• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

在评估极早产儿发育结果时使用术语参考婴儿:一项多中心研究中的经验教训。

Use of term reference infants in assessing the developmental outcome of extremely preterm infants: lessons learned in a multicenter study.

机构信息

Department of Pediatrics, McGovern Medical School at The University of Texas Health Science Center at Houston, Houston, TX, USA.

Department of Pediatrics, University of Texas Southwestern Medical Center, Dallas, TX, USA.

出版信息

J Perinatol. 2023 Nov;43(11):1398-1405. doi: 10.1038/s41372-023-01729-x. Epub 2023 Aug 4.

DOI:
10.1038/s41372-023-01729-x
PMID:37542155
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10615749/
Abstract

OBJECTIVE

Extremely preterm (EP) impairment rates are likely underestimated using the Bayley III norm-based thresholds scores and may be better assessed relative to concurrent healthy term reference (TR) infants born in the same hospital.

STUDY DESIGN

Blinded, certified examiners in the Neonatal Research Network (NRN) evaluated EP survivors and a sample of healthy TR infants recruited near the 2-year assessment age.

RESULTS

We assessed 1452 EP infants and 183 TR infants. TR-based thresholds showed higher overall EP impairment than Bayley norm-based thresholds (O.R. = 1.86; [95% CI 1.56-2.23], especially for severe impairment (36% vs. 24%; p ≤ 0.001). Difficulty recruiting TR patients at 2 years extended the study by 14 months and affected their demographics.

CONCLUSION

Impairment rates among EP infants appear to be substantially underestimated from Bayley III norms. These rates may be best assessed by comparison with healthy term infants followed with minimal attrition from birth in the same centers.

GOV ID

Term Reference (under the Generic Database Study): NCT00063063.

摘要

目的

使用贝利 III 基于标准的评分阈值,极早产儿(EP)的损伤率可能被低估,而与在同一家医院出生的同期健康足月参照(TR)婴儿相比,可能会更好地评估。

研究设计

新生儿研究网络(NRN)的经过认证的盲审员评估了 EP 幸存者和在接近 2 岁评估年龄时招募的健康 TR 婴儿的样本。

结果

我们评估了 1452 名 EP 婴儿和 183 名 TR 婴儿。基于 TR 的阈值显示,与贝利标准阈值相比,整体 EP 损伤程度更高(OR=1.86;[95%CI 1.56-2.23]),尤其是严重损伤(36% vs. 24%;p≤0.001)。在 2 岁时招募 TR 患者的困难使研究延长了 14 个月,并影响了他们的人口统计学特征。

结论

从贝利 III 标准来看,EP 婴儿的损伤率似乎被大大低估了。这些比率可能通过与在同一中心从出生开始最小流失的健康足月婴儿进行比较来最好地评估。

GOV ID

Term Reference(在 Generic Database Study 下):NCT00063063。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/47aa/10615749/73d0558cf793/41372_2023_1729_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/47aa/10615749/73d0558cf793/41372_2023_1729_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/47aa/10615749/73d0558cf793/41372_2023_1729_Fig1_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Use of term reference infants in assessing the developmental outcome of extremely preterm infants: lessons learned in a multicenter study.在评估极早产儿发育结果时使用术语参考婴儿:一项多中心研究中的经验教训。
J Perinatol. 2023 Nov;43(11):1398-1405. doi: 10.1038/s41372-023-01729-x. Epub 2023 Aug 4.
2
Effects of targeting lower versus higher arterial oxygen saturations on death or disability in preterm infants.针对较低与较高动脉血氧饱和度对早产儿死亡或残疾的影响。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2017 Apr 11;4(4):CD011190. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD011190.pub2.
3
Different corticosteroids and regimens for accelerating fetal lung maturation for babies at risk of preterm birth.不同的皮质类固醇药物和方案用于加速有早产风险的婴儿的胎儿肺成熟。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Aug 9;8(8):CD006764. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD006764.pub4.
4
Early developmental intervention programmes provided post hospital discharge to prevent motor and cognitive impairment in preterm infants.出院后提供早期发育干预计划,以预防早产儿的运动和认知障碍。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 Feb 13;2(2):CD005495. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005495.pub5.
5
Regional (spinal, epidural, caudal) versus general anaesthesia in preterm infants undergoing inguinal herniorrhaphy in early infancy.早产低龄婴儿行腹股沟疝修补术时区域麻醉(脊髓麻醉、硬膜外麻醉、骶管麻醉)与全身麻醉的比较
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jun 9;2015(6):CD003669. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003669.pub2.
6
Cup feeding versus other forms of supplemental enteral feeding for newborn infants unable to fully breastfeed.对于无法完全进行母乳喂养的新生儿,奶瓶喂养与其他形式的补充肠内喂养的比较。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2016 Aug 31;2016(8):CD005092. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD005092.pub3.
7
Repeat doses of prenatal corticosteroids for women at risk of preterm birth for improving neonatal health outcomes.重复给予有早产风险的孕妇产前皮质类固醇以改善新生儿健康结局。
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2022 Apr 4;4(4):CD003935. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD003935.pub5.
8
Sound reduction management in the neonatal intensive care unit for preterm or very low birth weight infants.早产儿或极低出生体重儿新生儿重症监护病房的降噪管理
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2015 Jan 30;1:CD010333. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010333.pub2.
9
Noise or sound management in the neonatal intensive care unit for preterm or very low birth weight infants.早产或极低出生体重儿新生儿重症监护病房的噪音或声音管理
Cochrane Database Syst Rev. 2024 May 30;5(5):CD010333. doi: 10.1002/14651858.CD010333.pub4.
10
Nutritional Management of Low Birth Weight and Preterm Infants in Low- and Low Middle-Income Countries.低收入和中低收入国家低出生体重儿和早产儿的营养管理
Neonatology. 2025;122(Suppl 1):209-223. doi: 10.1159/000542154. Epub 2024 Nov 26.

