Suppr超能文献

比较氯胺酮和利多卡因对鼻整形术中躁动和疼痛的影响:一项随机临床试验。

Comparing the Effect of Ketamine and Lidocaine on Agitation and Pain in Rhinoplasty: A Randomized Clinical Trial.

作者信息

Omidvar Safoora, Ebrahimi Fatemeh, Amini Nazanin, Modir Hesameddin, Kia Mansoreh Karimi, Rahmaty Benyamin, Zarei Aref

机构信息

Department of Paramedicine, Arak University of Medical Sciences, Arak, Iran.

Department of Anesthesiology, Faculty of Medicine, Arak University of Medical Sciences, Arak, Iran.

出版信息

J Cutan Aesthet Surg. 2023 Apr-Jun;16(2):107-113. doi: 10.4103/JCAS.JCAS_205_22.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Emergence agitation (EA) is an important clinical problem that occurs during the initial period of recovery from anesthesia. This study aimed to determine the effects of ketamine and lidocaine administered on agitation level, postoperative pain, and hemodynamic changes in adults after rhinoplasty.

MATERIALS AND METHODS

Totally 72 patients scheduled to undergo elective rhinoplasty were enrolled in this prospective study. Patients were randomly divided into three groups including control group ( = 24), ketamine group ( = 24), and lidocaine group ( = 24). Twenty minutes before surgery completion, 1 ml saline was administered intravenously to the saline group, while 0.5 mg/kg ketamine or 1.5 mg/kg lidocaine was administered to two other groups. The emergence agitation level of the patients was evaluated using the Richmond Agitation-Sedation Scale just after extubation and in the post-anesthesia care unit (PACU). Postoperative pain was evaluated by Numerical Rating Scale that scored (from 0 to 10) every 10 min until the patients were discharged from PACU.

RESULTS

There was a significant difference between EA level between ketamine ( = 0.049) and lidocaine ( = 0.019) groups compared to the control group, and there was a significant difference between pain level between the ketamine ( = 0.008) and lidocaine ( = 0.035) groups compared the to control group, while there was no significant difference between the level of agitation ( = 0.922) and level of pain ( = 0.845) after extubation between the ketamine and lidocaine groups.

CONCLUSION

Ketamine and lidocaine are highly effective in preventing EA and pain control. Further studies with a greater sample size and longer follow-up period are needed to confirm the current findings.

摘要

背景

苏醒期躁动(EA)是麻醉苏醒初期出现的一个重要临床问题。本研究旨在确定氯胺酮和利多卡因对成人鼻整形术后躁动水平、术后疼痛及血流动力学变化的影响。

材料与方法

本前瞻性研究共纳入72例计划行择期鼻整形术的患者。患者被随机分为三组,包括对照组(n = 24)、氯胺酮组(n = 24)和利多卡因组(n = 24)。手术结束前20分钟,对照组静脉注射1毫升生理盐水,另外两组分别注射0.5毫克/千克氯胺酮或1.5毫克/千克利多卡因。在拔管后及麻醉后恢复室(PACU)使用里士满躁动镇静量表评估患者的苏醒期躁动水平。术后疼痛采用数字评分量表评估,每10分钟评分一次(0至10分),直至患者从PACU出院。

结果

与对照组相比,氯胺酮组(P = 0.049)和利多卡因组(P = 0.019)的EA水平存在显著差异,氯胺酮组(P = 0.008)和利多卡因组(P = 0.035)与对照组相比疼痛水平存在显著差异,而氯胺酮组和利多卡因组拔管后的躁动水平(P = 0.922)和疼痛水平(P = 0.845)无显著差异。

结论

氯胺酮和利多卡因在预防EA和控制疼痛方面非常有效。需要更大样本量和更长随访期的进一步研究来证实当前的研究结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/abfd/10405540/0227ef950389/JCAS-16-107-g001.jpg

文献AI研究员

20分钟写一篇综述,助力文献阅读效率提升50倍。

立即体验

用中文搜PubMed

大模型驱动的PubMed中文搜索引擎

马上搜索

文档翻译

学术文献翻译模型,支持多种主流文档格式。

立即体验