Jalink Matthew, King Will D, Anderson Benjamin O, Sutradhar Rinku, Tørring Marie Louise, Brundage Michael D, Groome Patti A, Chan Kelvin K W, Urquhart Robin, Peng Yingwei, Eskander Antoine, Grover Surbhi, Raphael Michael J, Grieve Richard, Laub Cassidy, Booth Christopher M, Hanna Timothy P
Department of Public Health Sciences, Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Division of Cancer Care and Epidemiology, Sinclair Cancer Research Institute at Queen's University, Kingston, ON, Canada.
Br J Cancer. 2025 Sep 5. doi: 10.1038/s41416-025-03158-3.
The duration from diagnosis to primary treatment initiation (DTI) is an important interval for patients with cancer, as delayed treatment has been found to be associated with heightened recurrence rates and worsened survival. Studying the association between DTI duration and overall survival (OS) is biased and confounded by clinical triaging, heterogeneous definitions, and variation in analytic approaches.
To develop consensus-based guidance for conducting studies investigating the association of DTI duration and OS.
A multidisciplinary panel was recruited to participate in a three-round modified Delphi approach to develop consensus recommendations on the best methodological practices when studying the association between DTI duration and OS.
The Delphi panel consisted of 15 experts in the fields of epidemiology, biostatistics, health services research, oncology, and health policy. A list of 24 recommendations with accompanying elaborations was generated including variable definition and measurement, cohort creation, confounder control, pertinent biases, analytic techniques, and balanced interpretation of results.
Providing valid evidence of the DTI effect on OS requires careful approaches. This paper offers recommendations on how to improve methodological quality. This will ensure that future studies effectively contribute to evidence-informed practice decisions on appropriate waiting times for patients with cancer.
从诊断到开始初次治疗的时间(DTI)对癌症患者来说是一个重要的时间间隔,因为已发现延迟治疗与更高的复发率和更差的生存率相关。研究DTI持续时间与总生存期(OS)之间的关联存在偏差,且受到临床分诊、定义不统一以及分析方法差异的影响。
制定基于共识的指南,用于开展调查DTI持续时间与OS之间关联的研究。
招募了一个多学科小组,采用三轮改良德尔菲法,就研究DTI持续时间与OS之间关联时的最佳方法实践制定共识性建议。
德尔菲小组由流行病学、生物统计学、卫生服务研究、肿瘤学和卫生政策领域的15名专家组成。生成了一份包含24条建议及详细阐述的清单,内容包括变量定义与测量、队列创建、混杂因素控制、相关偏差、分析技术以及结果的平衡解读。
要提供DTI对OS影响的有效证据,需要谨慎的方法。本文就如何提高方法学质量提供了建议。这将确保未来的研究能有效地为关于癌症患者适当等待时间的循证实践决策做出贡献。