引用本文的文献

1
Neonatal neurodevelopmental follow-up in the UK: a survey of current practice and future recommendations.英国新生儿神经发育随访:当前实践与未来建议的调查
BMC Pediatr. 2025 Sep 1;25(1):674. doi: 10.1186/s12887-025-05960-7.

本文引用的文献

1
Neurodevelopmental Impairment Among Extremely Preterm Infants in the Neonatal Research Network.新生儿研究网络中的极早产儿神经发育损伤。
Pediatrics. 2018 May;141(5). doi: 10.1542/peds.2017-3091. Epub 2018 Apr 17.
2
Counterbalanced Comparison of the BSID-II and Bayley-III at Eighteen to Twenty-two Months Corrected Age.18至22个月矫正年龄时BSID-II与贝利婴幼儿发展量表第三版的平衡比较
J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2017 Jun;38(5):322-329. doi: 10.1097/DBP.0000000000000441.
3
Bayley-III Cognitive and Language Scales in Preterm Children.贝利婴幼儿发展量表 III 在早产儿中的认知和语言评估。
Pediatrics. 2015 May;135(5):e1258-65. doi: 10.1542/peds.2014-3039. Epub 2015 Apr 20.
4
Predictive validity of the Bayley, Third Edition at 2 years for intelligence quotient at 4 years in preterm infants.贝利婴幼儿发展量表第三版对早产儿2岁时的预测效度与4岁时智商的关系。
J Dev Behav Pediatr. 2014 Nov-Dec;35(9):570-5. doi: 10.1097/DBP.0000000000000110.
5
Comparison of Bayley-2 and Bayley-3 scores at 18 months in term infants following neonatal encephalopathy and therapeutic hypothermia.足月新生儿脑病行亚低温治疗后 18 个月时贝利 2 与贝利 3 评分比较。
Dev Med Child Neurol. 2013 Nov;55(11):1053-9. doi: 10.1111/dmcn.12208. Epub 2013 Aug 9.
6
General movements in very preterm children and neurodevelopment at 2 and 4 years.极早产儿的一般运动与 2 岁及 4 岁时的神经发育。
Pediatrics. 2013 Aug;132(2):e452-8. doi: 10.1542/peds.2013-0177. Epub 2013 Jul 22.
7
Neurodevelopmental outcome in extremely preterm infants at 2.5 years after active perinatal care in Sweden.瑞典积极围产期护理后极低出生体重儿 2.5 岁时的神经发育结局。
JAMA. 2013 May 1;309(17):1810-20. doi: 10.1001/jama.2013.3786.
8
Comparison of the developmental tests Bayley-III and Bayley-II in 7-month-old infants born preterm.比较 7 月龄早产儿的贝利 III 与贝利 II 发育测试。
Eur J Pediatr. 2013 Mar;172(3):393-400. doi: 10.1007/s00431-012-1902-6. Epub 2012 Dec 8.
9
Improving the Neonatal Research Network annual certification for neurologic examination of the 18-22 month child.提高新生儿研究网络对 18-22 个月儿童神经系统检查的年度认证。
J Pediatr. 2012 Dec;161(6):1041-6. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2012.05.048. Epub 2012 Jun 28.
10
Are outcomes of extremely preterm infants improving? Impact of Bayley assessment on outcomes.极早产儿的预后是否正在改善?贝利评估对预后的影响。
J Pediatr. 2012 Aug;161(2):222-8.e3. doi: 10.1016/j.jpeds.2012.01.057. Epub 2012 Mar 14.