Department of Psychology, Jeffrey Cheah School of Medicine and Health Sciences, Monash University Malaysia, Jalan Lagoon Selatan, Bandar Sunway, Subang Jaya, Selangor, 47500, Malaysia.
J Gambl Stud. 2024 Jun;40(2):475-492. doi: 10.1007/s10899-023-10246-7. Epub 2023 Aug 7.
The relationships between cognitive reappraisal and problem gambling have been widely studied in different contexts. However, previous research findings remain inconsistent. This discrepancy might be attributed to the effects of interactions between cognitive reappraisal and other risk factors for problem gambling. Using moderation models, this study examined the association between impulsivity, gambling-related cognitive distortions, cognitive reappraisal and problem gambling in a sample of Malaysian gamblers. A total of 149 community gamblers (103 males, 46 females; mean age = 32.18) completed an online questionnaire. Problem gambling was measured with the South Oaks Gambling Screen (SOGS); cognitive reappraisal was measured using the Emotion Regulation Questionnaire-Cognitive Reappraisal Subscale (ERQ-CR); impulsivity was measured with the Short-UPPS-P Impulsive Behaviour Scale (SUPPS-P); and gambling-related cognitive distortions were measured using the Gambling Related Cognitions Scale (GRCS). The results revealed impulsivity and gambling-related cognitive distortions as significant predictors of problem gambling. At high levels, impulsivity and cognitive distortions are significant moderator variables that strengthen the association between cognitive reappraisal and problem gambling. These findings demonstrate that reappraisal skills could exacerbate problem gambling severity amongst impulsive or self-deceptive gamblers. Future research with larger and more representative samples is needed to validate and generalise these findings.
在不同背景下,认知重评与赌博问题之间的关系已得到广泛研究。然而,先前的研究结果仍不一致。这种差异可能归因于认知重评与赌博问题的其他风险因素之间相互作用的影响。本研究使用调节模型,在马来西亚赌徒样本中检验了冲动性、与赌博相关的认知扭曲、认知重评与赌博问题之间的关系。共有 149 名社区赌徒(103 名男性,46 名女性;平均年龄=32.18)完成了在线问卷。赌博问题使用 South Oaks Gambling Screen(SOGS)进行测量;认知重评使用情绪调节问卷-认知重评分量表(ERQ-CR)进行测量;冲动性使用短期 UPPS-P 冲动行为量表(SUPPS-P)进行测量;与赌博相关的认知扭曲使用赌博相关认知量表(GRCS)进行测量。结果表明,冲动性和与赌博相关的认知扭曲是赌博问题的重要预测因素。在高水平上,冲动性和认知扭曲是认知重评与赌博问题之间关联的重要调节变量,会增强这种关联。这些发现表明,在冲动或自我欺骗的赌徒中,重评技巧可能会加剧赌博问题的严重程度。需要进行具有更大和更具代表性样本的未来研究,以验证和推广这些发现。