Wiggers T, Arends J W, Verstijnen C, Moerkerk P M, Bosman F T
Br J Cancer. 1986 Sep;54(3):409-14. doi: 10.1038/bjc.1986.191.
In order to determine the clinical value of CEA detection in large bowel cancer tissue the patterns rather than the intensity of immunoreactivity of CEA reactive antibodies were analyzed in 312 large bowel cancer patients especially in relation to patient survival. CEA immunoreactivity appeared to be distinguishable into a predominantly apical/cytoplasmic and a predominantly membranous pattern. Twenty-four (7.7%) tumours were found to be CEA negative or only focally positive. Two hundred and eighty-three (90.7%) of the carcinomas showed a predominantly apical/cytoplasmic immunoreactivity pattern, whereas 5 (1.6%) of the tumours revealed mostly membranous CEA immunoreactivity. CEA negative or focally positive carcinomas and CEA positive tumours with membranous immunoreactivity were significantly more often observed in the group of poorly differentiated carcinomas (P greater than 0.001), but showed no significant correlation with stage of tumour extension (P = 0.11). Also, these carcinomas demonstrated a more aggressive course in patients compared to CEA positive tumours with an apical/cytoplasmic CEA expression pattern. We, therefore, conclude that determination of the pattern of CEA immunoreactivity in large bowel cancer tissue may enable the detection of subgroups of patients with a poor prognosis.
为了确定癌胚抗原(CEA)检测在大肠癌组织中的临床价值,我们分析了312例大肠癌患者CEA反应性抗体的免疫反应模式而非强度,尤其关注其与患者生存率的关系。CEA免疫反应性似乎可分为主要为顶端/细胞质型和主要为膜型。发现24例(7.7%)肿瘤CEA阴性或仅局灶性阳性。283例(90.7%)癌显示主要为顶端/细胞质免疫反应模式,而5例(1.6%)肿瘤主要表现为膜性CEA免疫反应。CEA阴性或局灶性阳性癌以及具有膜性免疫反应的CEA阳性肿瘤在低分化癌组中更常出现(P>0.001),但与肿瘤浸润分期无显著相关性(P = 0.11)。此外,与具有顶端/细胞质CEA表达模式的CEA阳性肿瘤相比,这些癌在患者中表现出更具侵袭性的病程。因此,我们得出结论,测定大肠癌组织中CEA免疫反应模式可能有助于检测预后不良的患者亚组。