• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

组合未明意义加工的神经基础和个体认知风格的影响。

Neural underpinnings of processing combinatorial unstated meaning and the influence of individual cognitive style.

机构信息

Graduate Institute of Linguistics, National Chengchi University, Taipei, Taiwan.

Faculty of Science and Engineering, Waseda University, Tokyo, Japan.

出版信息

Cereb Cortex. 2023 Sep 9;33(18):10013-10027. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhad261.

DOI:10.1093/cercor/bhad261
PMID:37557907
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10502793/
Abstract

We investigated the neurocognitive mechanisms underlying the processing of combinatorial unstated meaning. Sentences like "Charles jumped for 5 minutes." engender an iterative meaning that is not explicitly stated but enriched by comprehenders beyond simple composition. Comprehending unstated meaning involves meaning contextualization-integrative meaning search in sentential-discourse context. Meanwhile, people differ in how they process information with varying context sensitivity. We hypothesized that unstated meaning processing would vary with individual socio-cognitive propensity indexed by the Autism-Spectrum Quotient (AQ), accompanied by differential cortical engagements. Using functional magnetic resonance imaging, we examined the processing of sentences with unstated iterative meaning in typically-developed individuals and found an engagement of the fronto-parietal network, including the left pars triangularis (L.PT), right intraparietal (R.IPS), and parieto-occipital sulcus (R.POS). We suggest that the L.PT subserves a contextual meaning search, while the R.IPS/POS supports enriching unstated iteration in consideration of event durations and interval lengths. Moreover, the activation level of these regions negatively correlated with AQ. Higher AQ ties to lower L.PT activation, likely reflecting weaker context sensitivity, along with lower IPS activation, likely reflecting weaker computation of events' numerical-temporal specifications. These suggest that the L.PT and R.IPS/POS support the processing of combinatorial unstated meaning, with the activation level modulated by individual cognitive styles.

摘要

我们研究了组合未明意义处理的神经认知机制。像“查尔斯跳了 5 分钟。”这样的句子产生了一种迭代的意义,这种意义不是明确陈述的,而是由理解者在简单的组合之外丰富的。理解未明意义涉及意义语境化——在句子——话语语境中进行综合意义搜索。同时,人们在处理具有不同语境敏感性的信息时存在差异。我们假设,未明意义的处理会因自闭症谱系商数(AQ)所索引的个体社会认知倾向而有所不同,同时伴随着皮质差异参与。使用功能磁共振成像,我们检查了在典型发展个体中具有未明迭代意义的句子的处理,发现了额顶网络的参与,包括左三角(L.PT)、右顶内(R.IPS)和顶枕沟(R.POS)。我们认为 L.PT 用于语境意义搜索,而 R.IPS/POS 则支持在考虑事件持续时间和间隔长度时丰富未明的迭代。此外,这些区域的激活水平与 AQ 呈负相关。较高的 AQ 与较低的 L.PT 激活相关,可能反映了较弱的语境敏感性,以及较低的 IPS 激活,可能反映了对事件的数值——时间特征的较弱计算。这些表明 L.PT 和 R.IPS/POS 支持组合未明意义的处理,其激活水平受个体认知风格的调节。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6c0/10502793/2c569ff3daf0/bhad261f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6c0/10502793/fe0a1bb80389/bhad261f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6c0/10502793/1a1ab03b7e0c/bhad261f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6c0/10502793/1bc650416318/bhad261f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6c0/10502793/514e2d5912f8/bhad261f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6c0/10502793/8d8381f27aa3/bhad261f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6c0/10502793/2c569ff3daf0/bhad261f6.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6c0/10502793/fe0a1bb80389/bhad261f1.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6c0/10502793/1a1ab03b7e0c/bhad261f2.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6c0/10502793/1bc650416318/bhad261f3.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6c0/10502793/514e2d5912f8/bhad261f4.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6c0/10502793/8d8381f27aa3/bhad261f5.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/b6c0/10502793/2c569ff3daf0/bhad261f6.jpg

