• 文献检索
  • 文档翻译
  • 深度研究
  • 学术资讯
  • Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件
  • 邀请有礼
  • 套餐&价格
  • 历史记录
应用&插件
Suppr Zotero 插件Zotero 插件浏览器插件Mac 客户端Windows 客户端微信小程序
定价
高级版会员购买积分包购买API积分包
服务
文献检索文档翻译深度研究API 文档MCP 服务
关于我们
关于 Suppr公司介绍联系我们用户协议隐私条款
关注我们

Suppr 超能文献

核心技术专利:CN118964589B侵权必究
粤ICP备2023148730 号-1Suppr @ 2026

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验

以人为主的医疗保健环境:亲生物设计的新框架。

Human-centred health-care environments: a new framework for biophilic design.

作者信息

Tekin Bekir Huseyin, Urbano Gutiérrez Rosa

机构信息

School of Architecture, University of Liverpool, Liverpool, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Front Med Technol. 2023 Jul 25;5:1219897. doi: 10.3389/fmedt.2023.1219897. eCollection 2023.

DOI:10.3389/fmedt.2023.1219897
PMID:37560462
原文链接:https://pmc.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/articles/PMC10408300/
Abstract

Increasing research corroborates that the qualities of the setting in which a patient receives healthcare positively influence health outcomes. Therefore, it has become progressively important to review the concept of therapeutic environments, as places where patients are treated with the most advanced medicine and technology, but also support their users in psychological, emotional and social terms. This quest for the optimal healing environment brings to the forefront the need to include other parameters in our design briefs, where the application of biophilic design proves to be paramount, as exposure to nature is associated with multiple health benefits. However, current biophilic design frameworks fail to provide efficient guidance, as their design recommendations don't differentiate the level of value of each design parameter for each building programme and context. Our position is that a biophilic design framework can only be efficient if it is adapted to specific building functions and is geographically and culturally contextualized. This study assessed the application of biophilic design in therapeutic environments for cancer patients in the UK, and provided a revised conceptual framework that can more efficiently guide designers and policies in future interventions. This framework was informed by synthesised analyses from healthcare environments on the user's experiences, and primary data obtained from semi-structured interviews with architects and managers, which was then benchmarked against scientific data about the impact of biophilic design on humans. This comprehensive approach helped to identify and rank those biophilic design parameters that appear the most critical for promoting and supporting health and wellbeing in cancer healthcare settings and provided an up-to-date compilation of crucial design actions to enact the necessary change in future research and design practice.

摘要

越来越多的研究证实,患者接受医疗保健的环境质量对健康结果有积极影响。因此,审视治疗环境的概念变得越来越重要,治疗环境不仅是患者接受最先进医学和技术治疗的地方,还在心理、情感和社会方面为使用者提供支持。对最佳康复环境的追求凸显了在我们的设计纲要中纳入其他参数的必要性,其中亲生物设计的应用被证明至关重要,因为接触自然与多种健康益处相关。然而,当前的亲生物设计框架未能提供有效的指导,因为它们的设计建议没有区分每个设计参数对于每个建筑项目和背景的价值水平。我们的观点是,亲生物设计框架只有在适应特定建筑功能并在地理和文化背景下进行调整时才会有效。本研究评估了亲生物设计在英国癌症患者治疗环境中的应用,并提供了一个经过修订的概念框架,该框架可以更有效地指导设计师和政策制定者未来的干预措施。这个框架是通过对医疗保健环境中用户体验的综合分析以及从与建筑师和管理人员的半结构化访谈中获得的原始数据得出的,然后将这些数据与关于亲生物设计对人类影响的科学数据进行对比。这种全面的方法有助于识别和排列那些在癌症医疗环境中对促进和支持健康与福祉最为关键的亲生物设计参数,并提供了一份最新的关键设计行动汇编,以便在未来的研究和设计实践中实施必要的变革。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c415/10408300/f68a4573f749/fmedt-05-1219897-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c415/10408300/94db40fd90f1/fmedt-05-1219897-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c415/10408300/fc34e1ae6c3c/fmedt-05-1219897-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c415/10408300/bcc20ef46039/fmedt-05-1219897-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c415/10408300/f9ebc8bfbaf8/fmedt-05-1219897-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c415/10408300/abf1cdb56d73/fmedt-05-1219897-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c415/10408300/efc9e316bb89/fmedt-05-1219897-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c415/10408300/d5bd25417f41/fmedt-05-1219897-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c415/10408300/f68a4573f749/fmedt-05-1219897-g008.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c415/10408300/94db40fd90f1/fmedt-05-1219897-g001.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c415/10408300/fc34e1ae6c3c/fmedt-05-1219897-g002.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c415/10408300/bcc20ef46039/fmedt-05-1219897-g003.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c415/10408300/f9ebc8bfbaf8/fmedt-05-1219897-g004.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c415/10408300/abf1cdb56d73/fmedt-05-1219897-g005.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c415/10408300/efc9e316bb89/fmedt-05-1219897-g006.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c415/10408300/d5bd25417f41/fmedt-05-1219897-g007.jpg
https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/c415/10408300/f68a4573f749/fmedt-05-1219897-g008.jpg

