School of Nursing, University of Ottawa, Ottawa, Canada.
Clinical Epidemiology Program, Ottawa Hospital Research Institute, Ottawa, Canada.
Health Res Policy Syst. 2023 Aug 7;21(1):81. doi: 10.1186/s12961-023-01028-z.
There is growing evidence that context mediates the effects of implementation interventions intended to increase healthcare professionals' use of research evidence in clinical practice. However, conceptual clarity about what comprises context is elusive. The purpose of this study was to advance conceptual clarity on context by developing the Implementation in Context Framework, a meta-framework of the context domains, attributes and features that can facilitate or hinder healthcare professionals' use of research evidence and the effectiveness of implementation interventions in clinical practice.
We conducted a meta-synthesis of data from three interrelated studies: (1) a concept analysis of published literature on context (n = 70 studies), (2) a secondary analysis of healthcare professional interviews (n = 145) examining context across 11 unique studies and (3) a descriptive qualitative study comprised of interviews with heath system stakeholders (n = 39) in four countries to elicit their tacit knowledge on the attributes and features of context. A rigorous protocol was followed for the meta-synthesis, resulting in development of the Implementation in Context Framework. Following this meta-synthesis, the framework was further refined through feedback from experts in context and implementation science.
In the Implementation in Context Framework, context is conceptualized in three levels: micro (individual), meso (organizational), and macro (external). The three levels are composed of six contextual domains: (1) actors (micro), (2) organizational climate and structures (meso), (3) organizational social behaviour (meso), (4) organizational response to change (meso), (5) organizational processes (meso) and (6) external influences (macro). These six domains contain 22 core attributes of context and 108 features that illustrate these attributes.
The Implementation in Context Framework is the only meta-framework of context available to guide implementation efforts of healthcare professionals. It provides a comprehensive and critically needed understanding of the context domains, attributes and features relevant to healthcare professionals' use of research evidence in clinical practice. The Implementation in Context Framework can inform implementation intervention design and delivery to better interpret the effects of implementation interventions, and pragmatically guide implementation efforts that enhance evidence uptake and sustainability by healthcare professionals.
越来越多的证据表明,语境可以调节旨在提高医疗保健专业人员在临床实践中使用研究证据的实施干预措施的效果。然而,对于构成语境的内容,概念上并不明确。本研究的目的是通过开发实施背景框架来提高对语境的概念理解,该框架是一个元框架,包括影响医疗保健专业人员在临床实践中使用研究证据和实施干预措施效果的背景领域、属性和特征。
我们对来自三项相互关联的研究的数据进行了元综合:(1)对已发表文献中关于语境的概念分析(n=70 项研究),(2)对 11 项独特研究中涉及语境的医疗保健专业人员访谈的二次分析(n=145),(3)在四个国家进行的包括卫生系统利益相关者访谈的描述性定性研究(n=39),以了解他们对语境属性和特征的隐性知识。元综合遵循严格的方案,由此产生了实施背景框架。在这项元综合之后,通过来自语境和实施科学领域的专家的反馈,进一步完善了该框架。
在实施背景框架中,语境在三个层面上进行概念化:微观(个体)、中观(组织)和宏观(外部)。这三个层面由六个语境领域组成:(1)参与者(微观),(2)组织氛围和结构(中观),(3)组织社会行为(中观),(4)组织对变化的反应(中观),(5)组织过程(中观)和(6)外部影响(宏观)。这六个领域包含 22 个核心语境属性和 108 个说明这些属性的特征。
实施背景框架是唯一可用的指导医疗保健专业人员实施工作的语境元框架。它提供了对与医疗保健专业人员在临床实践中使用研究证据相关的背景领域、属性和特征的全面而迫切需要的理解。实施背景框架可以为实施干预措施的设计和提供信息,以更好地解释实施干预措施的效果,并在实践中指导实施工作,从而增强医疗保健专业人员对证据的采用和可持续性。