相似文献

1
Neural underpinnings of processing combinatorial unstated meaning and the influence of individual cognitive style.组合未明意义加工的神经基础和个体认知风格的影响。
Cereb Cortex. 2023 Sep 9;33(18):10013-10027. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhad261.
2
The role of the right hemisphere in metaphor comprehension: a meta-analysis of functional magnetic resonance imaging studies.右半球在隐喻理解中的作用:功能磁共振成像研究的元分析。
Hum Brain Mapp. 2014 Jan;35(1):107-22. doi: 10.1002/hbm.22160. Epub 2012 Aug 30.
3
The neural circuits for arithmetic principles.算术原理的神经回路。
Neuroimage. 2017 Feb 15;147:432-446. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2016.12.035. Epub 2016 Dec 14.
4
Neural underpinnings of numerical and spatial cognition: An fMRI meta-analysis of brain regions associated with symbolic number, arithmetic, and mental rotation.数值和空间认知的神经基础:与符号数字、算术和心理旋转相关的脑区的 fMRI 元分析。
Neurosci Biobehav Rev. 2019 Aug;103:316-336. doi: 10.1016/j.neubiorev.2019.05.007. Epub 2019 May 10.
5
The Semantic System Supports the Processing of Mathematical Principles.语义系统支持数学原理的处理。
Neuroscience. 2019 Apr 15;404:102-118. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroscience.2019.01.043. Epub 2019 Jan 31.
6
Language in context: emergent features of word, sentence, and narrative comprehension.语境中的语言:单词、句子和叙事理解的新兴特征。
Neuroimage. 2005 Apr 15;25(3):1002-15. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2004.12.013.
7
Multiple Regions of a Cortical Network Commonly Encode the Meaning of Words in Multiple Grammatical Positions of Read Sentences.皮质网络的多个区域通常对阅读句子中多个语法位置的单词的含义进行编码。
Cereb Cortex. 2019 Jun 1;29(6):2396-2411. doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhy110.
8
Neural correlates of semantic ambiguity processing during context verification.语境验证过程中语义歧义处理的神经关联
Neuroimage. 2009 Apr 15;45(3):1009-19. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2008.12.044. Epub 2009 Jan 6.
9
Neuroimaging of the functional and structural networks underlying visuospatial vs. linguistic reasoning in high-functioning autism.高功能自闭症中视空间与语言推理的功能和结构网络的神经影像学研究。
Neuropsychologia. 2010 Jan;48(1):86-95. doi: 10.1016/j.neuropsychologia.2009.08.013.
10
Imagery in sentence comprehension: an fMRI study.句子理解中的意象:一项功能磁共振成像研究。
Neuroimage. 2004 Jan;21(1):112-24. doi: 10.1016/j.neuroimage.2003.08.042.

引用本文的文献

1
Resting heart rate causally affects the brain cortical structure: Mendelian randomization study.静息心率对大脑皮质结构有因果影响:孟德尔随机化研究。
Cereb Cortex. 2024 Jan 31;34(2). doi: 10.1093/cercor/bhad536.

本文引用的文献

1
Individual Differences in Indirect Speech Act Processing Found Outside the Language Network.在语言网络之外发现的间接言语行为处理中的个体差异。
Neurobiol Lang (Camb). 2022 Apr 13;3(2):287-317. doi: 10.1162/nol_a_00066. eCollection 2022.
2
Enhanced rationality in autism spectrum disorder.自闭症谱系障碍中的增强理性。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2021 Aug;25(8):685-696. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2021.05.004. Epub 2021 Jul 2.
3
A Posterior-Anterior Distinction between Scene Perception and Scene Construction in Human Medial Parietal Cortex.
人类顶内沟后部在场景感知和场景构建之间存在前后区分。
J Neurosci. 2019 Jan 23;39(4):705-717. doi: 10.1523/JNEUROSCI.1219-18.2018. Epub 2018 Nov 30.
4
Testing the Empathizing-Systemizing theory of sex differences and the Extreme Male Brain theory of autism in half a million people.在 50 万人中测试性别差异的共情-系统化理论和自闭症的极端男性大脑理论。
Proc Natl Acad Sci U S A. 2018 Nov 27;115(48):12152-12157. doi: 10.1073/pnas.1811032115. Epub 2018 Nov 12.
5
Syllogistic reasoning reveals reduced bias in people with higher autistic-like traits from the general population.三段论推理揭示了一般人群中具有较高自闭症特质的人偏见减少。
Autism. 2019 Jul;23(5):1311-1321. doi: 10.1177/1362361318808779. Epub 2018 Nov 9.
6
Context-Sensitivity and Individual Differences in the Derivation of Scalar Implicature.量级含义推导中的语境敏感性与个体差异
Front Psychol. 2018 Sep 20;9:1720. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01720. eCollection 2018.
7
Assessing Theory of Mind by Humor: The Humor Comprehension and Appreciation Test (ToM-HCAT).通过幽默评估心理理论:幽默理解与欣赏测试(ToM-HCAT)。
Front Psychol. 2018 Aug 13;9:1470. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.01470. eCollection 2018.
8
Factors Influencing Right Hemisphere Engagement During Metaphor Comprehension.隐喻理解过程中影响右半球参与的因素。
Front Psychol. 2018 Mar 28;9:414. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2018.00414. eCollection 2018.
9
Cortical circuits for mathematical knowledge: evidence for a major subdivision within the brain's semantic networks.大脑数学知识的皮质回路:大脑语义网络内的主要分支的证据。
Philos Trans R Soc Lond B Biol Sci. 2017 Feb 19;373(1740). doi: 10.1098/rstb.2016.0515.
10
Individual Differences in Language Acquisition and Processing.个体语言习得和处理的差异。
Trends Cogn Sci. 2018 Feb;22(2):154-169. doi: 10.1016/j.tics.2017.11.006. Epub 2017 Dec 23.