Benedek Csilla, Kerekes-Máthé Bernadette, Bereșescu Liana, Buka Imola Zsuzsa, Bardocz-Veres Zsuzsanna, Geréb Ildikó, Mártha Krisztina Ildikó, Jánosi Kinga Mária
Department of Periodontology and Oral Diagnosis, "George Emil Palade" University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science and Technology of Târgu Mureș, 540142 Târgu Mureș, Romania.
Department of Tooth and Dental Arch Morphology, "George Emil Palade" University of Medicine, Pharmacy, Science and Technology of Târgu Mureș, 540142 Târgu Mureș, Romania.
Diagnostics (Basel). 2024 Jul 19;14(14):1573. doi: 10.3390/diagnostics14141573.
The scientific literature is increasingly focused on peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis, which are biological outcomes of dental implant treatment.
BACKGROUND/OBJECTIVES: The present study aimed to evaluate the two most critical complications of dental implantation, peri-implant mucositis and peri-implantitis, through the prism of different influencing factors.
We followed 40 patients, with a total number of 92 dental implants, divided into three age groups: under 35 years, between 35 and 55 years, and older than 55 years. Patients were also divided into groups according to the time since implant placement: 1-3 years, 4-7 years, and more than 7 years. The patients were examined, and periodontal pocket depth, peri-implant pocket depth, Löe-Silness gingival index, mucosal thickness, and keratinized mucosal width were recorded; bone resorption was measured on radiographs using a 2D image analysis method; and a questionnaire was also conducted.
Bone resorption was highest in the 35-55 age group (3.09 ± 0.04 mm) and for implants placed 4-7 years ago (3.39 ± 0.12 mm). Females had a mean bone resorption of 3.4 ± 0.15 mm and males of 2.45 ± 0.07 mm. Statistically, there was a significant difference only in the Löe-Silness index: the 35-55 age group had the highest values ( = 0.04).
There were no statistically significant differences between the time since implant placement and the degree of bone resorption, nor between sexes. Peri-implant inflammation may occur at any age, regardless of the lifetime of the implants.
科学文献越来越关注种植体周围黏膜炎和种植体周围炎,它们是牙种植治疗的生物学结果。
背景/目的:本研究旨在通过不同影响因素的视角评估牙种植的两种最关键并发症,即种植体周围黏膜炎和种植体周围炎。
我们跟踪了40例患者,共92颗牙种植体,分为三个年龄组:35岁以下、35至55岁、55岁以上。患者还根据种植体植入后的时间分组:1至3年、4至7年、7年以上。对患者进行检查,记录牙周袋深度、种植体周围袋深度、洛 - 西伦牙龈指数、黏膜厚度和角化黏膜宽度;使用二维图像分析方法在X线片上测量骨吸收情况;并进行问卷调查。
骨吸收在35至55岁年龄组最高(3.09±0.04毫米),在4至7年前植入的种植体中也最高(3.39±0.12毫米)。女性的平均骨吸收为3.4±0.15毫米,男性为2.45±0.07毫米。统计学上,仅在洛 - 西伦指数上存在显著差异:35至55岁年龄组的值最高(=0.04)。
种植体植入后的时间与骨吸收程度之间以及性别之间均无统计学上的显著差异。种植体周围炎症可能在任何年龄发生,与种植体的使用时长无关。