meta-analysis.竖脊肌平面阻滞在腹腔镜腹部手术中的镇痛效果:系统评价和荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2024 Jul 1;110(7):4393-4401. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001421.
2
Online interpretable dynamic prediction models for clinically significant posthepatectomy liver failure based on machine learning algorithms: a retrospective cohort study.基于机器学习算法的肝切除术后具有临床意义的肝衰竭在线可解释动态预测模型:一项回顾性队列研究
Int J Surg. 2024 Nov 1;110(11):7047-7057. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001764.
3
Emergence of Artificial Intelligence and Machine Learning Models in Sudden Cardiac Arrest: A Comprehensive Review of Predictive Performance and Clinical Decision Support.
人工智能和机器学习模型在心脏骤停中的应用:预测性能和临床决策支持的综合综述
Cardiol Rev. 2024 Jun 5. doi: 10.1097/CRD.0000000000000708.
4
The STROCSS 2024 guideline: strengthening the reporting of cohort, cross-sectional, and case-control studies in surgery.STROCSS 2024 指南:加强外科手术中队列研究、横断面研究和病例对照研究的报告。
Int J Surg. 2024 Jun 1;110(6):3151-3165. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001268.
5
Development of interpretable machine learning models for prediction of acute kidney injury after noncardiac surgery: a retrospective cohort study.非心脏手术后急性肾损伤预测的可解释机器学习模型的开发:一项回顾性队列研究。
Int J Surg. 2024 May 1;110(5):2950-2962. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000001237.
6
Efficacy and safety of patient-controlled intravenous analgesia after APS team standardized postoperative pain management: A 6-year experience of an acute pain service in 107802 Chinese patients.APS团队标准化术后疼痛管理后患者自控静脉镇痛的疗效与安全性:一家急性疼痛服务机构对107802例中国患者的6年经验
Heliyon. 2024 Jan 19;10(2):e24387. doi: 10.1016/j.heliyon.2024.e24387. eCollection 2024 Jan 30.
7
High dose glucocorticoids for treatment of postoperative pain: A systematic review of the literature and meta-analysis.大剂量糖皮质激素治疗术后疼痛:系统评价文献和荟萃分析。
J Clin Anesth. 2024 May;93:111352. doi: 10.1016/j.jclinane.2023.111352. Epub 2023 Dec 13.
8
Risk stratification of papillary thyroid cancers using multidimensional machine learning.使用多维度机器学习对甲状腺乳头状癌进行风险分层
Int J Surg. 2024 Jan 1;110(1):372-384. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000814.
9
Illness severity assessment of older adults in critical illness using machine learning (ELDER-ICU): an international multicentre study with subgroup bias evaluation.使用机器学习评估危重症老年患者的疾病严重程度(ELDER-ICU):一项具有亚组偏倚评估的国际多中心研究。
Lancet Digit Health. 2023 Oct;5(10):e657-e667. doi: 10.1016/S2589-7500(23)00128-0. Epub 2023 Aug 18.
10
Efficacy of nonopioid analgesics and regional techniques for perioperative pain management in laparoscopic gynecological surgery: a systematic review and network meta-analysis.非阿片类镇痛药和区域技术在腹腔镜妇科手术围手术期疼痛管理中的疗效:系统评价和网络荟萃分析。
Int J Surg. 2023 Nov 1;109(11):3527-3540. doi: 10.1097/JS9.0000000000000630.