Woodward-Lopez Gail, Esaryk Erin E, Hewawitharana Sridharshi C, Kao Janice, Talmage Evan, Rider Carolyn D
University of California, Nutrition Policy Institute, Division of Agriculture and Natural Resources, 1111 Franklin Street, 11th Floor, Oakland, CA, 94607, USA.
SSM Popul Health. 2023 Jul 23;23:101471. doi: 10.1016/j.ssmph.2023.101471. eCollection 2023 Sep.
Describe, and assess disparities in, the changes in Supplemental Nutrition Assistance Program Education (SNAP-Ed) that occurred the year before vs. the year when COVID-19 restrictions were implemented.
Observational study comparing reach, intensity, and dose of California Local Health Department (LHD) SNAP-Ed interventions in Federal Fiscal years 2019 and 2020 (FFY19, FFY20).
Student t-tests determined significance of differences in the number of Direct Education (DE) programs, Policy, Systems and Environmental change (PSE) sites, people reached, and intervention intensity and dose between FFY19 and FFY20 using data reported online by LHDs. Linear regression assessed associations between census tract-level characteristics (urbanicity; percentages of population with income <185% of federal poverty level, under 18 years of age, and belonging to various racial/ethnic groups; and California Healthy Places Index) and changes in number of DE programs, PSE sites, people reached, and intervention dose between FFY19 and FFY20.
From FFY19 to FFY20, the number of DE programs, PSE sites, people reached, and census tract-level intervention intensity and dose decreased. Higher census tract poverty, higher proportions of Black and Latino residents, and less healthy neighborhood conditions were associated with greater decreases in some intervention characteristics including PSE sites, PSE reach, DE programs, and DE dose.
These reductions in LHD SNAP-Ed interventions indicate reduced access to education and environments that support healthy eating and obesity prevention during a time when this support was especially needed to reduce risk of COVID-19 infection and complications. Disproportionately reduced access, may have worsened health disparities in already-disadvantaged communities. Assuring maintenance of SNAP-Ed interventions, especially in disadvantaged communities, should be a priority during public health emergencies.
描述并评估补充营养援助计划教育(SNAP-Ed)在实施新冠疫情限制措施前一年与实施当年的变化差异。
观察性研究,比较2019财年和2020财年(联邦财政年度19、联邦财政年度20)加利福尼亚地方卫生部门(LHD)的SNAP-Ed干预措施的覆盖范围、强度和剂量。
使用地方卫生部门在线报告的数据,通过学生t检验确定2019财年和2020财年之间直接教育(DE)项目数量、政策、系统和环境变化(PSE)场所、覆盖人群以及干预强度和剂量差异的显著性。线性回归评估普查区层面特征(城市化程度;收入低于联邦贫困线185%的人口百分比、18岁以下人口百分比以及属于不同种族/族裔群体的人口百分比;以及加利福尼亚健康场所指数)与2019财年和2020财年之间DE项目数量、PSE场所、覆盖人群和干预剂量变化之间的关联。
从2019财年到2020财年,DE项目数量、PSE场所、覆盖人群以及普查区层面的干预强度和剂量均有所下降。普查区贫困程度较高、黑人和拉丁裔居民比例较高以及社区健康状况较差与某些干预特征(包括PSE场所、PSE覆盖范围、DE项目和DE剂量)的更大降幅相关。
地方卫生部门SNAP-Ed干预措施的这些减少表明,在特别需要这种支持以降低新冠感染和并发症风险的时候,获得支持健康饮食和预防肥胖的教育及环境的机会减少了。获得机会的不成比例减少可能加剧了弱势社区的健康差距。在突发公共卫生事件期间,确保维持SNAP-Ed干预措施,尤其是在弱势社区,应成为优先事项。