DISTUM, Department of Humanities, University of Urbino Carlo Bo, Urbino, Italy.
Psychology Department, University of Milano-Bicocca, Milan, Italy.
Ann Dyslexia. 2023 Oct;73(3):356-392. doi: 10.1007/s11881-023-00287-3. Epub 2023 Aug 7.
In this study, we validated the "ReadFree tool", a computerised battery of 12 visual and auditory tasks developed to identify poor readers also in minority-language children (MLC). We tested the task-specific discriminant power on 142 Italian-monolingual participants (8-13 years old) divided into monolingual poor readers (N = 37) and good readers (N = 105) according to standardised Italian reading tests. The performances at the discriminant tasks of the "ReadFree tool" were entered into a classification and regression tree (CART) model to identify monolingual poor and good readers. The set of classification rules extracted from the CART model were applied to the MLC's performance and the ensuing classification was compared to the one based on standardised Italian reading tests. According to the CART model, auditory go-no/go (regular), RAN and Entrainment were the most discriminant tasks. When compared with the clinical classification, the CART model accuracy was 86% for the monolinguals and 76% for the MLC. Executive functions and timing skills turned out to have a relevant role in reading. Results of the CART model on MLC support the idea that ad hoc standardised tasks that go beyond reading are needed.
在这项研究中,我们验证了“ReadFree 工具”,这是一种计算机化的 12 项视觉和听觉任务组合,旨在识别也在少数民族语言儿童(MLC)中阅读能力较差的儿童。我们根据标准化的意大利阅读测试,对 142 名意大利语单语参与者(8-13 岁)进行了测试,将他们分为单语阅读困难者(N=37)和阅读良好者(N=105),以检验任务特异性的判别能力。将“ReadFree 工具”的判别任务表现输入分类回归树(CART)模型,以识别单语阅读困难者和阅读良好者。从 CART 模型中提取的分类规则集应用于 MLC 的表现,由此得出的分类结果与基于标准化意大利阅读测试的分类结果进行比较。根据 CART 模型,听觉 go-no/go(规则)、RAN 和节拍器是最具判别力的任务。与临床分类相比,CART 模型对单语者的准确率为 86%,对 MLC 的准确率为 76%。执行功能和定时技能在阅读中起着重要作用。CART 模型对 MLC 的结果支持了这样一种观点,即需要超越阅读的特定标准化任务。