Ma Daniel, Straathof Judith, Liu Yijing, Hull Natalie Marie
Department of Civil, Environmental and Geodetic Engineering, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210, United States.
The Sustainability Institute, The Ohio State University, Columbus, Ohio 43210, United States.
ACS ES T Water. 2022 May 31;2(11):2084-2093. doi: 10.1021/acsestwater.2c00055. eCollection 2022 Nov 11.
We evaluated the performance of reverse transcription quantitative PCR (uniplex and duplex RT-qPCR) and chip-based digital PCR (duplex RT-dPCR) using CDC N1 and CDC N2 assays for longitudinal monitoring of SARS-CoV-2 RNA in influent wastewater samples ( = 281) from three wastewater plants in Ohio from January 2021 to January 2022. Human fecal virus (PMMoV) and wastewater flow rate were used to normalize SARS-CoV-2 concentrations. SARS-CoV-2 measurements and COVID-19 cases were strongly correlated, but normalization effects on correlations varied between sewersheds. SARS-CoV-2 measurements by RT-qPCR were strongly correlated with 7-day moving average COVID-19 cases (average Spearman's ρ = 0.58, < 0.05). SARS-CoV-2 was detected more frequently in samples with duplex RT-dPCR than with duplex RT-qPCR during periods of low COVID-19 cases. Duplex and uniplex RT-qPCR N1 concentrations were more strongly correlated with cases (ρ = 0.62) than N2 (ρ = 0.52). RT-dPCR correlations (average ρ = 0.21) were weaker than those of RT-qPCR (average ρ = 0.58). We also share practical experience from establishing wastewater surveillance. Per sample, RT-qPCR had a lower cost ($6 vs $18) and sample turnaround time (3-4 h vs 7-9 h) than RT-dPCR. These findings reinforce selection and use of PCR-based wastewater surveillance tools.
我们使用美国疾病控制与预防中心(CDC)的N1和N2检测方法,评估了逆转录定量PCR(单重和双重RT-qPCR)以及基于芯片的数字PCR(双重RT-dPCR)在2021年1月至2022年1月期间对俄亥俄州三个污水处理厂进水废水样本(n = 281)中新冠病毒(SARS-CoV-2)RNA进行纵向监测的性能。使用人类粪便病毒(PMMoV)和废水流速对SARS-CoV-2浓度进行标准化。SARS-CoV-2测量值与新冠病例数密切相关,但不同流域的标准化对相关性的影响有所不同。RT-qPCR检测的SARS-CoV-2测量值与新冠病例的7天移动平均值密切相关(平均斯皮尔曼相关系数ρ = 0.58,P < 0.05)。在新冠病例数较低的时期,双重RT-dPCR检测到SARS-CoV-2的样本比双重RT-qPCR更频繁。双重和单重RT-qPCR的N1浓度与病例数的相关性(ρ = 0.62)比N2(ρ = 0.52)更强。RT-dPCR的相关性(平均ρ = 0.21)比RT-qPCR(平均ρ = 0.58)弱。我们还分享了建立废水监测的实践经验。每个样本的RT-qPCR成本(6美元对18美元)和样本周转时间(3 - 4小时对7 - 9小时)均低于RT-dPCR。这些发现强化了基于PCR的废水监测工具的选择和使用。