相似文献

1
Human-centred health-care environments: a new framework for biophilic design.以人为主的医疗保健环境:亲生物设计的新框架。
Front Med Technol. 2023 Jul 25;5:1219897. doi: 10.3389/fmedt.2023.1219897. eCollection 2023.
2
A Systematic Review and Conceptual Framework of Biophilic Design Parameters in Clinical Environments.临床环境中亲生命设计参数的系统评价和概念框架。
HERD. 2023 Jan;16(1):233-250. doi: 10.1177/19375867221118675. Epub 2022 Aug 22.
3
Biophilic Experience-Based Residential Hybrid Framework.基于亲生命体验的住宅混合框架。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2022 Jul 12;19(14):8512. doi: 10.3390/ijerph19148512.
4
Biophilic Design as an Important Bridge for Sustainable Interaction between Humans and the Environment: Based on Practice in Chinese Healthcare Space.亲生命设计作为人类与环境可持续互动的重要桥梁:以中国医疗空间的实践为基础。
Comput Math Methods Med. 2022 Jul 6;2022:8184534. doi: 10.1155/2022/8184534. eCollection 2022.
5
Biophilic Design and Its Effectiveness in Creating Emotional Well-Being, Green Satisfaction, and Workplace Attachment Among Healthcare Professionals: The Hospice Context.亲生物设计及其在医疗保健专业人员中营造情感幸福感、绿色满意度和工作场所归属感方面的有效性:临终关怀环境
HERD. 2024 Jan;17(1):190-208. doi: 10.1177/19375867231192087. Epub 2023 Aug 22.
6
Loving Nature From the Inside Out: A Biophilia Matrix Identification Strategy for Designers.从内而外热爱自然:设计师的亲生物矩阵识别策略。
HERD. 2015 Summer;8(4):115-30. doi: 10.1177/1937586715578644.
7
The future of Cochrane Neonatal.考克兰新生儿协作网的未来。
Early Hum Dev. 2020 Nov;150:105191. doi: 10.1016/j.earlhumdev.2020.105191. Epub 2020 Sep 12.
8
Beyond the black stump: rapid reviews of health research issues affecting regional, rural and remote Australia.超越黑木树:影响澳大利亚地区、农村和偏远地区的健康研究问题的快速综述。
Med J Aust. 2020 Dec;213 Suppl 11:S3-S32.e1. doi: 10.5694/mja2.50881.
9
Effects of biophilic indoor environment on stress and anxiety recovery: A between-subjects experiment in virtual reality.亲生命室内环境对压力和焦虑恢复的影响:虚拟现实中的被试间实验。
Environ Int. 2020 Mar;136:105427. doi: 10.1016/j.envint.2019.105427. Epub 2019 Dec 24.
10
Exploring the Links Between Biophilic and Restorative Qualities of Exterior and Interior Spaces in Leon, Guanajuato, Mexico.探索墨西哥瓜纳华托州莱昂市室内外空间的亲生物性与恢复性特质之间的联系。
Front Psychol. 2021 Aug 17;12:717116. doi: 10.3389/fpsyg.2021.717116. eCollection 2021.

