Hong Joanna H, Nakamura Julia S, Berkman Lisa F, Chen Frances S, Shiba Koichiro, Chen Ying, Kim Eric S, VanderWeele Tyler J
Department of Psychology, University of British Columbia, Vancouver, BC, Canada.
Harvard Center for Population and Development Studies, Harvard T.H. Chan School of Public Health, Boston, MA, USA.
SSM Popul Health. 2023 Jul 1;23:101459. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2023.101459. eCollection 2023 Sep.
The detrimental effects of loneliness and social isolation on health and well-being outcomes are well documented. In response, governments, corporations, and community-based organizations have begun leveraging tools to create interventions and policies aimed at reducing loneliness and social isolation at scale. However, these efforts are frequently hampered by a key knowledge gap: when attempting to improve specific health and well-being outcomes, decision-makers are often unsure whether to target loneliness, social isolation, or both. Filling this knowledge gap will inform the development and refinement of effective interventions. Using data from the Health and Retirement Study (13,752 participants (59% women and 41% men, mean [SD] age = 67 [10] years)), we examined how changes in loneliness and social isolation over a 4-year follow-up period (from t0:2008/2010 to t1:2012/2014) were associated with 32 indicators of physical-, behavioral-, and psychosocial-health outcomes 4-years later (t2:2016/2018). We used multiple logistic-, linear-, and generalized-linear regression models, and adjusted for sociodemographic, personality traits, pre-baseline levels of both exposures (loneliness and social isolation), and all outcomes (t0:2008/2010). We incorporated data from all participants into the overall estimate, regardless of whether their levels of loneliness and social isolation changed from the pre-baseline to baseline waves. After adjusting for a wide range of covariates, we observed that both loneliness and social isolation were associated with several physical health outcomes and health behaviors. However, social isolation was more predictive of mortality risk and loneliness was a stronger predictor of psychological outcomes. Loneliness and social isolation have independent effects on various health and well-being outcomes and thus constitute distinct targets for interventions aimed at improving population health and well-being.
孤独和社会隔离对健康及幸福状况的有害影响已有充分记录。作为回应,政府、企业和社区组织已开始利用各种工具来制定干预措施和政策,旨在大规模减少孤独和社会隔离现象。然而,这些努力常常受到一个关键知识缺口的阻碍:在试图改善特定的健康和幸福状况时,决策者往往不确定是应针对孤独、社会隔离,还是两者都要。填补这一知识缺口将为有效干预措施的制定和完善提供依据。利用健康与退休研究(13752名参与者,其中59%为女性,41%为男性,平均[标准差]年龄 = 67[10]岁)的数据,我们研究了在4年随访期(从t0:2008/2010到t1:2012/2014)内孤独感和社会隔离的变化与4年后(t2:2016/2018)32项身体、行为和心理社会健康状况指标之间的关联。我们使用了多个逻辑回归、线性回归和广义线性回归模型,并对社会人口统计学、人格特质、两种暴露因素(孤独感和社会隔离)的基线前水平以及所有结局(t0:2008/2010)进行了调整。我们将所有参与者的数据纳入总体估计中,无论他们的孤独感和社会隔离水平从基线前到基线阶段是否发生了变化。在对一系列协变量进行调整后,我们观察到孤独感和社会隔离均与多种身体健康状况和健康行为相关。然而,社会隔离对死亡风险的预测性更强,而孤独感对心理结局的预测性更强。孤独感和社会隔离对各种健康和幸福状况有独立影响,因此构成了旨在改善人群健康和幸福状况的不同干预目标。