• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利：CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法，用中文像聊天一样搜索，搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐，让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版，准确专业，支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式，支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述，25分钟生成高质量综述，智能提取关键信息，辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

马来西亚样本中的冲动性、与赌博相关的认知、认知重评与赌博行为。

Impulsivity, Gambling-Related Cognitions, Cognitive Reappraisal and Gambling Behaviour in a Malaysian Sample.

机构信息

Department of Psychology, Jeffrey Cheah School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Monash University Malaysia, Jalan Lagoon Selatan, Bandar Sunway, Subang Jaya, Selangor, 47500, Malaysia.

出版信息

J Gambl Stud. 2024 Jun;40(2):475-492. doi: 10.1007/s10899-023-10246-7. Epub 2023 Aug 7.

DOI:10.1007/s10899-023-10246-7
PMID:37544960
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC11272694/
Abstract

The relationships between cognitive reappraisal and problem gambling have been widely studied in different contexts. However, previous research findings remain inconsistent. This discrepancy might be attributed to the effects of interactions between cognitive reappraisal and other risk factors for problem gambling. Using moderation models, this study examined the association between impulsivity, gambling-related cognitive distortions, cognitive reappraisal and problem gambling in a sample of Malaysian gamblers. A total of 149 community gamblers (103 males, 46 females; mean age = 32.18) completed an online questionnaire. Problem gambling was measured with the South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS); cognitive reappraisal was measured using the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire-Cognitive Reappraisal Subscale (ERQ-CR); impulsivity was measured with the Short-UPPS-P Impulsive Behaviour Scale (SUPPS-P); and gambling-related cognitive distortions were measured using the Gambling Related Cognitions Scale (GRCS). The results revealed impulsivity and gambling-related cognitive distortions as significant predictors of problem gambling. At high levels, impulsivity and cognitive distortions are significant moderator variables that strengthen the association between cognitive reappraisal and problem gambling. These findings demonstrate that reappraisal skills could exacerbate problem gambling severity amongst impulsive or self-deceptive gamblers. Future research with larger and more representative samples is needed to validate and generalise these findings.

摘要

在不同背景下，认知重评与赌博问题之间的关系已得到广泛研究。然而，先前的研究结果仍不一致。这种差异可能归因于认知重评与赌博问题的其他风险因素之间相互作用的影响。本研究使用调节模型，在马来西亚赌徒样本中检验了冲动性、与赌博相关的认知扭曲、认知重评与赌博问题之间的关系。共有 149 名社区赌徒（103 名男性，46 名女性；平均年龄=32.18）完成了在线问卷。赌博问题使用 South Oaks Gambling Screen（SOGS）进行测量；认知重评使用情绪调节问卷-认知重评分量表（ERQ-CR）进行测量；冲动性使用短期 UPPS-P 冲动行为量表（SUPPS-P）进行测量；与赌博相关的认知扭曲使用赌博相关认知量表（GRCS）进行测量。结果表明，冲动性和与赌博相关的认知扭曲是赌博问题的重要预测因素。在高水平上，冲动性和认知扭曲是认知重评与赌博问题之间关联的重要调节变量，会增强这种关联。这些发现表明，在冲动或自我欺骗的赌徒中，重评技巧可能会加剧赌博问题的严重程度。需要进行具有更大和更具代表性样本的未来研究，以验证和推广这些发现。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9704/11272694/a5372b852388/10899_2023_10246_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9704/11272694/eb7f045c7aef/10899_2023_10246_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9704/11272694/a5372b852388/10899_2023_10246_Fig2_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9704/11272694/eb7f045c7aef/10899_2023_10246_Fig1_HTML.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/9704/11272694/a5372b852388/10899_2023_10246_Fig2_HTML.jpg