引用本文的文献

1
Biophilic design, neuroarchitecture and therapeutic home environments: harnessing medicinal properties of intentionally-designed spaces to enhance digital health outcomes.亲生物设计、神经建筑学与治疗性家庭环境:利用精心设计空间的药用特性提升数字健康成果。
Front Med (Lausanne). 2025 Jul 10;12:1610259. doi: 10.3389/fmed.2025.1610259. eCollection 2025.
2
Home Environment as a Therapeutic Target for Prevention and Treatment of Chronic Diseases: Delivering Restorative Living Spaces, Patient Education and Self-Care by Bridging Biophilic Design, E-Commerce and Digital Health Technologies.家庭环境作为慢性病防治的治疗靶点:通过融合亲生物设计、电子商务和数字健康技术,提供恢复性居住空间、患者教育和自我护理。
Int J Environ Res Public Health. 2025 Feb 5;22(2):225. doi: 10.3390/ijerph22020225.

本文引用的文献

1
A Systematic Review and Conceptual Framework of Biophilic Design Parameters in Clinical Environments.临床环境中亲生命设计参数的系统评价和概念框架。
HERD. 2023 Jan;16(1):233-250. doi: 10.1177/19375867221118675. Epub 2022 Aug 22.
2
Influence of Nature at the Time of the Pandemic: An Experience-Based Survey at the Time of SARS-CoV-2 to Demonstrate How Even a Short Break in Nature Can Reduce Stress for Healthcare Staff.大流行时期的自然影响:SARS-CoV-2 时期的一项基于经验的调查,展示了即使是短暂的自然休息也如何能减轻医护人员的压力。
HERD. 2021 Apr;14(2):49-65. doi: 10.1177/1937586721991113. Epub 2021 Feb 18.
3
The effects of changes to the built environment on the mental health and well-being of adults: Systematic review.
改变建筑环境对成年人心理健康和幸福感的影响:系统评价。
Health Place. 2018 Sep;53:237-257. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2018.07.012. Epub 2018 Sep 6.
4
Psychosocial Impact of Cancer.癌症的社会心理影响
Recent Results Cancer Res. 2018;210:1-11. doi: 10.1007/978-3-319-64310-6_1.
5
Effects of environmental design on patient outcome: a systematic review.环境设计对患者结局的影响:系统评价。
HERD. 2014 Summer;7(4):108-19. doi: 10.1177/193758671400700410.
6
Four-week prevalence of mental disorders in patients with cancer across major tumor entities.癌症患者中主要肿瘤实体的精神障碍四周患病率。
J Clin Oncol. 2014 Nov 1;32(31):3540-6. doi: 10.1200/JCO.2014.56.0086. Epub 2014 Oct 6.
7
Patient experiences of depression and anxiety with chronic disease: a systematic review and qualitative meta-synthesis.慢性病患者的抑郁和焦虑体验:一项系统评价与质性元整合分析
Ont Health Technol Assess Ser. 2013 Sep 1;13(16):1-33. eCollection 2013.
8
Measuring circadian light and its impact on adolescents.测量昼夜节律光及其对青少年的影响。
Light Res Technol. 2011 Jun;43(2):201-215. doi: 10.1177/1477153510382853. Epub 2010 Oct 27.
9
When walking in nature is not restorative-the role of prospect and refuge.当在大自然中散步无法恢复精力时——展望和庇护所的作用。
Health Place. 2013 Mar;20:91-101. doi: 10.1016/j.healthplace.2013.01.001. Epub 2013 Jan 9.
10
Prevalence of depression, anxiety, and adjustment disorder in oncological, haematological, and palliative-care settings: a meta-analysis of 94 interview-based studies.在肿瘤、血液和姑息治疗环境中,基于访谈的 94 项研究的荟萃分析:抑郁、焦虑和适应障碍的患病率。
Lancet Oncol. 2011 Feb;12(2):160-74. doi: 10.1016/S1470-2045(11)70002-X. Epub 2011 Jan 19.