Department of Implant Surgery, Faculty of Health Sciences, Alfonso X El Sabio University, Avda Universidad, 1. 28691, Villanueva de La Cañada, Madrid, Spain.
Department of Surgery, Faculty of Medicine and Dentistry, University of Salamanca, 37008, Salamanca, Spain.
BMC Oral Health. 2023 Aug 5;23(1):542. doi: 10.1186/s12903-023-03261-y.
To analyze and compare the accuracy and root contact prevalence, comparing a conventional freehand technique and two navigation techniques based on augmented reality technology for the orthodontic self-drilling mini-implants placement. Methods Two hundred and seven orthodontic self-drilling mini-implants were placed using either a conventional freehand technique (FHT) and two navigation techniques based on augmented reality technology (AR TOOTH and AR SCREWS). Accuracy across different dental sectors was also analyzed. CBCT and intraoral scans were taken both prior to and following orthodontic self-drilling mini-implants placement. The deviation angle and horizontal were then analyzed; these measurements were taken at the coronal entry point and apical endpoint between the planned and performed orthodontic self-drilling mini-implants. In addition, any complications resulting from mini-implant placement, such as spot perforations, were also analyzed across all dental sectors.Results The statistical analysis showed significant differences between study groups with regard to the coronal entry-point (p < 0.001), apical end-point(p < 0.001) and angular deviations (p < 0.001). Furthermore, statistically significant differences were shown between the orthodontic self-drilling mini-implants placement site at the coronal entry-point (p < 0.0001) and apical end-point (p < 0.001). Additionally, eight root perforations were observed in the FHT group, while there were no root perforations in the two navigation techniques based on augmented reality technology.Conclusions The navigation techniques based on augmented reality technology has an effect on the accuracy of orthodontic self-drilling mini-implants placement and results in fewer intraoperative complications, comparing to the conventional free-hand technique. The AR TOOTH augmented reality technique showed more accurate results between planned and placed orthodontic self-drilling mini-implants, comparing to the AR SCREWS and conventional free-hand techniques. The navigation techniques based on augmented reality technology showed fewer intraoperative complications, comparing to the conventional free-hand technique.
分析和比较传统徒手技术和两种基于增强现实技术的导航技术在正畸自攻微型植入物放置中的准确性和根接触率。方法:使用传统徒手技术(FHT)和两种基于增强现实技术的导航技术(AR TOOTH 和 AR SCREWS)放置了 207 个正畸自攻微型植入物。还分析了不同牙科领域的准确性。在放置正畸自攻微型植入物前后均拍摄 CBCT 和口内扫描。然后分析偏差角度和水平,这些测量是在计划和执行正畸自攻微型植入物的冠入口点和根尖终点之间进行的。此外,还分析了所有牙科领域中微型植入物放置引起的任何并发症,例如局部穿孔。结果:统计学分析显示,研究组之间在冠入口点(p < 0.001)、根尖终点(p < 0.001)和角度偏差(p < 0.001)方面存在显著差异。此外,在正畸自攻微型植入物的冠入口点(p < 0.0001)和根尖终点(p < 0.001)的放置部位之间也显示出统计学上的显著差异。此外,在 FHT 组中观察到 8 例根穿孔,而在两种基于增强现实技术的导航技术中没有根穿孔。结论:与传统徒手技术相比,基于增强现实技术的导航技术对正畸自攻微型植入物放置的准确性有影响,并减少了术中并发症。与 AR SCREWS 和传统徒手技术相比,AR TOOTH 增强现实技术在计划和放置正畸自攻微型植入物之间显示出更准确的结果。与传统徒手技术相比,基于增强现实技术的导航技术显示出较少的术中并发症。