相似文献

1
Impulsivity, Gambling-Related Cognitions, Cognitive Reappraisal and Gambling Behaviour in a Malaysian Sample.马来西亚样本中的冲动性、与赌博相关的认知、认知重评与赌博行为。
J Gambl Stud. 2024 Jun;40(2):475-492. doi: 10.1007/s10899-023-10246-7. Epub 2023 Aug 7.
2
Types of Emotion Regulation and Their Associations with Gambling: A Cross-Sectional Study with Disordered and Non-problem Ecuadorian Gamblers.情绪调节类型及其与赌博的关系：一项横断面研究，涉及有问题和无问题的厄瓜多尔赌徒。
J Gambl Stud. 2019 Sep;35(3):997-1013. doi: 10.1007/s10899-019-09868-7.
3
The role of affect-driven impulsivity in gambling cognitions: A convenience-sample study with a Spanish version of the Gambling-Related Cognitions Scale.情感驱动的冲动性在赌博认知中的作用：一项使用西班牙语版赌博相关认知量表的便利样本研究。
J Behav Addict. 2017 Mar 1;6(1):51-63. doi: 10.1556/2006.6.2017.001. Epub 2017 Jan 25.
4
Impulsivity and cognitive distortions in pathological gamblers attending the UK National Problem Gambling Clinic: a preliminary report.参加英国国家问题赌博诊所的病态赌徒的冲动和认知扭曲：初步报告。
Psychol Med. 2011 Dec;41(12):2625-35. doi: 10.1017/S003329171100095X. Epub 2011 Jun 29.
5
Wagering the future: Cognitive distortions, impulsivity, delay discounting, and time perspective in adolescent gambling.押注未来：青少年赌博中的认知扭曲、冲动性、延迟折扣和时间观念
J Adolesc. 2015 Dec;45:56-66. doi: 10.1016/j.adolescence.2015.08.015. Epub 2015 Sep 10.
6
The joint role of impulsivity and distorted cognitions in recreational and problem gambling: A cluster analytic approach.冲动性和认知扭曲在娱乐性和问题赌博中的共同作用：一种聚类分析方法。
J Affect Disord. 2020 Jan 1;260:473-482. doi: 10.1016/j.jad.2019.08.096. Epub 2019 Sep 2.
7
The paradoxical relationship between emotion regulation and gambling-related cognitive biases.情绪调节与赌博相关认知偏差之间的矛盾关系。
PLoS One. 2019 Aug 5;14(8):e0220668. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220668. eCollection 2019.
8
Impulsivity and cognitive distortions in different clinical phenotypes of gambling disorder: Profiles and longitudinal prediction of treatment outcomes.冲动性和认知扭曲在不同临床表型的赌博障碍中的表现：治疗结果的特征和纵向预测。
Eur Psychiatry. 2019 Sep;61:9-16. doi: 10.1016/j.eurpsy.2019.06.006. Epub 2019 Jun 28.
9
Pathological personality facets and emotion (dys)regulation in gambling disorder.病理性人格特质与赌博障碍中的情绪（失调）调节。
Scand J Psychol. 2020 Apr;61(2):262-270. doi: 10.1111/sjop.12579. Epub 2019 Oct 17.
10
Mentalizing Failures, Emotional Dysregulation, and Cognitive Distortions Among Adolescent Problem Gamblers.青少年问题赌徒的心理化失败、情绪失调和认知扭曲
J Gambl Stud. 2021 Mar;37(1):283-298. doi: 10.1007/s10899-020-09967-w.

引用本文的文献

1
No evidence for the role of intentional emotion regulation in gambling-related problems: Insights from self-report, behavioral, and heart rate variability measures.无证据表明有意情绪调节在赌博相关问题中起作用：来自自我报告、行为及心率变异性测量的见解。
J Behav Addict. 2025 Feb 18;14(1):501-521. doi: 10.1556/2006.2025.00010. Print 2025 Mar 28.
2
The risk of believing that emotions are bad and uncontrollable: association with orthorexia nervosa.认为情绪有害且无法控制的风险：与神经性正食症的关联。
Eat Weight Disord. 2025 Jan 18;30(1):8. doi: 10.1007/s40519-024-01710-3.

本文引用的文献

1
Problem Gambling 'Fuelled on the Fly'.赌瘾“乘飞机更易发作”。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2021 Aug 14;18(16):8607. doi: 10.3390/ijerph18168607.
2
Gambling in Malaysia: an overview.马来西亚的赌博：概述
BJPsych Int. 2021 May;18(2):32-34. doi: 10.1192/bji.2020.55.
3
Association between gambling disorder and emotion (dys)regulation: A systematic review and meta-analysis.赌博障碍与情绪（失调）调节之间的关联：一项系统综述与荟萃分析。
Clin Psychol Rev. 2021 Jul;87:102037. doi: 10.1016/j.cpr.2021.102037. Epub 2021 May 8.
4
A Comparison of Gambling-Related Cognitions and Behaviors in Gamblers from the United States and Spain.中美两国赌徒的赌博相关认知和行为比较。
J Gambl Stud. 2021 Mar;37(1):319-333. doi: 10.1007/s10899-020-09971-0.
5
The paradoxical relationship between emotion regulation and gambling-related cognitive biases.情绪调节与赌博相关认知偏差之间的矛盾关系。
PLoS One. 2019 Aug 5;14(8):e0220668. doi: 10.1371/journal.pone.0220668. eCollection 2019.
6
Types of Emotion Regulation and Their Associations with Gambling: A Cross-Sectional Study with Disordered and Non-problem Ecuadorian Gamblers.情绪调节类型及其与赌博的关系：一项横断面研究，涉及有问题和无问题的厄瓜多尔赌徒。
J Gambl Stud. 2019 Sep;35(3):997-1013. doi: 10.1007/s10899-019-09868-7.
7
A Multivariate Evaluation of 25 Proximal and Distal Risk-Factors for Gambling-Related Harm.对25个与赌博相关危害的近端和远端风险因素的多变量评估。
J Clin Med. 2019 Apr 13;8(4):509. doi: 10.3390/jcm8040509.
8
The Psychometric Properties of a Short UPPS-P Impulsive Behavior Scale Among Psychiatric Patients Evaluated in an Emergency Setting.在急诊环境中评估的精神科患者中，简短UPPS-P冲动行为量表的心理测量特性。
Front Psychiatry. 2019 Mar 25;10:139. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2019.00139. eCollection 2019.
9
Flexible Emotion Regulation: How Situational Demands and Individual Differences Influence the Effectiveness of Regulatory Strategies.灵活的情绪调节：情境需求和个体差异如何影响调节策略的有效性。
Front Psychol. 2019 Feb 1;10:72. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2019.00072. eCollection 2019.
10
Conceptualizing gambling disorder with the process model of emotion regulation.用情绪调节的过程模型来概念化赌博障碍。
J Behav Addict. 2018 Jun 1;7(2):239-251. doi: 10.1556/2006.7.2018.52. Epub 2018 Jun 25.