Department of Health Education and Behavioral Sciences, Faculty of Public Health, Mahidol University, Ratchathewi, Bangkok, Thailand.
Department of Psychology, College of Medical and Health Science, Asia University, Taichung, Taiwan.
Sci Rep. 2023 Aug 3;13(1):12589. doi: 10.1038/s41598-023-39452-4.
The purpose of this study is to investigate the association between psychosocial factors, protective factors, and its associated triggers with psychological distress among Bolivian adolescents. This cross-sectional study was conducted by investigating the 2018 Bolivia global school-based student health survey (GSHS). The total number of students who participated in this survey was 7931, and the final sample was 7377. The mean age of the participants was 15.3 years (SD = 1.4). Psychological distress was assessed with a 2-item screener (loneliness and worry induced sleep disturbance). In all 22.3% of participants reported experiencing psychological distress, with 18.1% among adolescent males and 26.2% among adolescent females. In adjusted logistic regression analysis (AOR, 95% CI), there are two significant directions of association. One is the negative association, such as parental involvement as a protective factor. School adolescents who had more parental involvement were less likely to experience psychological distress. Parents understand problems or worries (0.64, 0.54-0.75, p < .001) and parents disregard privacy (0.69, 0.58-0.82, p < .001). On the other hand, many psycho-social factors are significantly positively associated with psychological distress. School adolescents who experience more psychosocial factors are more likely to experience psychological distress. Physical assault in the previous year (1.83, 1.59-2.11, p < .001), being bullied at school (1.27, 1.07-1.52, p < .01), being bullied outside of school (1.36, 1.15-1.61, p < .001), and being cyberbullied (1.60, 1.37-1.88, p < .001), were all significantly associated with psychological distress. Healthy relationships in a family, and interventions to reduce violence and bullying, should be encouraged and promoted.
本研究旨在探讨心理社会因素、保护因素及其相关触发因素与玻利维亚青少年心理困扰之间的关联。这项横断面研究通过调查 2018 年玻利维亚全球学校学生健康调查(GSHS)进行。参与这项调查的学生总数为 7931 人,最终样本为 7377 人。参与者的平均年龄为 15.3 岁(SD=1.4)。心理困扰使用 2 项筛查工具(孤独感和忧虑引起的睡眠障碍)进行评估。在所有参与者中,22.3%报告经历心理困扰,其中 18.1%为男性青少年,26.2%为女性青少年。在调整后的逻辑回归分析(AOR,95%CI)中,有两个方向具有显著关联。一个是负向关联,如父母参与是一种保护因素。与父母参与度较低的青少年相比,更多地感受到父母参与的青少年不太可能经历心理困扰。父母理解问题或担忧(0.64,0.54-0.75,p<0.001)和父母忽视隐私(0.69,0.58-0.82,p<0.001)。另一方面,许多心理社会因素与心理困扰呈显著正相关。经历更多心理社会因素的青少年更有可能经历心理困扰。前一年遭受身体攻击(1.83,1.59-2.11,p<0.001)、在学校遭受欺凌(1.27,1.07-1.52,p<0.01)、在校外遭受欺凌(1.36,1.15-1.61,p<0.001)和遭受网络欺凌(1.60,1.37-1.88,p<0.001),均与心理困扰显著相关。应鼓励和促进家庭中健康的关系,并采取干预措施减少暴力和欺凌行为。