Samudra Rhucha P, Heboyan Vahé
Department of Social Sciences, Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia (Dr Samudra); and Health Economics and Policy Division, Department of Population Health Sciences, Medical College of Georgia, Augusta University, Augusta, Georgia (Dr Heboyan).
J Public Health Manag Pract. 2023;29(6):E284-E292. doi: 10.1097/PHH.0000000000001786. Epub 2023 Aug 1.
To estimate the impact of county-level income, access to food, availability of health resources, socioeconomic factors, and state political ideology on population obesity and mental health in US counties.
We compiled a county-level data set from the US Census, County Health Rankings, USDA Food Environment Atlas, the American Community Survey, and the State Ideology Database. We specify 2 multivariable regression models for county-level obesity rate and per capita poor mental health days and control for rurality, food access, income, availability of health care resources, state political ideology, and socioeconomic characteristics.
We find that higher food access reduces obesity in counties; an increase in per capita full-service restaurants by 1 unit is associated with reduction in obesity rate by 1.24 points and an increase in per capita grocery stores reduces poor mental health days by 0.14. We also find that counties in liberal-leaning states tend to have lower obesity rates. Access to primary care providers (increase in primary care physicians by 1 is associated with decline in obesity rate by 1.18 points and poor mental health days by 0.11 days), and recreational facilities (increase in recreational facilities per 1000 by 1 is associated with reduction in obesity rate by 3.16 points and poor mental health days by 0.47 days) reduces obesity rates and poor mental health days. Median income is associated with decrease in obesity rate and poor mental health days. Increase in median household income by 1% is associated with reduction in obesity rate 4.75% and reduction in poor mental health days by 1.39 days.
We find that access to food and health care at county level and state ideology through policy making affects health outcomes. Our analysis indicates that counties can improve access to food and health care by investing in these services thereby improving county-level health outcomes and save dollars in the process.
评估美国各县县级收入、食物获取情况、卫生资源可用性、社会经济因素以及州政治意识形态对人口肥胖和心理健康的影响。
我们从美国人口普查、县卫生排名、美国农业部食品环境地图集、美国社区调查和州意识形态数据库中汇编了一个县级数据集。我们为县级肥胖率和人均心理健康不佳天数指定了两个多变量回归模型,并对农村地区、食物获取、收入、医疗资源可用性、州政治意识形态和社会经济特征进行控制。
我们发现,更好的食物获取情况可降低各县的肥胖率;人均提供全方位服务的餐厅数量每增加1个单位,肥胖率降低1.24个百分点,人均杂货店数量增加可使心理健康不佳天数减少0.14天。我们还发现,倾向自由派的州的县往往肥胖率较低。获得初级保健提供者(初级保健医生数量每增加1名,肥胖率下降1.18个百分点,心理健康不佳天数下降0.11天)以及娱乐设施(每1000人娱乐设施数量增加1个,肥胖率降低3.16个百分点,心理健康不佳天数减少0.47天)可降低肥胖率和心理健康不佳天数。收入中位数与肥胖率和心理健康不佳天数的减少相关。家庭收入中位数每增加1%,肥胖率降低4.75%,心理健康不佳天数减少1.39天。
我们发现县级的食物和医疗获取情况以及通过政策制定的州意识形态会影响健康结果。我们的分析表明,各县可以通过投资这些服务来改善食物和医疗获取情况,从而改善县级健康结果,并在此过程中节省资金。