Philip Jennifer, Le Brian, La Brooy Camille, Olver Ian, Kerridge Ian, Komesaroff Paul
Department of Medicine, University of Melbourne, Victoria Pde, Fitzroy 3065, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Palliative Care Service, St Vincent's Hospital, Melbourne, Victoria, Australia.
Curr Treat Options Oncol. 2023 Oct;24(10):1351-1364. doi: 10.1007/s11864-023-01126-8. Epub 2023 Aug 3.
In considering the impact of medically hastened death (MHD) on cancer care, a wide range of variables needs to be considered including demographic factors, diagnoses, local cultural factors, and the legislative frameworks in place. Here, we present a synthesis of recently available published literature and empirical data collected following legislative change to enable MHD in Victoria, Australia to explore in detail the potential impact of MHD on cancer care with a focus on patients/families and professional groups. Our findings reveal that for patients and families, both physical and existential distress frequently underlie MHD requests, with the latter less readily recognised by health professionals. The responses of those around the patient making the request may have a very significant impact on relationships within families and upon the nature of the subsequent bereavement. For palliative care, while differing views may remain, it appears that there has been some accommodation of MHD into or alongside practice over time. The recognition of a shared commitment to relief of suffering of palliative care and MHD appears a helpful means of establishing how these practices may co-exist. In cancer practice more broadly, as individual professionals reflect upon their own roles, new relationships and pathways of patient movement (or referral) must be established in response to patients' requests. Our findings also highlight many unanswered questions in understanding the impact of MHD, including that upon those dying who choose not to access MHD, First Nations peoples, the participating health professionals' longer term, and the relief of suffering itself. A systematic approach to the evaluation of MHD legislation must be adopted in order to understand its full impact. Only then could it be determined if the aspirations for such legislative change were being met.
在考虑医学加速死亡(MHD)对癌症护理的影响时,需要考虑一系列广泛的变量,包括人口统计学因素、诊断、当地文化因素以及现有的立法框架。在此,我们综合了近期已发表的文献以及澳大利亚维多利亚州立法变更后收集的实证数据,以详细探讨MHD对癌症护理的潜在影响,重点关注患者/家庭和专业群体。我们的研究结果表明,对于患者和家庭而言,身体痛苦和生存痛苦常常是提出MHD请求的潜在原因,而后者较难被医疗专业人员所识别。提出请求的患者周围人的反应可能会对家庭关系以及随后的丧亲之痛的性质产生非常重大的影响。对于姑息治疗,尽管可能仍然存在不同观点,但随着时间的推移,MHD似乎已在一定程度上融入或与实践并行。认识到姑息治疗和MHD在减轻痛苦方面的共同承诺,似乎是确定这些实践如何共存的有益方式。在更广泛的癌症实践中,随着个体专业人员反思自己的角色,必须根据患者的请求建立新的关系和患者转移(或转诊)途径。我们的研究结果还凸显了在理解MHD的影响方面存在许多未解答的问题,包括对那些选择不接受MHD的临终者、原住民、参与的医疗专业人员的长期影响以及痛苦本身的减轻。必须采用系统的方法来评估MHD立法,以便了解其全面影响。只有这样,才能确定这种立法变革的目标是否得以实现。