Department of Psychosomatics and Psychiatry, ZhongDa Hospital, School of Medicine, Southeast University, Nanjing, 210009, China.
Department of Clinical Psychology, Jiangsu Province Hospital, Nanjing, 210029, China.
BMC Psychiatry. 2021 May 17;21(1):255. doi: 10.1186/s12888-021-03254-7.
Insomnia appears to be one of the most frequent sleep complaints in the general population. It has significant negative impact on daily functioning. However, there has been little research that described the effect of coping style in insomnia disorder.
The Simplified Coping Style Questionnaire (SCSQ) was used to evaluate 79 adult patients with insomnia disorder alongside 80 healthy controls. Additionally, sleep quality was assessed with the Pittsburgh Sleep Quality Index (PSQI), and Symptom Checklist-90-Revised (SCL-90R) was utilized to determine the status of depression, anxiety and other psychological symptoms.
Positive coping style score was significantly lower, whereas negative coping style score and nine symptomatic dimensions of SCL-90R were significantly higher in insomnia patients than in controls. Positive coping style score was adversely related to PSQI score, obsessive-compulsive, depression, anxiety and phobic anxiety, whereas negative coping style score was positively related to PSQI score, somatization and interpersonal sensitivity. Further multiple stepwise regression analysis showed that PSQI total score was independently and positively correlated with negative coping style score.
Insomniacs use more negative coping styles and less positive ones. Positive coping is adversely associated with insomnia symptoms and psychological distress, whereas negative coping is positively related to those symptoms. And negative coping has a negative effect on sleep quality. we should attach importance to coping styles of insomniacs in clinical practice, which may help to develop more targeted prevention and intervention strategies.
失眠似乎是普通人群中最常见的睡眠问题之一。它对日常功能有显著的负面影响。然而,对于应对方式在失眠障碍中的作用的研究甚少。
采用简易应对方式问卷(SCSQ)对 79 例失眠症患者和 80 例健康对照者进行评估。同时,采用匹兹堡睡眠质量指数(PSQI)评估睡眠质量,采用症状自评量表-90 修订版(SCL-90R)评估抑郁、焦虑和其他心理症状状况。
与对照组相比,失眠症患者的积极应对方式评分显著降低,而消极应对方式评分和 SCL-90R 的 9 个症状维度评分显著升高。积极应对方式评分与 PSQI 评分、强迫症状、抑郁、焦虑和恐怖性焦虑呈负相关,而消极应对方式评分与 PSQI 评分、躯体化和人际关系敏感呈正相关。进一步的多元逐步回归分析表明,PSQI 总分与消极应对方式评分呈独立正相关。
失眠症患者更多地使用消极应对方式,较少使用积极应对方式。积极应对与失眠症状和心理困扰呈负相关,而消极应对与这些症状呈正相关。消极应对方式对睡眠质量有负面影响。在临床实践中,我们应重视失眠症患者的应对方式,这可能有助于制定更有针对性的预防和干预策略。