Gruber Maria, Alexopoulos Johanna, Doering Stephan, Feichtinger Karin, Friedrich Fabian, Klauser Miriam, Hinterbuchinger Barbara, Litvan Zsuzsa, Mossaheb Nilufar, Parth Karoline, Wininger Antonia, Blüml Victor
Department of Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria; and Department of Psychiatry and Psychotherapy, Clinical Division of Social Psychiatry, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
Department of Psychoanalysis and Psychotherapy, Medical University of Vienna, Vienna, Austria.
BJPsych Open. 2023 Aug 11;9(5):e150. doi: 10.1192/bjo.2023.530.
Assessment of personality functioning in different stages of psychotic disorders could provide valuable information on psychopathology, course of illness and treatment planning, but empirical data are sparse.
To investigate personality functioning and sense of self in individuals at ultra-high risk (UHR) for psychosis and with first-episode psychosis (FEP) in comparison with a clinical control group of individuals with borderline personality disorder (BPD) and healthy controls.
In a cross-sectional design, we investigated personality functioning (Structured Interview of Personality Organization, STIPO; Level of Personality Functioning Scale, LPFS) and disturbances of the basic self (Examination of Anomalous Self-Experience, EASE) in 107 participants, comprising 24 individuals at UHR, 29 individuals with FEP, 27 individuals with BPD and 27 healthy controls.
The UHR, FEP and BPD groups had moderate to severe deficits in personality organisation (STIPO) compared with the healthy control group. Self-functioning with its subdomain (facet) 'self-direction' (LPFS) was significantly worse in participants with manifest psychosis (FEP) compared with those at-risk for psychosis (UHR). The FEP group showed significantly worse overall personality functioning than the UHR group and significantly higher levels of self-disturbance (EASE) than the BPD group, with the UHR group lying between these diagnostic groups. Hierarchical cluster analysis based on the seven STIPO domains yielded three clusters differing in level of personality functioning and self-disturbances.
Our data demonstrate that psychotic disorders are associated with impaired personality functioning and self-disturbances. Assessment of personality functioning can inform treatment planning for patients at different stages of psychotic disorder.
评估精神障碍不同阶段的人格功能可为精神病理学、疾病进程及治疗规划提供有价值的信息,但实证数据稀少。
与边缘型人格障碍(BPD)临床对照组及健康对照组相比,调查精神病超高风险(UHR)个体及首发精神病(FEP)个体的人格功能及自我感。
采用横断面设计,我们调查了107名参与者的人格功能(人格组织结构化访谈,STIPO;人格功能水平量表,LPFS)及基本自我障碍(异常自我体验检查,EASE),这些参与者包括24名UHR个体、29名FEP个体、27名BPD个体及27名健康对照。
与健康对照组相比,UHR组、FEP组和BPD组在人格组织(STIPO)方面存在中度至重度缺陷。与精神病风险个体(UHR)相比,有明显精神病症状(FEP)的参与者在自我功能及其子领域(方面)“自我导向”(LPFS)方面明显更差。FEP组的总体人格功能明显比UHR组差,自我障碍水平(EASE)明显高于BPD组,UHR组介于这两个诊断组之间。基于七个STIPO领域的层次聚类分析产生了三个在人格功能水平和自我障碍方面不同的聚类。
我们的数据表明,精神障碍与人格功能受损和自我障碍有关。人格功能评估可为精神障碍不同阶段患者的治疗规划提供信息。