Suppr超能文献

比较术后癌胚抗原监测中的预测性决策规则。

Comparing predictive decision rules in postoperative CEA monitoring.

作者信息

Denstman F, Rosen L, Khubchandani I T, Sheets J A, Stasik J J, Riether R D

出版信息

Cancer. 1986 Nov 1;58(9):2089-95. doi: 10.1002/1097-0142(19861101)58:9<2089::aid-cncr2820580921>3.0.co;2-w.

Abstract

To evaluate the usefulness of serial postoperative carcinoembryonic antigen (CEA) assays, seven previously published decision rules for predicting tumor recurrence were compared retrospectively using CEA values from 214 patients followed 36 to 120 months after surgery for colorectal carcinoma. Decision rules employing cutoff values to predict tumor recurrence were found inadequate for the asymptomatic patient. This attenuation of prognostic usefulness appeared attributable to inadequacies of CEA assays for predicting late recurrences. From these analyses, elevated CEA results without other objective evidence might be insufficient to justify second-look surgery. In addition, late recurring tumors tended not to cause elevated CEA levels.

摘要

为评估术后连续癌胚抗原(CEA)检测的效用,我们回顾性比较了7条先前发表的用于预测肿瘤复发的决策规则,这些规则采用了214例接受结直肠癌手术后随访36至120个月患者的CEA值。发现采用临界值预测肿瘤复发的决策规则对无症状患者并不适用。这种预后效用的减弱似乎归因于CEA检测在预测晚期复发方面的不足。通过这些分析,没有其他客观证据的CEA结果升高可能不足以证明进行二次探查手术是合理的。此外,晚期复发肿瘤往往不会导致CEA水平升高。

文献检索

告别复杂PubMed语法,用中文像聊天一样搜索,搜遍4000万医学文献。AI智能推荐,让科研检索更轻松。

立即免费搜索

文件翻译

保留排版,准确专业,支持PDF/Word/PPT等文件格式,支持 12+语言互译。

免费翻译文档

深度研究

AI帮你快速写综述,25分钟生成高质量综述,智能提取关键信息,辅助科研写作。

立即免费体验