Suppr超能文献

身体干预方面的人员培训:文献综述

Staff training in physical interventions: a literature review.

作者信息

McDonnell Andrew A, O'Shea Marion C, Bews-Pugh Stephanie J, McAulliffe Hannah, Deveau Roy

机构信息

Birmingham City University, Birmingham, United Kingdom.

Studio 3 Clinical Services Limited, Alcester, United Kingdom.

出版信息

Front Psychiatry. 2023 Jul 26;14:1129039. doi: 10.3389/fpsyt.2023.1129039. eCollection 2023.

Abstract

BACKGROUND

Restrictive practices are used frequently by frontline staff in a variety of care contexts, including psychiatric hospitals, children's services, and support services for older adults and individuals with intellectual and developmental disabilities. Physical restraint has been associated with emotional harm, physical injury to staff and consumers, and has even resulted in death of individuals in care environments. Various interventions have been implemented within care settings with the intention of reducing instances of restraint. One of the most common interventions is staff training that includes some physical intervention skills to support staff to manage crisis situations. Despite physical intervention training being used widely in care services, there is little evidence to support the effectiveness and application of physical interventions. This review will examine the literature regarding outcomes of staff training in physical interventions across care sectors.

METHOD

A systematic search was conducted following PRISMA guidelines using Cochrane Database, Medline EBSCO, Medline OVID, PsychINFO, and the Web of Science. Main search keywords were staff training, physical intervention, physical restraint. The MMAT was utilised to provide an analytical framework for the included studies.

RESULTS AND DISCUSSION

Seventeen articles have been included in this literature review. The included studies take place in a range of care settings and comprise a wide range of outcomes and designs. The training programmes examined vary widely in their duration, course content, teaching methods, and extent to which physical skills are taught. Studies were of relatively poor quality. Many descriptions of training programmes did not clearly operationalise the knowledge and skills taught to staff. As such, it is difficult to compare course content across the studies. Few papers described physical interventions in sufficient detail. This review demonstrates that, although staff training is a 'first response' to managing health and safety in care settings, there is very little evidence to suggest that staff training in physical intervention skills leads to meaningful outcomes.

摘要

背景

在各种护理环境中,包括精神病医院、儿童服务机构以及针对老年人和智力与发育障碍者的支持服务机构,一线工作人员经常使用限制性措施。身体约束与情感伤害、工作人员和服务对象的身体损伤有关,甚至在护理环境中导致了人员死亡。为减少约束事件,护理机构实施了各种干预措施。最常见的干预措施之一是对工作人员进行培训,其中包括一些身体干预技能,以帮助工作人员应对危机情况。尽管身体干预培训在护理服务中被广泛使用,但几乎没有证据支持身体干预的有效性和应用。本综述将研究有关各护理部门身体干预工作人员培训结果的文献。

方法

按照PRISMA指南,在Cochrane数据库、EBSCO的Medline、OVID的Medline、PsychINFO和科学网进行了系统检索。主要检索关键词为工作人员培训、身体干预、身体约束。使用MMAT为纳入研究提供分析框架。

结果与讨论

本综述纳入了17篇文章。纳入研究发生在一系列护理环境中,包括广泛的结果和设计。所研究的培训项目在持续时间、课程内容、教学方法以及身体技能的教授程度上差异很大。研究质量相对较差。许多培训项目的描述没有明确界定向工作人员传授的知识和技能。因此,很难比较各项研究的课程内容。很少有论文对身体干预进行了足够详细的描述。本综述表明,尽管工作人员培训是护理环境中管理健康与安全的“第一反应”,但几乎没有证据表明身体干预技能的工作人员培训能带来有意义的结果。

https://cdn.ncbi.nlm.nih.gov/pmc/blobs/1917/10411725/0f5fcad47144/fpsyt-14-1129039-g001.jpg

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验