Department of Medical Microbiology and Infection Prevention, Amsterdam Institute for Infection and Immunity, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
Department of Orthopaedic Surgery and Sports Medicine, Amsterdam Movement Sciences, Amsterdam UMC, University of Amsterdam, Amsterdam, The Netherlands.
J Hosp Infect. 2023 Oct;140:62-71. doi: 10.1016/j.jhin.2023.07.014. Epub 2023 Aug 6.
The origin of surgical site and biomaterial-associated infection is still elusive. Micro-organisms contaminating the wound may come from the air in the operating theatre, the surgical team or the skin of the patient. The skin of patients is disinfected prior to surgery, but bacteria deeper in the skin (e.g. in sweat glands or sebaceous glands) may not be reached.
A preliminary cohort study was performed to study the origin of surgical site and biomaterial-associated infection between May 2020 and February 2021. In order to investigate whether cutaneous microbiota colonize the wound when released from the skin upon cutting, aerobic and anaerobic bacteria were isolated, quantified and identified from the skin of 99 patients undergoing trauma surgery, before and after skin disinfection, from knife blades and from the wound directly after the first cut.
Ninety-nine percent of the patients were culture-positive before disinfection with chlorhexidine. Of these, 40% were still culture-positive after disinfection. Of these, 54% had a positive culture of the wound after cutting the skin. Twenty percent of the patients with a negative culture after disinfection had a positive wound culture after cutting the skin. Staphylococcus epidermidis and Cutibacterium acnes were the most commonly cultured bacterial species. In 9% of cases, more than 100 bacterial colonies were cultured from the wound; this may cause biomaterial-associated infection.
Bacteria residing in the skin and not eradicated by disinfection may enter the surgical wound upon cutting, resulting in contamination which may cause biomaterial-associated infection.
手术部位和生物材料相关感染的来源仍然难以捉摸。污染伤口的微生物可能来自手术室中的空气、手术团队或患者的皮肤。患者的皮肤在手术前进行消毒,但皮肤深处的细菌(例如汗腺或皮脂腺中的细菌)可能无法到达。
本研究于 2020 年 5 月至 2021 年 2 月进行了一项初步队列研究,旨在研究手术部位和生物材料相关感染的来源。为了研究当从皮肤切割时,皮肤微生物群是否会从皮肤释放到伤口中定植,从 99 名接受创伤手术的患者的皮肤、皮肤消毒前后的手术刀以及第一次切割后的伤口中分离、定量和鉴定需氧菌和厌氧菌。
99%的患者在使用洗必泰消毒前进行培养时呈阳性。其中,40%在消毒后仍呈阳性。其中,54%的患者在切割皮肤后伤口呈阳性培养。20%的消毒后培养阴性的患者在切割皮肤后伤口呈阳性培养。表皮葡萄球菌和痤疮丙酸杆菌是最常培养的细菌种类。在 9%的情况下,从伤口中培养出超过 100 个细菌菌落;这可能导致生物材料相关感染。
皮肤中存在且消毒无法消除的细菌在切割时可能进入手术伤口,导致污染,从而可能导致生物材料相关感染。