Del Prete Francesco, Steward Trevor, Navas Juan F, Fernández-Aranda Fernando, Jiménez-Murcia Susana, Oei Tian P S, Perales José C
1 Mind, Brain and Behavior Research Center, University of Granada , Granada, Spain.
3 Centre for Economic and International Studies, University of Rome "Tor Vergata" , Rome, Italy.
J Behav Addict. 2017 Mar 1;6(1):51-63. doi: 10.1556/2006.6.2017.001. Epub 2017 Jan 25.
Background and aims Abnormal cognitions are among the most salient domain-specific features of gambling disorder. The aims of this study were: (a) to examine and validate a Spanish version of the Gambling-Related Cognitions Scale (GRCS; Raylu & Oei, 2004) and (b) to examine associations between cognitive distortion levels, impulsivity, and gambling behavior. Methods This study first recruited a convenience sample of 500 adults who had gambled during the previous year. Participants were assessed using the Spanish version of GRCS (GRCS-S) questionnaire, the UPPS-P impulsivity questionnaire, measures of gambling behavior, and potentially relevant confounders. Robust confirmatory factor analysis methods on half the sample were used to select the best models from a hypothesis-driven set. The best solutions were validated on the other half, and the resulting factors were later correlated with impulsivity dimensions (in the whole n = 500 factor analysis sample) and clinically relevant gambling indices (in a separate convenience sample of 137 disordered and non-disordered gamblers; validity sample). Results This study supports the original five-factor model, suggests an alternative four-factor solution, and confirms the psychometric soundness of the GRCS-S. Importantly, cognitive distortions consistently correlated with affect- or motivation-driven aspects of impulsivity (urgency and sensation seeking), but not with cognitive impulsivity (lack of premeditation and lack of perseverance). Discussion and conclusions Our findings suggest that the GRCS-S is a valid and reliable instrument to identify gambling cognitions in Spanish samples. Our results expand upon previous research signaling specific associations between gambling-related distortions and affect-driven impulsivity in line with models of motivated reasoning.
背景与目的 异常认知是赌博障碍最显著的特定领域特征之一。本研究的目的是:(a) 检验并验证《赌博相关认知量表》(GRCS;Raylu & Oei,2004)的西班牙语版本,以及 (b) 检验认知扭曲水平、冲动性与赌博行为之间的关联。方法 本研究首先招募了一个由500名去年有过赌博行为的成年人组成的便利样本。使用GRCS西班牙语版问卷(GRCS-S)、UPPS-P冲动性问卷、赌博行为测量工具以及潜在相关混杂因素对参与者进行评估。对一半样本使用稳健的验证性因素分析方法,从一组假设驱动的模型中选择最佳模型。在另一半样本上对最佳解决方案进行验证,随后将所得因素与冲动性维度(在整个n = 500的因素分析样本中)以及临床相关赌博指标(在一个由有赌博障碍和无赌博障碍的137名赌徒组成的单独便利样本中;效度样本)进行关联分析。结果 本研究支持原始的五因素模型,提出了一个替代的四因素解决方案,并证实了GRCS-S的心理测量学稳健性。重要的是,认知扭曲始终与冲动性的情感或动机驱动方面(紧迫感和寻求刺激)相关,但与认知冲动性(缺乏预谋和缺乏毅力)无关。讨论与结论 我们的研究结果表明,GRCS-S是一种有效且可靠的工具,可用于识别西班牙样本中的赌博认知。我们的结果扩展了先前的研究,表明赌博相关扭曲与情感驱动的冲动性之间存在特定关联,这与动机性推理模型一致。