Aibekova L, Keller R A, Katzke J, Allman D M, Hita-Garcia F, Labonte D, Narendra A, Economo E P
Biodiversity and Biocomplexity Unit, Okinawa Institute of Science and Technology Graduate University, 1919-1 Tancha, Onna-son, Okinawa 904-0495, Japan.
Museu Nacional de Historia Natural e da Ciência & Centre for Ecology, Evolution and Environmental Changes & CHANGE - Global Change and Sustainability Institute, Universidade de Lisboa, Lisbon, Portugal.
Integr Org Biol. 2023 Jul 25;5(1):obad026. doi: 10.1093/iob/obad026. eCollection 2023.
Jumping is a rapid locomotory mode widespread in terrestrial organisms. However, it is a rare specialization in ants. Forward jumping has been reported within four distantly related ant genera: , and . The temporal engagement of legs/body parts during jump, however, varies across these genera. It is unknown what morphological adaptations underlie such behaviors and whether jumping in ants is solely driven directly by muscle contraction or additionally relies on elastic recoil mechanism. We investigated the morphological adaptations for jumping behavior by comparing differences in the locomotory musculature between jumping and non-jumping relatives using X-ray micro-CT and 3D morphometrics. We found that the size-specific volumes of the trochanter depressor muscle () of the middle and hind legs are 3-5 times larger in jumping ants, and that one coxal remotor muscle () is reduced in volume in the middle and/or hind legs. Notably, the enlargement in the volume of other muscle groups is directly linked to the legs or body parts engaged during the jump. Furthermore, a direct comparison of the muscle architecture revealed two significant differences between jumping vs. non-jumping ants: First, the relative Physiological Cross-Sectional Area (PCSA) of the trochanter depressor muscles of all three legs were larger in jumping ants, except in the front legs of and ; second, the relative muscle fiber length was shorter in jumping ants compared to non-jumping counterparts, except in the front legs of and . These results suggest that the difference in relative muscle volume in jumping ants is largely invested in the area (PCSA), and not in fiber length. There was no clear difference in the pennation angle between jumping and non-jumping ants. Additionally, we report that the hind leg length relative to body length was longer in jumping ants. Based on direct comparison of the observed vs. possible work and power output during jumps, we surmise that direct muscle contractions suffice to explain jumping performance in three species, except for , where the lack of data on jumping performance prevents us from drawing definitive conclusions for this particular species. We suggest that increased investment in jumping-relevant musculature is a primary morphological adaptation that separates jumping from non-jumping ants. These results elucidate the common and idiosyncratic morphological changes underlying this rare adaptation in ants. まとぅみ (Okinawan language-Uchinaaguchi) (Japanese) РЕЗЮМЕ (Kazakh) ZUSAMMENFASSUNG (German).
跳跃是一种在陆生生物中广泛存在的快速运动方式。然而,它在蚂蚁中是一种罕见的特殊行为。在四个亲缘关系较远的蚂蚁属( 、 和 )中都有向前跳跃的报道。然而,这些属在跳跃过程中腿部/身体部位的时间参与情况各不相同。目前尚不清楚这种行为背后的形态学适应机制是什么,以及蚂蚁的跳跃是否仅由肌肉收缩直接驱动,还是额外依赖弹性反冲机制。我们通过使用X射线显微CT和三维形态测量学比较跳跃蚂蚁和非跳跃蚂蚁亲属之间运动肌肉组织的差异,研究了跳跃行为的形态学适应。我们发现,跳跃蚂蚁中后腿和中腿的转节下压肌( )的特定大小体积比非跳跃蚂蚁大3至5倍,并且中腿和/或后腿中的一块髋部牵肌( )体积减小。值得注意的是,其他肌肉群体积的增大与跳跃过程中参与的腿部或身体部位直接相关。此外,对肌肉结构的直接比较揭示了跳跃蚂蚁和非跳跃蚂蚁之间的两个显著差异:第一,除了 在 和 的前腿中,跳跃蚂蚁所有三条腿的转节下压肌的相对生理横截面积(PCSA)都更大;第二,与非跳跃蚂蚁相比,跳跃蚂蚁的相对肌纤维长度更短,除了 在 和 的前腿中。这些结果表明,跳跃蚂蚁相对肌肉体积的差异主要体现在面积(PCSA)上,而不是纤维长度上。跳跃蚂蚁和非跳跃蚂蚁之间的羽角没有明显差异。此外,我们报告跳跃蚂蚁的后腿长度相对于身体长度更长。基于对跳跃过程中观察到的与可能的功和功率输出的直接比较,我们推测直接肌肉收缩足以解释三个物种的跳跃表现,除了 ,由于缺乏该物种跳跃表现的数据,我们无法对其得出明确结论。我们认为,增加对与跳跃相关肌肉组织的投入是将跳跃蚂蚁与非跳跃蚂蚁区分开来的主要形态学适应。这些结果阐明了蚂蚁这种罕见适应背后的共同和独特的形态学变化。 总结(冲绳语-冲绳方言)(日语) 摘要(哈萨克语) 总结(德语)