Institute of Reproductive and Child Health, National Health Commission Key Laboratory of Reproductive Health and Department of Epidemiology and Biostatistics, Ministry of Education Key Laboratory of Epidemiology of Major Diseases (PKU), School of Public Health, Peking University Health Science Center, Beijing, China.
Department of Epidemiology and Environmental Health, School of Public Health and Health Professions, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14214, United States; Research and Education in Energy, Environment and Water Institute, University at Buffalo, Buffalo, NY 14214, United States; Department of Environmental and Occupational Health Sciences, University of Washington, Seattle, WA 98115, United States.
Sci Total Environ. 2023 Dec 1;902:166088. doi: 10.1016/j.scitotenv.2023.166088. Epub 2023 Aug 6.
Pregnancy loss, a major health issue that affects human sustainability, has been linked to short-term exposure to ground-surface ozone (O). However, the association is inconsistent, possibly because of the co-occurrence of O and heat episodes, as increased temperature is a risk factor for pregnancy loss. To explain this inconsistency, the effect of O on pregnancy loss needs to be examined jointly with that of high temperature.
A total of 247,305 pregnancy losses during the warm season were extracted from fetal death certificates from the 386 counties in contiguous United States from 1989 to 2005. We assessed environmental exposure based on the daily maximum 8 h average of O from Air Quality System monitors and the 24 h average temperature from the North American Regional Reanalysis product. We conducted a bidirectional, time-stratified case-crossover study of the association between pregnancy loss and exposures to O and temperature and their multiplicative interaction. The main time window for the exposure assessment was the day of case occurrence and the preceding 3 days. To estimate the association, we used conditional logistic regression with adjustment for relative humidity, height of the planetary boundary layer, and holidays. Sensitivity analyses were performed on the lagged structure, nonlinearity, and between-subpopulation heterogeneity of the estimated joint effect.
The joint effect was first estimated by the regression against categorical exposure by tertile. Compared to the low-low exposure group (O ≤ 78 μg/m and temperature ≤ 18 °C), the odds of pregnancy loss was significantly higher by 6.0 % (95 % confidence interval [CI] 2.4-9.7 %), 9.8 % (6.1-13.8 %), and 7.5 % (4.7-10.3 %) in the high-low (>104 μg/m and ≤18 °C), low-high (≤78 μg/m and >23 °C), and high-high (>104 μg/m and >23 °C) groups. The model of linear exposure and the multiplicative interaction yielded similar results. Each increment of 10 μg/m in O and 1 °C in temperature was associated with a 3.0 % (2.0 %-4.0 %) and 3.9 % (3.5 %-4.3 %), respectively, increase in the odds of pregnancy loss. A decrease in odds of 0.2 % (0.1 %-0.2 %) was associated with the temperature × O interaction. The finding of an antagonistic interaction between temperature and O was confirmed by models parametrizing the joint exposure as alternative nonlinear terms (i.e., a two-dimensional spline term or a varying-coefficient term) and was robust to a variety of exposure lags and stratifications. Therefore, the marginal effect of O was estimated to vary by climate zone. A significant association between O and pregnancy loss was observed in the northern, but not southern, United States.
Joint exposure to O and high temperature can increase the risk for pregnancy loss. The adverse effect of O is potentially modified by ambient temperature. In high-latitude cities, controlling for O pollution could protect maternal health.
妊娠丢失是影响人类可持续性的重大健康问题,与短期接触地面臭氧(O)有关。然而,这种关联并不一致,这可能是因为 O 和高温事件同时发生,因为温度升高是妊娠丢失的一个风险因素。为了解释这种不一致性,需要联合检查 O 对妊娠丢失的影响和高温的影响。
从 1989 年至 2005 年美国连续 386 个县的胎儿死亡证明中提取了 247305 例妊娠丢失。我们根据空气质量系统监测器的每日最大 8 小时平均 O 和北美区域再分析产品的 24 小时平均温度来评估环境暴露情况。我们对 O 和温度暴露及其相互作用的妊娠丢失进行了双向、时间分层病例交叉研究。暴露评估的主要时间窗口是病例发生日及前 3 天。为了估计关联,我们使用条件逻辑回归模型,对相对湿度、行星边界层高度和节假日进行了调整。对估计联合效应的滞后结构、非线性和亚群异质性进行了敏感性分析。
首先通过三分类暴露的回归来估计联合效应。与低低暴露组(O≤78μg/m3且温度≤18°C)相比,O 高高暴露组(O>104μg/m3且温度>23°C)、高低暴露组(O>104μg/m3且温度≤18°C)和低高暴露组(O≤78μg/m3且温度>23°C)的妊娠丢失风险分别显著增加 6.0%(95%置信区间[CI]2.4-9.7%)、9.8%(6.1-13.8%)和 7.5%(4.7-10.3%)。线性暴露模型和乘法交互作用模型得出了相似的结果。O 每增加 10μg/m3,温度每升高 1°C,妊娠丢失的风险分别增加 3.0%(2.0%-4.0%)和 3.9%(3.5%-4.3%)。温度-O 交互作用与妊娠丢失风险降低 0.2%(0.1%-0.2%)相关。通过将联合暴露参数化为替代非线性项(即二维样条项或变系数项)来确认温度和 O 之间存在拮抗相互作用的模型,并且该结果在各种暴露滞后和分层中都是稳健的。因此,O 的边际效应估计因气候带而异。在美国北部观察到 O 与妊娠丢失之间存在显著关联,但在美国南部则没有。
O 和高温的联合暴露可能会增加妊娠丢失的风险。O 的不良影响可能受环境温度的影响。在高纬度城市,控制 O 污染可以保护母婴健康。