Department of Surgery, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
Institute of Health Policy, Management and Evaluation, Dalla Lana School of Public Health, University of Toronto, Toronto, Ontario, Canada.
JAMA Netw Open. 2023 Aug 1;6(8):e2327109. doi: 10.1001/jamanetworkopen.2023.27109.
Colorectal cancer (CRC) is uncommon in adults younger than 50 years of age, so this population may experience delays to treatment that contribute to advanced stage and poor survival.
To investigate whether there is an association between time from presentation to treatment and survival in younger adults with CRC.
DESIGN, SETTING, AND PARTICIPANTS: This retrospective cohort study used linked population-based data in Ontario, Canada. Participants included patients with CRC aged younger than 50 years who were diagnosed in Ontario between 2007 and 2018. Analysis was performed between December 2019 and December 2022.
Administrative and billing codes were used to identify the number of days between the date of first presentation and treatment initiation (overall interval).
The associations between increasing overall interval, overall survival (OS), and cause-specific survival (CSS) were explored with restricted cubic spline regression. Multivariable Cox proportional hazards models were also fit for OS and CSS, adjusted for confounders. Analyses were repeated in a subset of patients with lower urgency, defined as those who did not present emergently, did not have metastatic disease, did not have cross-sectional imaging or endoscopy within 14 days of first presentation, and had an overall interval of at least 28 days duration.
Among 5026 patients included, the median (IQR) age was 44.0 years (40.0-47.0 years); 2412 (48.0%) were female; 1266 (25.2%) had metastatic disease and 1570 (31.2%) had rectal cancer. The lower-urgency subset consisted of 2548 patients. The median (IQR) overall interval was 108 days (55-214 days) (15.4 weeks [7.9-30.6 weeks]). Patients with metastatic CRC had shorter median (IQR) overall intervals (83 days [39-183 days]) compared with those with less advanced disease. Five-year overall survival was 69.8% (95% CI, 68.4%-71.1%). Spline regression showed younger patients with shorter overall intervals (<108 days) had worse OS and CSS with no significant adverse outcomes of longer overall intervals. In adjusted Cox models, overall intervals longer than 18 weeks were not associated with significantly worse OS or CSS compared with those waiting 12 to 18 weeks (OS: HR, 0.83 [95% CI, 0.67-1.03]; CSS: HR, 0.90 [95% CI, 0.69-1.18]). Results were similar in the subset of lower-urgency patients, and when stratified by stage.
In this cohort study of 5026 patients with CRC aged younger than 50 years of age in Ontario, time from presentation to treatment was not associated with advanced disease or poor survival. These results suggest that targeting postpresentation intervals may not translate to improved outcomes on a population level.
50 岁以下成年人的结直肠癌(CRC)并不常见,因此该人群可能会因治疗延误而导致疾病进展和生存预后较差。
调查在年轻的 CRC 患者中,从就诊到治疗的时间与生存之间是否存在关联。
设计、地点和参与者:本回顾性队列研究使用了加拿大安大略省的基于人群的关联数据。参与者包括在安大略省诊断为年龄小于 50 岁的 CRC 患者,诊断时间为 2007 年至 2018 年。分析于 2019 年 12 月至 2022 年 12 月进行。
使用管理和计费代码来确定从首次就诊到开始治疗的天数(总间隔)。
使用受限三次样条回归探讨了总间隔增加与总生存期(OS)和特定原因生存期(CSS)之间的关联。还针对 OS 和 CSS 拟合了多变量 Cox 比例风险模型,并对混杂因素进行了调整。在较低紧急程度的患者亚组中重复了分析,该亚组定义为未紧急就诊、无转移性疾病、首次就诊后 14 天内无横断面成像或内镜检查以及总间隔至少为 28 天的患者。
在纳入的 5026 例患者中,中位(IQR)年龄为 44.0 岁(40.0-47.0 岁);2412 例(48.0%)为女性;1266 例(25.2%)有转移性疾病,1570 例(31.2%)为直肠癌。较低紧急程度的亚组包括 2548 例患者。中位(IQR)总间隔为 108 天(55-214 天)(15.4 周[7.9-30.6 周])。转移性 CRC 患者的中位(IQR)总间隔(83 天[39-183 天])比非晚期疾病患者更短。5 年总生存率为 69.8%(95%CI,68.4%-71.1%)。样条回归显示,总间隔较短(<108 天)的年轻患者 OS 和 CSS 更差,但总间隔较长(>18 周)无明显不良后果。在调整后的 Cox 模型中,与等待 12 至 18 周相比,总间隔超过 18 周与 OS 或 CSS 无显著相关性(OS:HR,0.83[95%CI,0.67-1.03];CSS:HR,0.90[95%CI,0.69-1.18])。在较低紧急程度的患者亚组中以及分层后,结果相似。
在安大略省的这项 5026 例年龄小于 50 岁的 CRC 患者队列研究中,从就诊到治疗的时间与晚期疾病或生存预后不良无关。这些结果表明,针对就诊后间隔可能不会转化为人群水平的改善结局。